Skip to main content

The Effect of Interaction Granularity on Learning with a Data Normalization Tutor

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7926))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) have proven their effectiveness in many instructional domains, ranging in the complexity of domain theories and tasks students are to perform. The typical effect sizes achieved by ITSs are around 1SD, which are still low in comparison to the effectiveness of expert human tutors. Recently there have been several analyses done in order to identify the factors that contribute to success of human tutors, and to replicate it in ITSs. VanLehn [6] proposes that the crucial factor is the granularity of interaction: the lower the level of discussions between the (human or artificial) tutor and the student, the higher the effectiveness. We investigated the effect of interaction granularity in the context of NORMIT, a constraint-based tutor that teaches data normalization. Our study compared the standard version of NORMIT, which provided hints in response to errors, to a version which used adaptive tutorial dialogues instead. The results show that the interaction granularity hypothesis holds in our experimental situation, and that the effect size achieved is consistent with other reported studies of a similar nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bloom, B.S.: The 2-sigma problem: the search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13, 4–16 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koedinger, K., Aleven, V.: Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review 19, 239–264 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chi, M.T.H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.H., LaVancher, C.: Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science 18, 439–477 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R.: An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science 26, 147–179 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitrovic, A.: The effect of explaining on learning: a case study with a data normalization tutor. In: Looi, C.-K., McCalla, G., Bredeweg, B., Breuker, J. (eds.) Proc. Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 499–506. IOS Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. VanLehn, K.: The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist 46(4), 197–221 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Suraweera, P., Mitrovic, A.: An Intelligent Tutoring System for Entity Relationship Modelling. Artificial Intelligence in Education 14(3-4), 375–417 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Amalathas, S., Mitrovic, A., Ravan, S.: Decision-making tutor: providing on-the-job training for oil palm plantation managers. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 7(3), 131–152 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mitrovic, A.: Fifteen years of Constraint-Based Tutors: What we have achieved and where we are going. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22(1-2), 39–72 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weerasinghe, A., Mitrovic, A., Thomson, D., Mogin, P., Martin, B.: Evaluating a General Model of Adaptive Tutorial Dialogues. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS, vol. 6738, pp. 394–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitrovic, A., Mathews, M., Holland, J.: Exploring two strategies for teaching procedures. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 499–504. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Elmasri, R., Navathe, S.B.: Fundamentals of database systems. Addison-Wesley (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Phillip, G.C.: Teaching database modeling and design: areas of confusion and helpful hints. Journal of Information Technology Education 6, 481–497 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weerasinghe, A., Mitrovic, A., Martin, B.: Towards individualized dialogue support for ill-defined domains. Artificial Intelligence in Education 19(4), 357–379 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ohlsson, S.: Learning from Performance Errors. Psychological Review 103(2), 241–262 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weerasinghe, A., Mitrovic, A., Shareghi Najar, A., Holland, J. (2013). The Effect of Interaction Granularity on Learning with a Data Normalization Tutor. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics