Skip to main content

On the Informativeness of Asymmetric Dissimilarities

  • Conference paper
Similarity-Based Pattern Recognition (SIMBAD 2013)

Abstract

A widely used approach to cope with asymmetry in dissimilarities is by symmetrizing them. Usually, asymmetry is corrected by applying combiners such as average, minimum or maximum of the two directed dissimilarities. Whether or not these are the best approaches for combining the asymmetry remains an open issue. In this paper we study the performance of the extended asymmetric dissimilarity space (EADS) as an alternative to represent asymmetric dissimilarities for classification purposes. We show that EADS outperforms the representations found from the two directed dissimilarities as well as those created by the combiners under consideration in several cases. This holds specially for small numbers of prototypes; however, for large numbers of prototypes the EADS may suffer more from overfitting than the other approaches. Prototype selection is recommended to overcome overfitting in these cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowdle, B., Gentner, D.: Informativity and asymmetry in comparisons. Cogn. Psychol. 34(3), 244–286 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Briggs, F., Lakshminarayanan, B., Neal, L., Fern, X., Raich, R., Hadley, S., Hadley, A., Betts, M.: Acoustic classification of multiple simultaneous bird species: A multi-instance multi-label approach. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 4640 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bunke, H., Bühler, U.: Applications of approximate string matching to 2D shape recognition. Pattern Recogn. 26(12), 1797–1812 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunke, H., Riesen, K.: Graph classification based on dissimilarity space embedding. In: da Vitoria Lobo, N., Kasparis, T., Roli, F., Kwok, J.T., Georgiopoulos, M., Anagnostopoulos, G.C., Loog, M. (eds.) S+SSPR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5342, pp. 996–1007. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheplygina, V., Tax, D.M.J., Loog, M.: Class-dependent dissimilarity measures for multiple instance learning. In: Gimel’farb, G., Hancock, E., Imiya, A., Kuijper, A., Kudo, M., Omachi, S., Windeatt, T., Yamada, K. (eds.) SSPR&SPR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7626, pp. 602–610. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietterich, T., Lathrop, R., Lozano-Pérez, T.: Solving the multiple instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles. Artif. Intell. 89(1-2), 31–71 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dinh, C., Duin, R.P.W., Loog, M.: A study on semi-supervised dissimilarity representation. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duin, R.P.W., Juszczak, P., Paclik, P., Pękalska, E., De Ridder, D., Tax, D.M.J., Verzakov, S.: A Matlab toolbox for pattern recognition. PRTools version 3 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duin, R.P.W., Pekalska, E.: Non-Euclidean dissimilarities: causes and informativeness. In: Proceedings of the 2010 joint IAPR international conference on Structural, Syntactic, and Statistical Pattern Recognition. pp. 324–333. SSPR & SPR’10, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Duin, R.P.W., Pękalska, E.: The dissimilarity space: bridging structural and statistical pattern recognition. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 33(7), 826–832 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gärtner, T., Flach, P., Kowalczyk, A., Smola, A.: Multi-instance kernels. In: Proc. of the 19th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pp. 179–186 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jain, A.K., Zongker, D.: Representation and recognition of handwritten digits using deformable templates. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19, 1386–1391 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muñoz, A., de Diego, I.M., Moguerza, J.M.: Support vector machine classifiers for asymmetric proximities. In: Kaynak, O., Alpaydın, E., Oja, E., Xu, L. (eds.) ICANN/ICONIP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2714, pp. 217–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Pękalska, E., Duin, R.P.W.: The Dissimilarity Representation for Pattern Recognition: Foundations and Applications (Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence). World Scientific Publishing Co. Inc., River Edge (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pękalska, E., Duin, R.P.W.: Beyond traditional kernels: Classification in two dissimilarity-based representation spaces. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C, Appl. Rev. 38(6), 729–744 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pękalska, E., Duin, R.P.W., Paclík, P.: Prototype selection for dissimilarity-based classifiers. Pattern Recogn. 39(2), 189–208 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pękalska, E., Paclik, P., Duin, R.P.W.: A generalized kernel approach to dissimilarity-based classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 175–211 (2002)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Plasencia-Calaña, Y., García-Reyes, E.B., Duin, R.P.W., Orozco-Alzate, M.: On using asymmetry information for classification in extended dissimilarity spaces. In: Alvarez, L., Mejail, M., Gomez, L., Jacobo, J. (eds.) CIARP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7441, pp. 503–510. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Rahmani, R., Goldman, S., Zhang, H., Krettek, J., Fritts, J.: Localized content based image retrieval. In: Proc. of the 7th ACM SIGMM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval, pp. 227–236. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Riesen, K., Neuhaus, M., Bunke, H.: Graph embedding in vector spaces by means of prototype selection. In: Escolano, F., Vento, M. (eds.) GbRPR. LNCS, vol. 4538, pp. 383–393. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Schölkopf, B., Mika, S., Burges, C.J.C., Knirsch, P., Müller, K.R., Rätsch, G., Smola, A.J.: Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 10(5), 1000–1017 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tax, D.M.J., Loog, M., Duin, R.P.W., Cheplygina, V., Lee, W.-J.: Bag dissimilarities for multiple instance learning. In: Pelillo, M., Hancock, E.R. (eds.) SIMBAD 2011. LNCS, vol. 7005, pp. 222–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Plasencia-Calaña, Y. et al. (2013). On the Informativeness of Asymmetric Dissimilarities. In: Hancock, E., Pelillo, M. (eds) Similarity-Based Pattern Recognition. SIMBAD 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7953. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39140-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39140-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39139-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39140-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics