Skip to main content

Design and Assessment of a Reputation-Based Trust Framework in Wireless Testbeds Utilizing User Experience

  • Conference paper
Ad-hoc, Mobile, and Wireless Network (ADHOC-NOW 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 7960))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper a novel Trust and User Experience Framework (TUEF) that enables trustworthiness between users and testbeds is proposed. The proposed framework utilizes: (1) monitoring data from testbeds and (2) user experience data, stemming from users’ capability to provide feedback regarding their Quality of Experience (QoE) and service received. The applicability of the TUEF is demonstrated in a wireless testbed environment as a proof-of-concept implementation, while the performance evaluation is based on both real and simulated experiments. The results presented in this paper demonstrate that the proposed trust mechanism succeeds in delivering accurate reputation values even in the case where a large number of malicious users may provide false feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Grandison, T., Sloman, M.: A Survey of Trust in Internet Applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 3(4), 2–16 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Golbeck, J., Hendler, J.: Accuracy of Metrics for Inferring Trust and Reputation in Semantic Web-Based Social Networks. In: Motta, E., Shadbolt, N.R., Stutt, A., Gibbins, N. (eds.) EKAW 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3257, pp. 116–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technical Report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zacharia, G., Maes, P.: Trust management through reputation mechanisms. Applied Artificial Intelligence. An International Journal 14(9), 881–907 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alperovitch, D., Judge, P., Krasser, S.: Taxonomy of Email Reputation Systems. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, p. 27 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pan, J., Paul, S., Jain, R.: A Survey of the Research on Future Internet Architectures. IEEE Communications Magazine 49(7), 26–36 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gavras, A., Karila, A., Fdida, S., May, M., Potts, M.: Future Internet Research and Experimentation: The FIRE Initiative. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 37(3), 89–92 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. International Telecommunication Union. Definition of Quality of Experience. ITU-T Delayed Contribution D.197, Source: Nortel Networks, Canada, P. Coverdale (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience (QoE) (April 2012), http://www.qualinet.eu/images/stories/Newsletter_2012.pdf

  10. Law, E., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A., Kort, J.: Understanding, Scoping and Defining User eXperience: A Survey Approach. In: Proc. of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 719–728 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kamvar, S.D., Schlosser, M.T., Molina, H.G.: The EigenTrust Algorithm for Reputation Management in P2P Networks. In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, Budapest, pp. 640–651 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Garg, A., Battiti, R.: The Reputation, Opinion, Credibility and Quality (ROCQ) scheme. Technical Report DIT-04-104, University of Trento (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, H., Li, X.: H-Trust: A Robust and Lightweight Group Reputation System for Peer-to-Peer Desktop Grid. In: Proceedings of 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, Beijing, pp. 235–240 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quercia, D., Hailes, S.: MATE: Mobility and Adaptation with Trust and Expected-utility. International Journal of Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quercia, D., Lad, M., Hailes, S., Capra, L., Bhatti, S.: STRUDEL: Supporting Trust in the Dynamic Establishment of peering coalitions. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Dijon, France, pp. 1870–1874 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. NETMODE Wireless Testbed, http://www.netmode.ntua.gr/testbed

  17. Nagios, http://www.nagios.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kapoukakis, A., Pappas, C., Androulidakis, G., Papavassiliou, S. (2013). Design and Assessment of a Reputation-Based Trust Framework in Wireless Testbeds Utilizing User Experience. In: Cichoń, J., Gȩbala, M., Klonowski, M. (eds) Ad-hoc, Mobile, and Wireless Network. ADHOC-NOW 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7960. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39247-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39247-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39246-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39247-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics