Abstract
Context. Development of safety-critical systems is mostly governed by process-heavy paradigms, while increasing demands on flexibility and agility also reach this domain. Objectives. We wanted to explore in more detail the industrial needs and challenges when facing this trend. Method. We launched a qualitative survey, interviewing engineers from four companies in four different industry domains. Results. The survey identifies human factors (skills, experience, and attitudes) being key in safety-critical systems development, as well as good documentation. Certification cost is related to change frequency, which is limiting flexibility. Component reuse and iterative processes were found to increase adaptability to changing customer needs. Conclusions. We conclude that agile development and flexibility may co-exist with safety-critical software development, although there are specific challenges to address.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baufreton, P., Blanquart, J.P., Boulanger, J.L., Delseny, H., Derrien, J.C., Gassino, J., Ladier, G., Ledinot, E., Leeman, M., Quéré, P., Ricque, B.: Multi-domain comparison of safety standards. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (ERTS2), Toulouse, France (2010)
Beecham, S., Sharp, H., Baddoo, N., Hall, T., Robinson, H.: Does the XP environment meet the motivational needs of the software developer? An empirical study. In: AGILE 2007, pp. 37–48. IEEE CS (2007)
Flink, A.: The survey handbook, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications (2003)
Hawkins, R., Clegg, K., Alexander, R., Kelly, T.: Using a software safety argument pattern catalogue: Two case studies. In: Flammini, F., Bologna, S., Vittorini, V. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6894, pp. 185–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Jansen, H.: The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 11(2) (2010)
Kornecki, A., Zalewski, J.: Software certification for safety-critical systems: A status report. In: International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology, vol. 3, pp. 665–672. IEEE Computer Society (2008)
Land, R., Åkerholm, M., Carlson, J.: Efficient software component reuse in safety-critical systems – an empirical study. In: Ortmeier, F., Lipaczewski, M. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7612, pp. 388–399. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Leveson, N.: Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)
McHugh, M., McCaffery, F., Casey, V.: Barriers to adopting agile practices when developing medical device software. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2012. CCIS, vol. 290, pp. 141–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Pederson Notander, J., Runeson, P., Höst, M.: A model-based framework for flexible safety-critical software development – a design study. In: Proceedings of the 28th Symposium on Applied Computing, Coimbra, Portugal (2013)
Runeson, P., Höst, M., Rainer, A., Regnell, B.: Case Study Research in Software Engineering – Guidelines and Examples. Wiley (2012)
Turk, D., France, R., Rumpe, B.: Assumptions underlying agile software development processes. Journal of Database Management 16(4), 62–87 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pedersen Notander, J., Höst, M., Runeson, P. (2013). Challenges in Flexible Safety-Critical Software Development – An Industrial Qualitative Survey. In: Heidrich, J., Oivo, M., Jedlitschka, A., Baldassarre, M.T. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7983. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39259-7_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39259-7_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39258-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39259-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)