Abstract
Many disciplines in everyday life depend on improved performance in probability problems. Most adults struggle with conditional probability problems and prior studies have shown user accuracy is less than 50%. This study examined user performance when aided with computer-generated Venn and Euler-type diagrams in a non-learning context. Following relational complexity, working memory and mental model theories, this study manipulated problem complexity in diagrams and text-only displays. Partially consistent with the study hypotheses, complex visuals outperformed complex text-only displays and simple text-only displays outperformed complex text only displays. However, a significant interaction between users’ spatial ability and the use of diagram displays led to a reversal of performance for low-spatial users in one of the diagram displays. Participants with less spatial ability were significantly impaired in their ability to solve problems with less relational complexity when aided by a diagram.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U.: How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: frequency formats. Psychological Review 102, 684–701 (1995)
Kahnamen, D., Lovallo, D.: Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science 39(1), 17–31 (1993)
Sedlmeier, P.: How to improve statistical thinking: Choose the task wisely and learn by doing. Instructional Science 28, 227–262 (2000)
Baddeley, A.: Working memory. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1986)
Miyake, A., Shah, P.: An Introduction. In: Miyake, A., Shah, P. (eds.) Models of Working Memory. Cambridge University Press (1999)
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., Legrenzi, M.S.: Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review 106, 62–88 (1999)
Fangmeier, T., Knauff, M., Ruff, C., Sloutsky, V.: fMRI evidence for a three-stage model of deductive reasoning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(3), 320–334 (2006)
Knauff, M., Jola, C., Strube, G.: Spatial reasoning: No need for visual information. In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) COSIT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2205, pp. 447–457. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Ruff, C.C., Knauff, M., Fangmeier, T., Spreer, J.: Reasoning and working memory: Common and distinct neuronal processes. Neuropsychologia 41, 1241–1253 (2003)
Eddy, D.M.: Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In: Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A. (eds.) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, pp. 249–267. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U.: Overcoming difficulties in Bayesian Reasoning: A reply to Lewis & Keren and Mellers & McGraw. Psychological Review 106, 425–430 (1999)
Sloman, S.A., Over, D., Slovak, L., Stibel, J.M.: Frequency illusions and other fallacies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 91, 296–301 (2003)
Brase, G.L.: Pictorial representations in statistical reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology (2008), doi:10.1002/acp.1460
Calvillo, D.P., DeLeeuw, K.E., Revlin, R.: Deduction with Euler Circles: Diagrams That Hurt. In: Barker-Plummer, D., Cox, R., Swoboda, N. (eds.) Diagrams 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4045, pp. 199–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Halford, G.S., Wilson, W.H., Phillips, S.: Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (21), 803–865 (1998)
Cowan, N.: The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 87–185 (2000)
Cowan, N., Elliott, E.M., Saults, J.S., Morey, C.C., Mattox, S., Hismjatullina, A., Conway, A.R.: On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology 51, 42–100 (2005)
Brase, G.L., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J.: Individuation, counting, and statistical inference: the role of frequency and whole-object representations in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127(1), 3–21 (1998)
Klauer, K.C., Stegmaier, R., Meiser, T.: Working memory involvement in propositional and spatial reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 3(1), 9–47 (1997)
Cowan, N.: What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? In: Sossin, W.S., Lacaille, J.-C., Castellucci, V.F., Belleville, S. (eds.) Progress in Brain Research, vol. 169. Elsevier B.V. (2008)
Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63, 81–97 (1956)
Halford, G.S., Wilson, W.H., Phillips, S.: Relational knowledge: The foundation of higher cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(11), 497–505 (2010)
Kroger, J.K., Sabb, F.W., Fales, C.I., Bookheimer, S.Y., Cohen, M.S., Holyoak, K.J.: Recruitment of anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human reasoning: a parametric study of relational complexity. Cerebral Cortex 12, 477–485 (2002)
Halford, G.S., Cowan, N., Andrews, G.: Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: A new hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Science 11(6), 236–242 (2007)
Hegarty, M.: Individual differences in use of diagrams as memory in mechanical reasoning. Learning and Individual Differences 9(1), 19–42 (1997)
Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H.: Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service, Princeton (1976)
Hegarty, M., Waller, D.: Individual differences in spatial ability. In: Shah, P., Miyake, A. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, pp. 121–169. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Rettinger, D.A., Shah, P., Hegarty, M.: How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130(4), 621–640 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kellen, V., Chan, S., Fang, X. (2013). Improving User Performance in Conditional Probability Problems with Computer-Generated Diagrams. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Contexts of Use. HCI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8006. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39265-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39265-8_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39264-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39265-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)