Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decision Theory and Rules of Thumb

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human-Centric Decision-Making Models for Social Sciences

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 502))

  • 1474 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a relatively new and rapidly developing interdisciplinary theory of decision making, the theory of fast and frugal heuristics. It is first shown how the theory complements most of the standard theories of decision making in the social sciences such as Bayesian expected utility theory and its variants: Fast and frugal heuristics are not derived from normatively compelling axioms but are inspired by the simple rules of thumb that people and animals have been empirically found to use. The theory is illustrated by presenting the basic concepts and mathematics of some fast and frugal heuristics such as the recognition heuristic, the take-the-best heuristic, and fast and frugal trees. Then, applications of fast and frugal heuristics in a number of problems are described (how do laypeople make investment decisions? how do military staff identify unexploded ordnance buried in the ground? how do doctors decide whether to admit a patient to the emergency care or not?) It is emphasized that there are no good or bad decision models per se but that all models can work well in some situations and not in others, and thus the goal is to find the right model for each situation. Accordingly, in all applications, the performance of fast and frugal heuristics is compared, by computer simulations and mathematical analyses, to the performance of standard models such as Bayesian networks, classification-and-regression trees and support-vector machines. Finally, ways of combining standard decision theory and rules of thumb are discussed.

Chapter for the book Human-Centric Decision-Making Models for Social Sciences, Edited by Peijun Guo and Witold Pedrycz.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baucells, M., Carrasco, J.A., Hogarth, R.M.: Cumulative dominance and heuristic performance in binary multi-attribute choice. Oper. Res. 56, 1289–1304 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Benartzi, S., Thaler, R.H.: Naïve diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(1), 79–98 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd, R., Richerson, P.J.: The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, C.J., Olshen, R.A.: Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brighton, H.: Robust inference with simple cognitive models. In: Lebiere, C., Wray, R. (eds.) AAAI Spring Symposium: Cognitive Science Principles Meet AI-Hard Problems, pp. 17–22. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Broeder, A., Newell, B.R.: Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor. Judgment Decis. Mak. 3(3), 205–214 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cook, L.: The world trade center attack–the paramedic response: an insider’s view. Critical Care 5, 301–303 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Czerlinski, J., Gigerenzer, G., Goldstein, D.G.: How good are simple heuristics? In: Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M. (eds.) & the ABC Research Group, Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart, pp. 97–118. Oxford University Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dhami, M.K.: Psychological models of professional decision-making. Psychol. Sci. 14, 175–180 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dhami, M.K., Harries, C.: Fast and frugal versus regression models in human judgement. Think. Reason. 7, 5–27 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dawes, R.M.: The robust beauty of improper linear models. Am. Psychol. 34, 571–582 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dawes, R.M., Corrigan, B.: Linear models in decision making. Psychol. Bull. 81(2), 95–106 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., Uppal, R.: Optimal versus naïve diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Rev. Financial Studies 22, 1915–1953 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Domingos, P., Pazzani, M.: On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Machine Learning 29, 103–130 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Dorans, N., Drasgow, F.: Alternative weighting schemes for linear prediction. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perfor. 21, 316–345 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dougherty, M.R., Franco-Watkins, A.M., Thomas, R.: Psychological plausibility of the theory of probabilistic mental models and the fast and frugal heuristics. Psychol. Rev. 115, 199–213 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Edwards, W., Fasolo, B.: Decision technology. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 52(1), 581–606 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Einhorn, H.J., Hogarth, R.M.: Unit weighting schemes for decision making. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 13, 171–192 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandez, J.P., Katsikopoulos, K.V., Shubitizde, F.: Detecting unexploded ordnance by fast and frugal trees. (Unpublished manuscript), Dartmouth College,Hanover (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fishburn, P.C.: Lexicographic orders, decisions, and utilities: A survey. Manag. Sci. 20, 1442–1471 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Ford, J., Schmitt, N., Schechtman, S.L., Hults, B.H., Dogherty, M.L.: Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions. Organ. Behav.Hum. Decis.Process. 43(1), 75–117 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gigerenzer, G., Brighton, H.: Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Top. Cogn. Sci. 1, 107–143 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gigerenzer, G., Goldstein, D.G.: Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychol. Rev. 103(4), 650–669 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gigerenzer, G., Goldstein, D.G.: The recognition heuristic: A decade of research. Judgment Decis. Mak. 6(1), 100–121 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., Pachur, T. (eds.): Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior. Oxford University Press, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goldstein, D.G., Gigerenzer, G.: Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychol. Rev. 109, 75–90 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gould, J.L., Gould, C.G.: The Honey Bee. Scientific American Library, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Green, L., Mehr, D.R.: What alters physicians’ decisions to admit to the coronary care unit? The J. Family Pract. 45, 219–226 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hogarth, R.M., Karelaia, N.: Simple models for multiattribute choice with many alternatives: When it does and does not pay to face tradeoffs with binary attributes? Manag. Sci. 51(12), 1860–1872 (2005a)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Hogarth, R.M., Karelaia, N.: Ignoring information in binary choice with continuous variables: When is less "more”? J. Math. Psychol. 49(2), 115–124 (2005b)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Hogarth, R.M., Karelaia, N.: Regions of rationality: Maps for bounded agents. Decis. Anal. 3, 124–144 (2006a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hogarth, R.M., Karelaia, N.: "Take-the-best” and other simple strategies: Why and when they work "well” with binary cues. Theory and Decis. 61, 205–249 (2006b)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Hogarth, R.M., Karelaia, N.: Heuristic and linear models of judgment: Matching rules and environments. Psychol. Rev. 114(3), 733–758 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Holte, R.C.: Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Machine Learning 3(11), 63–91 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hutchinson, J.M.C., Gigerenzer, G.: Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behav. Process. 69, 97–124 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A. (eds.): Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Katsikopoulos, K.V.: Don’t take gurus too seriously: Review of "A Science of Decision Making: The Legacy of Ward Edwards” (Eds. J. W. Weiss and D. J. Weiss). J. Math. Psychol. 54, 401–403 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Katsikopoulos, K.V.: The less-is-more effect: Predictions and tests. Judgment Decis. Mak. 5(4), 244–257 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Katsikopoulos, K.V.: Psychological heuristics for making inferences: Definition, performance, and the emerging theory and practice. Decis. Anal. 8(1), 10–29 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Katsikopoulos, K.V.: Multi-attribute choice: An analysis of when to use heuristics. (Unpublished manuscript), Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Katsikopoulos, K.V., Fasolo, B.: New tools for decision analysts. IEEE Transact. Syst. Man, Cybernetics: Syst. Hum. 36(5), 960–967 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Katsikopoulos, K.V., Martignon, L.: Naïve heuristics for paired comparison: Some results on their relative accuracy. J. Math Psychol. 50, 488–494 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Katsikopoulos, K.V., Schooler, L.J., Hertwig, R.: The robust beauty of mediocre information. Psychol. Rev. 117(4), 1259–1266 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decision-making with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kelman, M.G.: The Heuristics Debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Klein, G.A., Calderwood, R.: Decision models: Some lessons from the field. IEEE Transact. Syst. Man, Cybernetics 21(5), 1018–1026 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Laland, K.N.: Imitation, social learning, and preparedness as mechanisms of bounded rationality. In: Gigerenzer, G., Selten, R. (eds.) Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Long, W.J., Griffith, J.L., Selker, H.P., D’Agostino, R.B.: A comparison of logistic regression to decision-tree induction in a medical domain. Comput. Biomedical Res. 26, 74–97 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lovie, A.D., Lovie, P.: The flat maximum effect and linear scoring models for prediction. J. Forecasting 5, 159–168 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mallon, E.B., Franks, N.R.: Ants estimate area using Buffon’s needle. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Series B 267, 765–770 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Markowitz, H.M.: Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7, 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Martignon, L., Hoffrage, U.: Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparison. Theory Decis. 52, 29–71 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Martignon, L., Katsikopoulos, K.V., Woike, J.: Categorization with limited resources: A family of simple heuristics. J. Math. Psychol. 52(6), 352–361 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Ortmann, A., Gigerenzer, G., Borges, B., and Goldstein, D. G.: The recognition heuristic: A fast and frugal way to investment choice? In: Plott, C. R. and Smith, V. L. (eds.) Handbook of Experimental Economics Results: Vol. 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Pachur, T., Broeder, A., Marewski, J.N.: The recognition heuristic in memory-based inference: Is recognition a non-compensatory cue? J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 21, 183–210 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Pichert, D., Katsikopoulos, K.V.: Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 28, 63–73 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Quinlan, J.R.: Decision trees and decision-making. IEEE Transact. Syst. Man, Cybernetics 20, 339–346 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Raiffa, H., Schleifer, R.: Applied Statistical Decision Theory, Harvard University Press, Boston(1961)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Reimer, T., Katsikopoulos, K.V.: The use of recognition in group decision-making. Cogn. Sci. 28, 1009–1029 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Savage, L.J.: The Foundations of Statistics. Yale University Press, New Haven (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Simon, H.A.: A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69, 99–118 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Simon, H.A.: Rational choice and the structure of environments. Psychol. Rev. 63, 129–138 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Heuristics and biases: Judgment under uncertainty. Science 185, 1124–1130 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Vapnik, V.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, Newyork (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Vlek, C.: What constitutes a good decision?A panel discussion among Ward Edwards, Istvan Kiss, Giandomenico Majone, and Masanao Toda. Acta Psychol. 56, 5–27 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. von Winterfeldt, D. Edwards, W.: Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge(1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition (ABC), Lentzeallee 94, 14195, Berlin, Germany

    Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos

Authors
  1. Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business Administration, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan

    Peijun Guo

  2. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Witold Pedrycz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Katsikopoulos, K.V. (2014). Decision Theory and Rules of Thumb. In: Guo, P., Pedrycz, W. (eds) Human-Centric Decision-Making Models for Social Sciences. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 502. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39307-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39307-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39306-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39307-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation