Abstract
While making a decision to maximize the expected utility is among the prime examples of human intelligence, the ultimatum game showcases a social dilemma where people sacrifice their economic self-interest in the presence of negative emotions. In the present study, we explore human cognitive-affective interactions in strategic thinking from an integrated neurocomputational perspective. We manipulated participants’ emotions by inducing incidental affective states in the ultimatum game. We found that participants’ rejection rates of unfair offers were significantly lower in positive valence emotions (“happy” and “calm”) than in negative valence emotions (“sad” and “anxious”). In addition, the reduction of rejection rates appeared to be independent of the arousal level (high arousal in “happy” and “anxious” versus low arousal in “calm” and “sad”). Our results suggested that positive valence emotions, by broadening people’s evaluations of decision perspectives and alleviating the perception of unfairness, may help people regain focus on their economic self-interest.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Camerer, C.F., Fehr, E.: When does "economic man" dominate social behavior? Science 311(5757), 47–52 (2006)
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B.: An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3(4), 367–388 (1982)
Camerer, C.F.: Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2003)
Zhou, X., Wu, Y.: Sharing losses and sharing gains: Increased demand for fairness under adversity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47(3), 582–588 (2011)
Handgraaf, M.J.J., et al.: Evaluability of outcomes in ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 95(1), 97–106 (2004)
Nowak, M.A., Page, K.M., Sigmund, K.: Fairness versus reason in the Ultimatum Game. Science 289(5485), 1773–1775 (2000)
Rabin, M.: Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American Economic Review 83(5), 1281–1302 (1993)
Knoch, D., et al.: A neural marker of costly punishment behavior. Psychological Science 21(3), 337–342 (2010)
Knoch, D., et al.: Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science 314(5800), 829–832 (2006)
Knoch, D., et al.: Disrupting the prefrontal cortex diminishes the human ability to build a good reputation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(49), 20895–20899 (2009)
Straub, P.G., Murnighan, J.K.: An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 27(3), 345–364 (1995)
Blount, S.: When social outcomes aren’t fair: The effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63(2), 131–144 (1995)
Pillutla, M.M., Murnighan, J.K.: Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 68(3), 208–224 (1996)
Mikula, G., Scherer, K.R., Athenstaedt, U.: The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24(7), 769–783 (1998)
Sanfey, A.G.: Social decision-making: Insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science 318(5850), 598–602 (2007)
Sanfey, A.G., et al.: The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 300(5626), 1755–1758 (2003)
Wang, H., Coble, C., Bello, P.: Cognitive-affective interactions in human decision-making: A neurocomputational approach. In: Sun, R., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2341–2346. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2006)
Fredrickson, B.L.: The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 359(1449), 1367–1377 (2004)
Jefferies, L.N., et al.: Emotional valence and arousal interact in attentional control. Psychological Science 19(3), 290–295 (2008)
Mitterschiffthaler, M.T., et al.: A functional MRI study of happy and sad affective states induced by classical music. Human Brain Mapping 28(11), 1150–1162 (2007)
van Dijk, E., Vermunt, R.: Strategy and fairness in social decision making: Sometimes it pays to be powerless. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36(1), 1–25 (2000)
Bechara, A., et al.: Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50(1-3), 7–15 (1994)
Weber, E.U., Johnson, E.J.: Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 60(1), 53–85 (2009)
Damasio, A.R.: Fundamental feelings. Nature 413(6858), 781 (2001)
Kringelbach, M.L.: The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6(9), 691–702 (2005)
Garland, E.L., et al.: Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: Insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review 30(7), 849–864 (2010)
Clore, G.L., Huntsinger, J.R.: How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(9), 393–399 (2007)
Burgdorf, J., Panksepp, J.: The neurobiology of positive emotions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 30(2), 173–187 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sun, Y., Wang, H. (2013). Cognitive-Affective Interactions in Strategic Decision Making. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Fidopiastis, C.M. (eds) Foundations of Augmented Cognition. AC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8027. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39454-6_55
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39454-6_55
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39453-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39454-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)