Skip to main content

A Multi-criteria and Multi-group Analysis for Historic District Quality Assessment

  • Conference paper
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2013 (ICCSA 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7974))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this research paper we try to integrate different stakeholders’ targets and feelings to build a shared vision for the future development of the city, through the evaluation of district visual quality. The proposed methodological framework consists of some assessment steps, which combine tools of sociological research and decision-making support systems, in particular the Analytic Hierarchy Process. This proposal is aimed to identify priority strategies to be implemented in urban development policies for the preservation and the enhancement of cultural heritage. We use the AHP for analysing the problem, identifying the domains and prioritizing the areas in which most urgent intervention (redevelopment or transformation) are needed, in order to improve the attractiveness of the city, through bottom-up approach that allows to map out the performance of city development initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Porter, M., Kramer, M.: Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review (January-February 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Licciardi, G., Amirtahmasebi, R.: The Economics of Uniqueness: Historic Cities and Cultural Heritage Assets as Public Goods. World Bank, Washington, DC (2012), doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-9650-6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Montrone, S., Perchinunno, P., Torre, C.M.: Analysis of Positional Aspects in the Variation of Real Estate Values in an Italian Southern Metropolitan Area. In: Taniar, D., Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Pardede, E., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6016, pp. 17–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Rotondo, F., Selicato, F.: E-Democracy in Collaborative Planning: A Critical Review. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Iglesias, A., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6783, pp. 199–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Fusco Girard, L., Nijkamp, P.: Le valutazioni per lo sviluppo sostenibile della città e del territorio, Angeli, Milano, Italy (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Marchi, B., Funtowicz, S.O., Lo Cascio, S., Munda, G.: Combining partecipative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecological Economics 34, 267–282 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zube, E.H.: Environmental evaluation: Perception and public policy. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Monterey, CA (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daniel, T.C., Vining, J.: Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. In: Altman, I., Wohlwill, J. (eds.) Behavior and the Natural Landscape. Plenum Press, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pérez, J.G.: Ascertaining landscape perceptions and preferences with pair-wise photographs: planning rural tourism in Extremadura. Spain. Landscape Res. 27, 297–308 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shelby, B., Harris, R.: Comparing methods for determining visitor evaluations of ecological impacts site visits, photography, and written descriptions. J. Leisure Res. 17, 57–67 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zube, E.H., Sell, J.L., Taylor, J.G.: Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landsc. Plan. 9, 1–33 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daniel, T.C.: Whither scenic beauty? visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape Urban Plan 25, 267–281 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Danese, M., Nolè, G., Murgante, B.: Visual Impact Assessment in urban planning. In: Murgante, B., Borruso, G., Lapucci, A. (eds.) Geocomputation and Urban Planning. SCI, vol. 176, pp. 133–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Streetscapes Research Group, Streetscapes. Their contribution to wealth creation and quality of life - Final Report, The Robert Gordon University, The Macaulay Institute (November 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Piscitelli, C., Selicato, F.: The role of collaborative planning practices in building new institutional powers and achieving community empowerment. In: Scutelnicu, E., Rotondo, F., Varum, H. (eds.) Recent Advances in Engineering Mechanics, Structures & Urban Planning, pp. 120–125. WSEAS Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bignante, E.: The use of photo-elicitation in field research. EchoGéo (2010), http://echogeo.revues.org/11622 , doi:10.4000/echogeo.11622

  17. Oware, E., Diefes-Dux, H.A., Adams, R.A.: Photo-elicitation as a research methodology for investigating conceptions of engineering. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual ASEE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education, Istanbul, Turkey (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Streetscapes Research Group, Streetscapes. Their contribution to wealth creation and quality of life - Final Report, The Robert Gordon University, The Macaulay Institute (November 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaplan, S., Kaplan, R.: Humanscape: Environments for People. Ulrich’s, Ann Arbor (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hudspeth, T.R.: Visual preference as a tool for facilitating citizen participation in urban waterfront revitalization. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 23(4), 373–385 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kingston, R.: Web based GIS for public participation decision making in the UK, paper presented at the National Centre for Geographic Information and Analysis. Santa Barbara, Michigan (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Briggs, D.J., France, J.: Landscape evaluation: a comparative study. J. Environ. Manage. 10, 263–275 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hull, R.B., Stewart, W.P.: Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgements. J. Environ. Psychol. 12, 101–114 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nijkamp, P., Kourtit, K., de Kleijn, M.: Facebook 4 Urban Facelift. PhD course workshop presentation, Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II (July 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Daniel, T.C.: Measuring the quality of the natural environment. Am. Psychol. 45, 633–637 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smit, A.J.: The Influence of District Visual Quality on Location Decisions of Creative Entrepreneurs. Journal of the American Planning Association 77(2), 167–184 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Saaty, T.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences 1(1), 83–98 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Fusco Girard, L., Torre, C.M.: The Use of AHP in a Multiactor Evaluation for Urban Development Programs: A Case Study. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 157–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Cerreta, M., De Toro, P.: Assessing urban transformations: A SDSS for the master plan of Castel Capuano, Naples. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 168–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Attardi, R., De Rosa, F., Di Palma, M., Piscitelli, C. (2013). A Multi-criteria and Multi-group Analysis for Historic District Quality Assessment. In: Murgante, B., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2013. ICCSA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7974. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39649-6_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39649-6_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39648-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39649-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics