Skip to main content

A Spatial Multicriteria Assessment Decision Support System (SMCA-DSS) for East Naples: Towards a Water Opportunity Map

  • Conference paper
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2013 (ICCSA 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7974))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The objective of this study is to present the methodological process for the elaboration of a Spatial Multicriteria Assessment Decision Support System (SMCA-DSS) oriented to the definition of a Water Opportunity Map for a Naples Eastern Area, in Italy. The proposed approach extends the formalization of multicriteria methods and social network analysis in Geographical Information Systems (GIS), including spatial structure and temporal dynamics. The combined application can be useful in spatial decision making process for urban planning, supporting and modelling operations for urban land-use change. Analysing the opportunities for the storm-water management, the paper explores possible shared scenarios of transformations identifying the main effects on the local context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. de Graaf, R.E.: Innovations in urban water management to reduce the vulnerability of cities. In: Feasibility, Case Studies and Governance, Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Brugge, R., Rotmans, J., Loorbach, D.: The transition in Dutch water management. Regional Environmental Change 5, 164–176 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, R.R., Clarke, J.M.: Transition to water sensitive urban design: The story of Melbourne, Australia. Report 07/1, Facility for Advancing Water Biofiltration, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. SWITCH: Preliminary report on integration with existing infrastructure. Deliverable 1.3.1. Switch project. Sustainable Water Management in the City of the Future, University of Abertay Dundee, Scotland, UK (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Butler, D., Parkinson, J.: Towards sustainable urban drainage. Water Science and Technology 35(9), 53–63 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Niemczynowicz, J.: Urban hydrology and water management. Present and future challenges. Urban Water 1, 1–14 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geldof, G.D., Stahre, P.: On the road to a new stormwater planning approach: from Model A to Model B. Water Practice and Technology 1 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Starkl, M., Brunner, N., Flo, W., Wimmer, J.: Design of an institutional decision-making process: The case of urban water management. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 1030–1042 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Soderberg, H., Johansson, M.: Institutional capacity: the key to successful implementation. In: Malmqvist, P.-A., Heinicke, G., Karrman, E., Stenstrom, T.-A., Svensson, G. (eds.) Strategic Planning of Sustainable Urban Water Management. IWA Publishing, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wong, T.H.F.: Water Sensitive Urban Design, The Journey thus far. Australian Journal of Water Resources 10, 213–222 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wong, T.H.F., Brown, R.R.: Transitioning to Water Sensitive Cities: Ensuring Resilience through a new Hydro-Social Contract. In: Proceedings 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pahl-Wostl, C.: Information, public empowerment, and the management of urban watersheds. Environmental Modelling and Software 20, 457–467 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pahl-Wostl, C.: Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resources Management 21, 49–62 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown, R.R., Farrelly, M., Keath, N.: Practitioner perceptions of social and institutional barriers to advancing a diverse water source approach in Australia. Water Resources Development 25(1), 15–28 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown, R.R., Keath, N., Wong, T.: Transitioning to Water Sensitive Cities: Historical, Current and Future Transition States. In: Proceedings 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kotz, C., Hiessl, H.: Analysis of system innovation in urban water infrastructure systems: an agent-based modeling approach. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 5, 135–144 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hegger, D.L.T., van Vliet, B.J.M., Spaargaren, G.: Decentralized Sanitation and Reuse in Dutch Society. Social opportunties and risks. Wageningen University, the Netherlands (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Geels, F.W.: Co-evolution of technology and society: the multilevel perspective and a case study, the transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930). Technology in Society 27(3), 363–397 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Geels, F.W.: The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840–1930): The dynamics of regime transformation. Research Policy 35, 1069–1082 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., Van Asselt, M.: Transition Management in Public Policy. Foresight 3, 15–31 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Swart, R.: Climate Change: Managing the Risks. Free University, Amsterdam (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rotmans, J., Dowlatabadi, H.: Integrated Assessment Modelling. In: Rayner, S., Malone, E. (eds.) Human Choice and Climate Change, vol. 3, pp. 291–378. Battelle Press, Columbus (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. McIntosh, B.S., Giupponi, C., Voinov, A.A., Smith, C., Matthews, K.B., Monticino, M.: Bridging the Gap: Developing Tools for Environmental Policy and Management. In: Jakeman, T., Rizzoli, A.E., Voinov, A.A., Chen, S.H. (eds.) State of the Art and Futures in Environmental Modelling and Software. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Geneletti, D.: A GIS-Based Decision Support System to Identify Nature Conservation Priorities in an Alpine Valley. Land Use Policy 21, 149–160 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Geneletti, D., van Duren, I.: Protected Area Zoning for Conservation and Use: A Combination of Spatial Multicriteria and Multiobjective Evaluation. Landscape Urban Plan 85, 97–110 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cerreta, M., Panaro, S., Cannatella, D.: Multidimensional spatial decision-making process: Local shared values in action. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 54–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Cerreta, M., Mele, R.: A landscape complex value map: integration among soft values and hard values in a spatial decision support. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 653–669. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Cerreta, M., De Toro, P.: Assessing urban transformations: A SDSS for the master plan of Castel Capuano, Naples. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 168–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Perchinunno, P., Rotondo, F., Torre, C.M.: A multivariate fuzzy analysis for the regeneration of urban poverty areas. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Laganà, A., Taniar, D., Mun, Y., Gavrilova, M.L. (eds.) ICCSA 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5072, pp. 137–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Murgante, B., Tilio, L., Lanza, V., Scorza, F.: Using participative GIS and e-tools for involving citizens of Marmo Platano – Melandro area in European programming activities. Journal of Balkans and Near Eastern Studies 13(1), 97–115 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Geldof, G.D.: Coping with complexity in integrated water management. On the road to Interactive Implementation. Tauw. Deventer, The Netherlands (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hooimeijer, F., van der Toorn Vrijthoff, W.: More Urban Water: Design and Management of Dutch Water Cities. Taylor and Francis Group, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Department of Water: Urban water management plans. Guidelines for preparing plans and for complying with subdivision conditions. Government of Western Australia, Perth Western Australia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Department of Water: Water monitoring guidelines for better urban water management strategies/plans. Government of Western Australia, Perth Western Australia (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reinhard, S., Folmer, H.: Water Policy in the Netherlands. Integrated Management in a Densely Populated Delta. Ariel Dinar, Washington (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Saaty, T.L.: Multicriteria decision making – The analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bots, P.W.G., van Twist, M.J.W., van Duin, J.H.R.: Designing a Power Tool for Policy Analysts: Dynamic Actor Network Analysis. In: Nunamaker, J.F., Sprague, R.H. (eds.) Proceedings HICSS-32, IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cerreta, M., De Toro, P.: Integrated spatial assessment for a creative decision-making process: A combined methodological approach to strategic environmental assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Development 13(1-2), 17–30 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cerreta, M., De Toro, P.: Urbanization Suitability Maps: A Dynamic Spatial Decision Support System for Sustainable Land Use. Earth System Dynamics 3, 157–171 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Marinoni, O.: Implementation of the analytic hierarchy process with VBA in ArcGIS. Computer and Geosciences 30, 637–646 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Marinoni, O., Hoppe, A.: Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to support sustainable use of georesources in metropolitan areas. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 15, 154–164 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zelenović Vasiljevic, T., Srdjević, Z., Bajčetić, R., Vojinović Miloradov, M.: GIS and the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Regional Landfill Site Selection in Transitional Countries: A Case Study From Serbia. Environmental Management 49, 445–458 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cerreta, M., De Toro, P.: Integrated Spatial Assessment (ISA): A Multi-Methodological Approach for Planning Choices. In: Burian, J. (ed.) Advances in Spatial Planning, pp. 77–108. InTec, Rijeka (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bots, P.W.G., Van Twist, M.J.W., Van Duin, J.H.R.: Automatic Pattern Detection in Stakeholder Networks. In: Nunamaker, F., Sprague, J.R.H. (eds.) Proceedings 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Golub, A.L.: Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. John Wiley, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Brouwer, R., van Ek, R.: Integrated Ecological, Economic and Social Impact Assessment of Alternative Flood Control Policies in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics 50, 1–21 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Janssen, R., Goosen, H., Verhoeven, M.L., Verhoeven, J.T.A., Omtzigt, A.Q.A., Maltby, E.: Decision Support for Integrated Wetland Management. Environmental Modelling and Software 20, 215–229 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. van der Sluijs, J.P.: A Way Out of the Credibility Crisis of Models Used in Integrated Environmental Assessment. Futures 34, 133–146 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Joerin, F., Theriault, F., Musy, A.: Using GIS and Outranking Multicriteria Analysis for Land-Use Suitability Assessment. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15, 153–174 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rotondo, F.: Geographical Information Systems and Ontologies: Two Instruments for Building Spatial Analysis Systems. In: Phillips-Wren, G., Jain, L.C., Nakamatsu, K., Howlett, R.J. (eds.) IDT 2010. SIST, vol. 4, pp. 319–328. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Murgante, B., Borruso, G., Lapucci, A.: Sustainable Development: concepts and methods for its application in urban and environmental planning. In: Murgante, B., Borruso, G., Lapucci, A. (eds.) Geocomputation, Sustainability and Environmental Planning. SCI, vol. 348, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Tilio, L., Murgante, B., Di Trani, F., Vona, M., Masi, A.: Mitigation of urban vulnerability through a spatial multicriteria approach. Disaster Advances 5(3), 138–143 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Al-Shalabi, M.A., Bin Mansor, S., Bin Ahmed, N., Shiriff, R.: GIS Based Multicriteria Approaches to Housing Site Suitability Assessment. Paper Presented to the XXIII FIG Congress, Munich, Germany, October 8-13. Shaping the Change (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cerreta, M., De Toro, P.: Strategic Environmental Assessment of Port Plans in Italy: Experiences, Approaches, Tools. Sustainability 4(11), 2888–2921 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Fusco Girard, L., Torre, C.M.: The Use of Ahp in a Multiactor Evaluation for Urban Development Programs: A Case Study. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 157–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  57. Attardi, R., Bonifazi, A., Torre, C.M.: Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases. Sustainability 4(11), 3042–3065 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cerreta, M., De Rosa, F., Di Palma, M., Inglese, P., Poli, G. (2013). A Spatial Multicriteria Assessment Decision Support System (SMCA-DSS) for East Naples: Towards a Water Opportunity Map. In: Murgante, B., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2013. ICCSA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7974. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39649-6_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39649-6_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39648-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39649-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics