Skip to main content

Where Wall-Following Works: Case Study of Simple Heuristics vs. Optimal Exploratory Behaviour

  • Conference paper
Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems (Living Machines 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8064))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Behaviours in autonomous agents – animals and robots – can be categorised according to whether they follow predetermined stimulus-response rules or make decisions based on explicit models of the world. Probability theory shows that optimal utility actions can in general be made only by considering all possible future states of world models. What is the relationship between rule-following and optimal utility modelling agents? We consider a particular case of an active mapping agent using two strategies: a simple wall-following rule and full Bayesian utility maximisation via entropy-based exploration. We show that for a class of environments generated by Ising models which include parameters modelling typical robotic mazes, the rule-following strategy tends to approximate optimal action selection but requires far less computation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braitenberg, V.: Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. Bradford Bks. MIT Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carlone, L., Du, J., Ng, M.K., Bona, B., Indri, M.: An application of Kullback-Leibler divergence to active SLAM and exploration with particle filters. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 287–293 (October 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fox, C., Evans, M., Pearson, M.J., Prescott, T.J.: Towards hierarchical blackboard mapping on a whiskered robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 60, 1356–1366 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Daw, N.D., Niv, Y., Dayan, P.: Uncertainty-based competition between prefrontal and dorsolateral striatum systems for behavioral control. Nature Neuroscience 8, 1704–1711 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fox, C.: Formalising robotic ethical reasoning as decision heuristics. In: Proc. First UK Workshop on Robot Ethics, Sheffield (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fox, C.W., Evans, M.H., Pearson, M.J., Prescott, T.J.: Tactile SLAM with a biomimetic whiskered robot. In: ICRA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., ABC Group: Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford University Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glasserman, P.: Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering. Springer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hinton, G.E., Osinderoi, S., Teh, Y.-W.: A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation 18 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hosterrer, G., Thomas, G.: Evaluation of enhanced thigmotaxis as a condition of impaired maze learning by rats with hippocampal lesions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 63(1), 105–110 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kahneman, D.: Thinking Fast and Slow. Macmillan (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Langton, C.G.: Studying artificial life with cellular automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 22(1-3), 120–149 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. MacKay, D.J.C.: Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchinson, B., Pearson, M.J., Pipe, A.G., Prescott, T.J.: The emergence of action sequences from spatial attention: Insight from rodent-like robots. In: Prescott, T.J., Lepora, N.F., Mura, A., Verschure, P.F.M.J. (eds.) Living Machines 2012. LNCS, vol. 7375, pp. 168–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Saigol, Z.: Automated Planning for Hydrothermal Vent Prospeting using AUVS. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, UK (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strauss, P.: Roombas make dazzling time-lapse light paintings, http://technabob.com/blog/2009/09/29/roomba-time-lapse-art/

  17. Taylor, M., Fox, C.: Inventory management with dynamic bayesian network software systems. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2011. LNBIP, vol. 87, pp. 290–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fox, C. (2013). Where Wall-Following Works: Case Study of Simple Heuristics vs. Optimal Exploratory Behaviour. In: Lepora, N.F., Mura, A., Krapp, H.G., Verschure, P.F.M.J., Prescott, T.J. (eds) Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems. Living Machines 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8064. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39802-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39802-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39801-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39802-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics