Skip to main content

Preference Handling for Belief-Based Rational Decisions

  • Conference paper
Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8148))

  • 1045 Accesses

Abstract

We introduce an approach to preferences suitable for agents that base decisions on their beliefs. In our work, agents’ preferences are perceived as a consequence of their beliefs, but at the same time are used to feed the knowledge base with beliefs about preferences. As a result, agents can reason with preferences to hypothesize, explain decisions, and review preferences in face of new information. Finally, we integrate utility-based to reasoning-based criteria of decision making.

This is a reviewed and extended version of [10] focused on single agent decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brafman, R.I.: Relational preference rules for control. Artif. Intell. 175(7-8), 1180–1193 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Dietrich, F., List, C.: A reason-based theory of rational choice*. Noûs 47(1), 104–134 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Domshlak, C., Hüllermeier, E., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Preferences in AI: An overview. Artif. Intell. 175(7-8), 1037–1052 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Doyle, J.: Prospects for preferences. Computational Intelligence 20(2), 111–136 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Bonnefon, J.-F.: On the qualitative comparison of decisions having positive and negative features. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 32, 385–417 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fishburn, P.C.: Preference structures and their numerical representations. Theor. Comput. Sci. 217(2), 359–383 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Labreuche, C.: A general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference model. Artif. Intell. 175(7-8), 1410–1448 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lafage, C., Lang, J.: Logical representation of preferences for group decision making. In: Cohn, A.G., Giunchiglia, F., Selman, B. (eds.) KR, pp. 457–468. Morgan Kaufmann (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sá, S., Alcântara, J.: Preferences with qualitative thresholds and methods for individual and collective decisions (extended abstract). In: Ito, onker, Gini, Shehory (eds.) AAMAS. IFAAMAS (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sá, S., Alcântara, J. (2013). Preference Handling for Belief-Based Rational Decisions. In: Cabalar, P., Son, T.C. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8148. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_51

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40563-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40564-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics