Skip to main content

A Common-Recipe and Conflict-Solving MAP Approach for Care Planning in Comorbid Patients

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (CAEPIA 2013)

Abstract

The knowledge for managing diseases is usually compiled in single-disease clinical guidelines (CG). These CGs are not directly reusable for managing comorbid patients, who suffer from more than one disease. This is because some interactions may exist between the different involved CGs. However, some common high-level activities can be found in the different CGs. In this work we present a Multi-Agent Planning (MAP) approach which encodes these common activities in a common recipe used by planning agents to firstly obtain local solutions and then applying a conflict solving procedure over them. An experimental evaluation has been carried out to test the validity of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyd, C.M., Darer, J., Boult, C., Fried, L.P., Boult, L., Wu, A.W.: Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 294(6), 716–724 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. GuideLine INteraction detection architecture, http://glindaproject.stanford.edu/

  3. Peleg, M., Tu, S., Bury, J., Ciccarese, P., Fox, J., Greenes, R.A., Hall, R., Johnson, P.D., Jones, N., Kumar, A., et al.: Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10(1), 52–68 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fdez-Olivares, J., Castillo, L., Cózar, J.A., García Pérez, O.: Supporting clinical processes and decisions by hierarchical planning and scheduling. Computational Intelligence 27, 103–122 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. González-Ferrer, A., ten Teije, A., Fdez-Olivares, J., Milian, K.: Automated generation of patient-tailored electronic care pathways by translating computer-interpretable guidelines into hierarchical task networks. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 57, 91–109 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kambhampati, S., Cutkosky, M., Tenenbaum, M., Lee, S.H.: Combining specialized reasoners and general purpose planners: A case study. In: Proceedings of the Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Durfee, E.H., Kenny, P.G., Kluge, K.C.: Integrated premission planning and execution for unmanned ground vehicles. Autonomous Robots 5(1), 97–110 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Conry, S.E., Kuwabara, K., Lesser, V.R., Meyer, R.A.: Multistage negotiation for distributed constraint satisfaction. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 21(6), 1462–1477 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Abidi, S.R.: A conceptual framework for ontology based automating and merging of clinical pathways of comorbidities. In: Riaño, D. (ed.) K4HelP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5626, pp. 55–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hing, M.M., Michalowski, M., Wilk, S., Michalowski, W., Farion, K.: Identifying inconsistencies in multiple clinical practice guidelines for a patient with co-morbidity. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW), pp. 447–452. IEEE (December 2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Milla-Millán, G., Fdez-Olivares, J., Sánchez-Garzón, I. (2013). A Common-Recipe and Conflict-Solving MAP Approach for Care Planning in Comorbid Patients. In: Bielza, C., et al. Advances in Artificial Intelligence. CAEPIA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8109. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40643-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40643-0_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40642-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40643-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics