Abstract
The knowledge for managing diseases is usually compiled in single-disease clinical guidelines (CG). These CGs are not directly reusable for managing comorbid patients, who suffer from more than one disease. This is because some interactions may exist between the different involved CGs. However, some common high-level activities can be found in the different CGs. In this work we present a Multi-Agent Planning (MAP) approach which encodes these common activities in a common recipe used by planning agents to firstly obtain local solutions and then applying a conflict solving procedure over them. An experimental evaluation has been carried out to test the validity of the approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boyd, C.M., Darer, J., Boult, C., Fried, L.P., Boult, L., Wu, A.W.: Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 294(6), 716–724 (2005)
GuideLine INteraction detection architecture, http://glindaproject.stanford.edu/
Peleg, M., Tu, S., Bury, J., Ciccarese, P., Fox, J., Greenes, R.A., Hall, R., Johnson, P.D., Jones, N., Kumar, A., et al.: Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10(1), 52–68 (2003)
Fdez-Olivares, J., Castillo, L., Cózar, J.A., García Pérez, O.: Supporting clinical processes and decisions by hierarchical planning and scheduling. Computational Intelligence 27, 103–122 (2011)
González-Ferrer, A., ten Teije, A., Fdez-Olivares, J., Milian, K.: Automated generation of patient-tailored electronic care pathways by translating computer-interpretable guidelines into hierarchical task networks. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 57, 91–109 (2012)
Kambhampati, S., Cutkosky, M., Tenenbaum, M., Lee, S.H.: Combining specialized reasoners and general purpose planners: A case study. In: Proceedings of the Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1991)
Durfee, E.H., Kenny, P.G., Kluge, K.C.: Integrated premission planning and execution for unmanned ground vehicles. Autonomous Robots 5(1), 97–110 (1998)
Conry, S.E., Kuwabara, K., Lesser, V.R., Meyer, R.A.: Multistage negotiation for distributed constraint satisfaction. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 21(6), 1462–1477 (1991)
Abidi, S.R.: A conceptual framework for ontology based automating and merging of clinical pathways of comorbidities. In: Riaño, D. (ed.) K4HelP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5626, pp. 55–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Hing, M.M., Michalowski, M., Wilk, S., Michalowski, W., Farion, K.: Identifying inconsistencies in multiple clinical practice guidelines for a patient with co-morbidity. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW), pp. 447–452. IEEE (December 2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Milla-Millán, G., Fdez-Olivares, J., Sánchez-Garzón, I. (2013). A Common-Recipe and Conflict-Solving MAP Approach for Care Planning in Comorbid Patients. In: Bielza, C., et al. Advances in Artificial Intelligence. CAEPIA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8109. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40643-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40643-0_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40642-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40643-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)