Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper assesses the scholarly impact of the CLEF evaluation campaign by performing a bibliometric analysis of the citations of the CLEF 2000–2009 proceedings publications collected through Scopus and Google Scholar. Our analysis indicates a significant impact of CLEF, particularly for its well-established Adhoc, ImageCLEF, and QA labs, and for the lab/task overview publications that attract considerable interest. Moreover, initial analysis indicates that the scholarly impact of ImageCLEF is comparable to that of TRECVid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bar-Ilan, J.: Which h-index? A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics 74(2), 257–271 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harzing, A.-W.: Citation analysis across disciplines: The impact of different data sources and citation metrics (2010), http://www.harzing.com/data_metrics_comparison.htm (retrieved)

  3. Hirsch, J.E.: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 102(46), 16569–16572 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacsó, P.: Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts. Online Information Review 30(3), 297–309 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahm, E., Thor, A.: Citation analysis of database publications. SIGMOD Record 34, 48–53 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seglen, P.O.: The skewness of science. JASIS 43(9), 628–638 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thornley, C.V., Johnson, A.C., Smeaton, A.F., Lee, H.: The scholarly impact of TRECVid (2003–2009). JASIST 62(4), 613–627 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsikrika, T., Seco de Herrera, A.G., Müller, H.: Assessing the scholarly impact of ImageCLEF. In: Forner, P., Gonzalo, J., Kekäläinen, J., Lalmas, M., de Rijke, M. (eds.) CLEF 2011. LNCS, vol. 6941, pp. 95–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Voorhees, E.M.: The philosophy of information retrieval evaluation. In: Peters, C., Braschler, M., Gonzalo, J., Kluck, M. (eds.) CLEF 2001. LNCS, vol. 2406, pp. 355–370. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tsikrika, T., Larsen, B., Müller, H., Endrullis, S., Rahm, E. (2013). The Scholarly Impact of CLEF (2000–2009). In: Forner, P., Müller, H., Paredes, R., Rosso, P., Stein, B. (eds) Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Visualization. CLEF 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8138. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40802-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40802-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40801-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40802-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics