Abstract
We address the existing gaps between business process models, enterprise architecture (EA) models and, external regulations that hinder completeness and lawfulness of business process models. As a solution we propose a high-level architecture for business process knowledge management that bridges the identified gaps. We use de-facto industry standards for modelling business processes and EA - BPMN and ArchiMate. We propose to use Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW) model as a theoretical foundation for storing business process knowledge represented in BPMN and ArchiMate models and storing elements that address lawfulness of the models. BWW model provides a framework for systematically storing internally maintained process knowledge (models) and externally maintained knowledge (regulations), and supporting completeness and lawfulness of the models. Thus, the main contributions of our approach is supporting completeness and lawfulness of business process models and supporting the creation of information services to increase efficiency in the business process modelling context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grant, R.M.: Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, 109–122 (1996)
Silver, B.: BPMN Method and Style with Implementer’s Guide. Cody-Cassidy Press (2011)
OMG: Business Process Model and Notation 2.0, http://www.bpmn.org
Businska, L., Kirikova, M., Penicina, L., Buksa, I., Rudzajs, P.: Enterprise Modeling for Respecting Regulations. PoEM Short Papers 2012. In: Emerging Topics in the Practice of Enterprise Modelling: The 5th IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modelling (PoEM 2012), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 106–118 (2012)
An Official Web Site of the United States Government, http://www.data.gov/
Akoma NTOSO: XML for Parliamentary, Legislative and Juridiciary Documents, http://www.akomantoso.org/
The Open Group: ArchiMate 2.0 Specification, http://goo.gl/7gC5B
Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. Information Systems Journal 3, 217–237 (1993)
Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Do Process Modelling Techniques Get Better? A Comparative Ontological Analysis of BPMN. In: Campbell, B., Underwood, J., Bunker, D. (eds.) 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2005)
Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Ontology II: A World of Systems, vol. 4 (1979)
Nelson, H.J., Poels, G., Genero, M., Piattini, M.: A conceptual modeling quality framework. Software Quality Journal 20, 201–228 (2011)
Rosemann, M., Recker, J., Indulska, M., Green, P.: A study of the evolution of the representational capabilities of process modeling grammars. In: Martinez, F.H., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4001, pp. 447–461. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Goumopoulos, C., Kameas, A.: Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications. Springer, Netherlands (2010)
zur Muehlen, M., Indulska, M., Kamp, G.: Business Process and Business Rule Modeling: A Representational Analysis. In: 2007 Eleventh International IEEE EDOC Conference Workshop, pp. 189–196. IEEE (2007)
Yan, Z., Dijkman, R., Grefen, P.: Business process model repositories – Framework and survey. Information and Software Technology 54, 380–395 (2012)
Rudzajs, P., Buksa, I.: Business Process and Regulations: Approach to Linkage and Change Management. In: Grabis, J., Kirikova, M. (eds.) BIR 2011. LNBIP, vol. 90, pp. 96–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Kirikova, M., Buksa, I., Penicina, L.: Raw Materials for Business Processes in Cloud. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Wrycza, S. (eds.) BPMDS 2012 and EMMSAD 2012. LNBIP, vol. 113, pp. 241–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Softwareag: ARIS ArchiMate Modeler, http://goo.gl/WI76E
Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A.: BPMN: An introduction to the standard. Computer Standards & Interfaces 34, 124–134 (2012)
The Open Group: TOGAF 9.1, https://www2.opengroup.org/ogsys/catalog/g116
Van Den Berg, M.: ArchiMate, BPMN and UML: An approach to harmonizing the notations. Orbus software white paper (2012)
Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org/
Creative Commons: CC API documentation: Version 1.0, http://goo.gl/I1FNC
SHERPA/RoMEO - Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving, http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/
SHERPA/RoMEO: XML schema for Publisher’s version/PDF, http://goo.gl/OypG6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Penicina, L., Kirikova, M. (2013). Towards Completeness and Lawfulness of Business Process Models. In: Kobyliński, A., Sobczak, A. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 158. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40823-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40823-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40822-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40823-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)