Skip to main content

Boolean Quantifier Elimination for Automotive Configuration – A Case Study

  • Conference paper
Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems (FMICS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8187))

Abstract

This paper evaluates different algorithms for existential Boolean quantifier elimination in the area of automotive configuration. We compare approaches based on model enumeration, on resolution, on dependency sequents, on substitution, and on knowledge compilation with projection. We describe two real-life applications: model counting on a set of customer-relevant options and projection of BOM (bill of materials) constraints. Our work includes an implementation of the presented techniques on top of state-of-the-art tools. We evaluate the different approaches on real production data from our collaboration with BMW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sabin, D., Weigel, R.: Product configuration frameworks-a survey. IEEE Intelligent Systems 13, 42–49 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Astesana, J.M., Bossu, Y., Cosserat, L., Fargier, H.: Constraint-based modeling and exploitation of a vehicle range at Renault’s: Requirement analysis and complexity study. In: Proceedings of the ConfWS 2010, pp. 33–39 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Küchlin, W., Sinz, C.: Proving consistency assertions for automotive product data management. Journal of Automated Reasoning 24, 145–163 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Seidl, A.M., Sturm, T.: Boolean quantification in a first-order context. In: Ganzha, V.G., Mayr, E.W., Vorozhtsov, E.V. (eds.) Proceedings of the CASC 2003, pp. 329–345. Institut für Informatik, TU München (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benedetti, M., Mangassarian, H.: QBF-based formal verification: Experience and perspectives. JSAT 5, 133–191 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Sturm, T., Zengler, C.: Parametric quantified SAT solving. In: Proceedings of the ISSAC 2010. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McMillan, K.L.: Symbolic Model Checking. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (1993)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. McMillan, K.L.: Applying SAT methods in unbounded symbolic model checking. In: Brinksma, E., Larsen, K.G. (eds.) CAV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2404, p. 250. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Narodytska, N., Walsh, T.: Constraint and variable ordering heuristics for compiling configuration problems. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2007, pp. 149–154. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Matthes, B., Zengler, C., Küchlin, W.: An improved constraint ordering heuristics for compiling configuration problems. In: Mayer, W., Albert, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the ConfWS, pp. 36–40 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Darwiche, A.: Decomposable negation normal form. Journal of the ACM 48, 608–647 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Grumberg, O., Schuster, A., Yadgar, A.: Memory efficient all-solutions SAT solver and its application for reachability analysis. In: Hu, A.J., Martin, A.K. (eds.) FMCAD 2004. LNCS, vol. 3312, pp. 275–289. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Gebser, M., Kaufmann, B., Schaub, T.: Solution enumeration for projected boolean search problems. In: van Hoeve, W.-J., Hooker, J.N. (eds.) CPAIOR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5547, pp. 71–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Brauer, J., King, A., Kriener, J.: Existential quantification as incremental sat. In: Gopalakrishnan, G., Qadeer, S. (eds.) CAV 2011. LNCS, vol. 6806, pp. 191–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis, M., Putnam, H.: A computing procedure for quantification theory. Journal of the ACM 7, 201–215 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Biere, A.: Resolve and expand. In: Hoos, H.H., Mitchell, D.G. (eds.) SAT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3542, pp. 59–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldberg, E., Manolios, P.: Quantifier elimination by dependency sequents. In: Proceedings of the FMCAD 2012, pp. 34–43. IEEE Computer Society (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kübler, A., Zengler, C., Küchlin, W.: Model counting in product configuration. In: Proceedings of the LoCoCo 2010. EPTCS, vol. 29, pp. 44–53 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ayari, A., Basin, D.: Qubos: Deciding quantified Boolean logic using propositional satisfiability solvers. In: Aagaard, M.D., O’Leary, J.W. (eds.) FMCAD 2002. LNCS, vol. 2517, pp. 187–201. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Darwiche, A.: New advances in compiling CNF to decomposable negational normal form. In: Proceedings of the ECAI 2004. IOS Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zengler, C., Kübler, A., Küchlin, W.: New approaches to boolean quantifier elimination. ACM Communications in Computer Algebra 45, 139–140 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Darwiche, A., Hopkins, M.: Using recursive decomposition to construct elimination orders, jointrees, and dtrees. In: Benferhat, S., Besnard, P. (eds.) ECSQARU 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2143, pp. 180–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Pipatsrisawat, K., Darwiche, A.: New compilation languages based on structured decomposability. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2008, pp. 517–522. AAAI Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zengler, C., Küchlin, W. (2013). Boolean Quantifier Elimination for Automotive Configuration – A Case Study. In: Pecheur, C., Dierkes, M. (eds) Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems. FMICS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8187. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41010-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41010-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41009-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41010-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics