Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of Technologies for Mapping Representation in Ontologies

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Conferences (OTM 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8185))

Abstract

Ontology mapping is needed to explicitly represent the relations between several ontologies, which is an essential task for applications such as semantic integration and data transformation. Currently, there is no standard for representing mappings. Instead, there are a number of technologies that support the representation of mappings between the ontologies. In this paper we introduce a set of mapping categories that were identified based on requirements for the data integration projects of an industry partner. An evaluation of available technologies for mapping representation regarding the support for introduced mapping categories has been performed. The results of the evaluation show that the SPARQL Inference Notation would fit the best in the described use case scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biffl, S., Moser, T., Winkler, D.: Risk assessment in multi-disciplinary (software+) engineering projects. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 21(02), 211–236 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brockmans, S., Haase, P., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Formalism-independent specification of ontology mappings – A metamodeling approach. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4275, pp. 901–908. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Ehrig, M.: Ontology alignment: bridging the semantic gap, vol. 4. Springer Science+ Business Media (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ghidini, C., Serafini, L., Tessaris, S.: On relating heterogeneous elements from different ontologies. In: Kokinov, B., Richardson, D.C., Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Vieu, L. (eds.) CONTEXT 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4635, pp. 234–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Haase, P., Motik, B.: A mapping system for the integration of owl-dl ontologies. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Interoperability of Heterogeneous Information Systems, pp. 9–16. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, S.S., Green, T.J., Loo, B.T.: Datalog and emerging applications: an interactive tutorial. In: Sellis, T.K., Miller, R.J., Kementsietsidis, A., Velegrakis, Y. (eds.) SIGMOD Conference, pp. 1213–1216. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Knublauch, H., Handler, J.A., Idehen, K.: SPIN - Overview and Motivation. W3C Member Submission, W3C (February 2011), http://www.w3.org/Submission/2011/SUBM-spin-overview-20110222/

  8. Maedche, A., Motik, B., Silva, N., Volz, R.: MAFRA – A MApping FRAmework for distributed ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 235–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Noy, N.F.: Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches. ACM Sigmod Record 33(4), 65–70 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scharffe, F., de Bruijn, J.: A language to specify mappings between ontologies. In: Proc. of the Internet Based Systems IEEE Conference (SITIS 2005). Citeseer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scharffe, F., Fensel, D.: Correspondence patterns for ontology alignment. In: Gangemi, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) EKAW 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5268, pp. 83–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ten challenges for ontology matching. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2008, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5332, pp. 1164–1182. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CDL-Flex, Vienna University of Technology, Favoritenstrasse 9-11/E188, A-1040, Vienna, Austria

    Olga Kovalenko, Estefanía Serral & Stefan Biffl

  2. Vrije Universiteit Brussel STARLab, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050, Brussel, Belgium

    Christophe Debruyne

Authors
  1. Olga Kovalenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christophe Debruyne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Estefanía Serral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefan Biffl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. STAR Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Bldg G/10, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Robert Meersman

  2. CRAN, University of Lorraine, Campus Sciences, BP 70239, 54506, Vandoevre-les-Nancy, France

    Hervé Panetto

  3. Computer Science and Computer Engineering, La Trobe University, 3086, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Tharam Dillon

  4. Dept. of Informatics Systems, University of Klagenfurt, Universitaetsstrasse 65, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Johann Eder

  5. LIRMM, University of Montpellier II, 161 Rue Ada, 34392, Montpellier Cedex 5, France

    Zohra Bellahsene

  6. Department of Informatics, University of Hamburg, 22527, Hamburg, Germany

    Norbert Ritter

  7. Department of Computer Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Pieter De Leenheer

  8. Computer and Information Science Department, University of Oregon, 97403, Eugene, OR, USA

    Deijing Dou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kovalenko, O., Debruyne, C., Serral, E., Biffl, S. (2013). Evaluation of Technologies for Mapping Representation in Ontologies. In: Meersman, R., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Conferences. OTM 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8185. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41030-7_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41030-7_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41029-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41030-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation