Skip to main content

High against Low Quantile Comparison for Biomarker and Classifier Evaluation

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2013 (IDEAL 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8206))

  • 4807 Accesses

Abstract

We propose a method to check whether a – usually high – quantile from a sample is smaller than another – usually low – quantile from another sample. It is only required that the two samples come from (independent) continuous, but not necessarily the same distributions. The proposed method is based on confidence intervals (CI) and can be used for the evaluation of classifiers for two class problems as an alternative to ROC analysis and in the context of biomarkers. The quantiles correspond to the acceptable false positive and false negative rates. We also introduce a visualisation that shows how the probabilities for the overlap of CIs we compute change when the chosen quantiles are varied. This can help to select a suitable combination of quantiles, i.e. the acceptable false positive and false negative rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. De Angelis, G., Rittenhouse, H., Mikolajczyk, S., Blair, S., Semjonow, A.: Twenty years of PSA: From prostate antigen to tumor marker. Reviews in Urology 9(3), 113–123 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Obuchowsky, N., Lieber, M., Wians Jr., F.: ROC curves in clinical chemistry: Uses, misuses and possible solutions. Clinical Chemistry 50, 1118–1125 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Søreide, K.: Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research. Clinical Pathology 62, 1–5 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Macskassy, S., Provost, F.: Confidence bands for ROC curves: Methods and an empirical study. In: Hernández-Orallo, J., Ferri, C., Lachiche, N., Flach, P. (eds.) ROC Analysis in Artificial Intelligence, 1st International Workshop, ROCAI 2004, pp. 61–70 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kosorok, M.: Two-sample quantile tests under general conditions. Biometrika 86(4), 909–921 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozturk, O., Balakrishnan, N.: Exact two-sample nonparametric test for quantile difference between two populations based on ranked set samples. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 61(1), 235–249 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolfe, D.: Ranked set sampling: an approach to more efficient data collection. Statistical Science 19(4), 636–643 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. David, H., Nagaraja, H.: Order statistics. John Wiley, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gibbons, J., Chakraborti, S.: Nonparametric statistical inference. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tschumitschew, K., Klawonn, F. (2013). High against Low Quantile Comparison for Biomarker and Classifier Evaluation. In: Yin, H., et al. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2013. IDEAL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8206. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41278-3_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41278-3_68

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41277-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41278-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics