Abstract
We propose a method to check whether a – usually high – quantile from a sample is smaller than another – usually low – quantile from another sample. It is only required that the two samples come from (independent) continuous, but not necessarily the same distributions. The proposed method is based on confidence intervals (CI) and can be used for the evaluation of classifiers for two class problems as an alternative to ROC analysis and in the context of biomarkers. The quantiles correspond to the acceptable false positive and false negative rates. We also introduce a visualisation that shows how the probabilities for the overlap of CIs we compute change when the chosen quantiles are varied. This can help to select a suitable combination of quantiles, i.e. the acceptable false positive and false negative rate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
De Angelis, G., Rittenhouse, H., Mikolajczyk, S., Blair, S., Semjonow, A.: Twenty years of PSA: From prostate antigen to tumor marker. Reviews in Urology 9(3), 113–123 (2007)
Obuchowsky, N., Lieber, M., Wians Jr., F.: ROC curves in clinical chemistry: Uses, misuses and possible solutions. Clinical Chemistry 50, 1118–1125 (2004)
Søreide, K.: Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research. Clinical Pathology 62, 1–5 (2009)
Macskassy, S., Provost, F.: Confidence bands for ROC curves: Methods and an empirical study. In: Hernández-Orallo, J., Ferri, C., Lachiche, N., Flach, P. (eds.) ROC Analysis in Artificial Intelligence, 1st International Workshop, ROCAI 2004, pp. 61–70 (2004)
Kosorok, M.: Two-sample quantile tests under general conditions. Biometrika 86(4), 909–921 (1999)
Ozturk, O., Balakrishnan, N.: Exact two-sample nonparametric test for quantile difference between two populations based on ranked set samples. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 61(1), 235–249 (2009)
Wolfe, D.: Ranked set sampling: an approach to more efficient data collection. Statistical Science 19(4), 636–643 (2004)
David, H., Nagaraja, H.: Order statistics. John Wiley, New York (2003)
Gibbons, J., Chakraborti, S.: Nonparametric statistical inference. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tschumitschew, K., Klawonn, F. (2013). High against Low Quantile Comparison for Biomarker and Classifier Evaluation. In: Yin, H., et al. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2013. IDEAL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8206. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41278-3_68
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41278-3_68
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41277-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41278-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)