Skip to main content

Discrediting Body. A Multimodal Strategy to Spoil the Other’s Image

  • Conference paper
Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action (PS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7688))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In political persuasion the persuader, beside bearing logical arguments and triggering emotions, must present one’s own image (one’s ethos) of a credible and reliable person, by enhancing three dimensions of it: competence, benevolence and dominance. In a parallel way, s/he may cast discredit on the opponent by criticizing, accusing or insulting on the same three dimensions. The work provides a description and a typology of multimodal discrediting moves focusing on the discrediter’s multimodal behavior. Based on an Italian corpus of political debates the analysis points out which facial expressions, gaze behavior, gestures, postures and prosodic features are used to convey discredit concerning the three target features of competence, benevolence and dominance. The qualitative study of discredit signals highlights the close relation with emotions and in this sense particular attention is given to them as triggers of the Audience’s evaluation

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pentland, A.: Honest Signals. How Do they Shape our World. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aristotle (360 b.c.). On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, 2nd edn. Oxford University, New York (2007), Kennedy, G.A (trans.)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Poggi, I.: The Goals of Persuasion. Pragmatics and Cognition 13(2), 297–336 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Vincze, L.: Discrediting Moves in Political Debates. In: Ricci, F., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of Second International Workshop on User Models for Motivational Systems: The Affective And the Rational Routes to Persuasion (UMMS 2011) (Girona). LNCS, pp. 84–99. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Woods, J., Walton, D.: Argument: The Logic of the Fallacies. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walton, D.: Types of Dialogue, Dialectical Shifts and Fallacies. In: van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Blair, J.A., Willard, C.A. (eds.) Argumentation Illuminated, pp. 133–147. SICSAT, Amsterdam (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walton, D.N.: Ad Hominem Arguments. In: Studies in Rhetoric and Communication. University of Alabama Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R.: Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hovland, C.I., Weiss, W.: The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness. Pub. Opinion Quart. 15, 635–650 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenberg, A., Hirschberg, J.: Charisma Perception from Text and Speech. Speech Communication 51, 640–655 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiner, B.: An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. Springer, New York (1986)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Seligman, C.R., Tucker, G.R., Lambert, W.E.: The effects of Speech Style and other Attributes on Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Pupils. Lang. in Soc. 1, 131–142 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D’Errico F., Poggi I., Vincze L.: Discrediting signals. A Model of Social Evaluation to Study Discrediting Moves in Political Debates. J.M.U.I. (2012), doi: 10.1007/s12193-012-0098-4

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peeters, G.: The Positive-Negative Asymmetry: On Cognitive Consistency and Positivity Bias. Europ. J. Soc. Psych. 1(4), 455–474 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Catellani, P.: Attacco e Difesa nella Comunicazione Massmediale. In: Catellani, P., Sensales, G. (eds.) Psicologia della Politica, pp. 97–112 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Entman, R.M.: Framing: Towards a Clarification of a Fractured Theory. J. Comm. 43(4), 51–58 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazzoleni, P.: La Comunicazione Politica. Il Mulino, Bologna (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., Glick, P., Xu, J.: A Model of (often mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. 82, 878–902 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ekvall, G.: The Organizational Culture of Idea-Management:  A Creative Climate for the Management of Ideas. In: Henry, J., Walker, D. (eds.) Managing Innovation, pp. 73–79. SAGE Publications Ltd., London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leach, C.W., Ellemers, N., Barreto, M.: Group Virtue: The Importance of Morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the Positive Evaluation of Ingroups. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. 93, 234–249 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Castelli, L., Carraro, L., Ghitti, C., Pastore, M.: The Effects of Perceived Competence and Sociability on Electoral Outcomes. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45, 1152–1155 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Catellani, P., Bertolotti, M.: Leadership Attacks versus Morality Attacks: Their Effects on the Evaluation of Politicians. Talk held at the XVI General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Stockholm, July 12-16 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Calbris, G.: L’Expression Gestuelle de la Pensée d’un Homme Politique. Éditions du CNRS, Paris (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kendon, A.: Gesture. Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Streeck, J.: Gesture in Political Communication. A Case Study of the Democratic Presidential Candidates during the 2004 Primary Campaign. In: Lang. and Soc. Interact. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quintilianus M.F.: Institutiones Oratoriae. The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian (The Loeb Classical Library). Putnam and Sons, New York, He, B. (trans.)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Burgoon, J.K., Birk, T., Pfau, M.: Nonverbal Behaviors, Persuasion, and Credibility. Human Communication Research 17, 140–169 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maricchiolo, F., Gnisci, A., Bonaiuto, M.: Political Leaders’ Communicative Style and Audience Evaluation in an Italian General Election Debate.This volume

    Google Scholar 

  29. Poggi, I., Pelachaud, C.: Persuasion and the Expressivity of Gestures in Humans and Machines. In: Wachsmuth, I., Lenzen, M., Knoblich, G. (eds.) Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines, pp. 391–424. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Poggi, I., Vincze, L.: Gesture, Gaze and Persuasive Strategies in Political Discourse. In: Kipp, M., Martin, J.-C., Paggio, P., Heylen, D. (eds.) Multimodal Corpora. LNCS, vol. 5509, pp. 73–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Ekman, P.: About brows: Emotional and Conversational Signals. In: von Cranach, M., Foppa, K., Lepenies, W., Ploog, D. (eds.) Human Ethology: Claims and Limits of a New Discipline: Contributions to the Colloquium, pp. 169–248. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Attardo, S., Eisterhold, J., Hay, J., Poggi, I.: Multimodal Markers of Irony and Sarcasm, Humor. Internat. J. Humor Research 16(2), 243–260 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Poggi, I., Cavicchio, F., Magno Caldognetto, E.: Irony in Judicial Debates: Analyzing the Subtleties of Irony while Testing the Subtleties of an Annotation Scheme. J. Lang. Resources and Eval. 4(3-4), 215–232 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Poggi, I.: Multimodality and political functions of irony and ridicule in a political trial. In: Vion, R., Giacomi, A., Vargas, C. (eds.) La Corporalité du Langage, pp. 41–54. Presses Universitaires de Provence, Aix-en- Provence-Marseille (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. University College, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Miceli, M., Castelfranchi, C.: The Role of Evaluation in Cognition and Social Interaction. In: Dautenhahn, K. (ed.) Human Cognition and Agent Technology. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Castelfranchi, C.: Che figura. Emozioni e Immagine Sociale. Il Mulino, Bologna (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Poggi, I.: Types of Emotions and Types of Goals. In: Proceedings of the Workshop AFFINE: Affective Interaction in Natural Environment, Post-Conference Workshop of ICMI, Chania, Crete, September 24 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Trust Theory. A Socio-Cognitive and Computational Model. John Wiley, Chichester (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Castelfranchi, C.: Micro-Macro Constitution of Power. ProtoSociology. Internat. J. Interdisciplinary Research 18-19, 208–265 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Poggi, I., D’Errico, F.: Dominance Signals in Debates. In: Salah, A.A., Gevers, T., Sebe, N., Vinciarelli, A. (eds.) HBU 2010. LNCS, vol. 6219, pp. 163–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Austin, J.L.: How to do Things with Words. Clarendon Press, London (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jonasson, J.: The Centenarian who Climbed out the Window and Disappeared. Carl’s Books (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. D’Errico, F., Poggi, I.: Blame the Opponent! Effects of Multimodal Discrediting Moves in Public Debates. Cognitive Computation 4(4), 460–476 (2012), doi:10.1007/s12559-012-9175-y, ISSN 1866-9956

    Google Scholar 

  45. D’Errico, F., Poggi, I., Vincze, L.: Discrediting Signals. A Model of Social Evaluation to Study Discrediting Moves in Political Debates. Special Issue in “Social Signal Processing”. JMUI 6(3-4), 163–178 (2012), doi:10.1007/s12193-012-0098-4

    Google Scholar 

  46. Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Vincze, L.: Ridiculization in Public Debates: Making Fun of the Other as a Discrediting Move. In: Calzolari, N., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), May 21-27, pp. 44–50. ELRA, Istanbul (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Vincze, L.: Comments in Words, Face and Body. JMUI 10 (2012), doi:1007/s12193-012-0102-z

    Google Scholar 

  48. Poggi, I.: Mind, Hands, Face and Body. A goal and belief view of multimodal communication. Weidler Buchverlag, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Du Bois, J.W.: The Stance Triangle. In: Englebretson, R. (ed.) Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Benjamins, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jaffe, A.: Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford University press, Oxford (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Leone, G.: Pedagogical Stances and their Multimodal signals. In: Chair, N.C.C., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), pp. 3233–3240. European Language Resources Association, Istanbul (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kendon, A.: Gestures as Illocutionary and Discourse Structure Markers in Southern Italian Conversation. J. Pragmatics 23, 247–279 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Weiner, B.: An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. Springer, New York (1986)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  54. Müller, C.: Forms and Uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A Case of a Gesture Family? In: Müller, C., Posner, E. (eds.) The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures. Weidler, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

D’Errico, F., Poggi, I., Vincze, L. (2013). Discrediting Body. A Multimodal Strategy to Spoil the Other’s Image. In: Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Vincze, L., Vinciarelli, A. (eds) Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action. PS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7688. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41545-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41545-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41544-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41545-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics