Skip to main content

Combining Recommender and Reputation Systems to Produce Better Online Advice

  • Conference paper
Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence (MDAI 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8234))

Abstract

Although recommender systems and reputation systems have quite different theoretical and technical bases, both types of systems have the purpose of providing advice for decision making in e-commerce and online service environments. The similarity in purpose makes it natural to integrate both types of systems in order to produce better online advice, but their difference in theory and implementation makes the integration challenging. In this paper, we propose to use mappings to subjective opinions from values produced by recommender systems as well as from scores produced by reputation systems, and to combine the resulting opinions within the framework of subjective logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 17(6), 734–749 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn, H.J.: A new similarity measure for collaborative filtering to alleviate the new user cold-starting problem. Information Sciences 178(1), 37–51 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burke, R., O’Mahony, M.P., Hurley, N.J.: Robust collaborative recommendation. In: Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 805–835 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gunes, I., et al.: Shilling attacks against recommender systems: a comprehensive survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1–33 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hankin, R.K.S.: A Generalization of the Dirichlet Distribution. Journal of Statistical Software 33(11), 1–18 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jøsang, A., Bhuiyan, T., Xu, Y., Cox, C.: Combining Trust and Reputation Management for Web-Based Services. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Trust, Privacy & Security in Digital Business (TrustBus 2008), Turin (September 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jøsang, A., Costa, P.C.G., Blash, E.: Determining Model Correctness for Situations of Belief Fusion. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION 2013), Istanbul (July 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jøsang, A., et al.: A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems 43(2), 618–644 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jøsang, A., Luo, X., Chen, X.: Continuous Ratings in Discrete Bayesian Reputation Systems. In: Karabulut, Y., Mitchell, J., Herrmann, P., Jensen, C.D. (eds.) Trust Management II. IFIP, vol. 263, pp. 151–166. Springer, Boston (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Jøsang, A., Golbeck, J.: Challenges for Robust of Trust and Reputation Systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Security and Trust Management (STM 2009), Saint Malo (September 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jøsang, A., Hankin, R.K.S.: Interpretation and Fusion of Hyper Opinions in Subjective Logic. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION 2012), Singapore (July 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koren, Y.: Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. Communications of the ACM 53(4), 89–97 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Massa, P., Avesani, P.: Trust-aware recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mui, L., Mohtashemi, M., Ang, C.: A probabilistic rating framework for pervasive computing environments. In: Proceedings of the MIT Student Oxygen Workshop, SOW 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shi, Y., Karatzoglou, A., Baltrunas, L., Larson, M., Hanjalic, A., Oliver, N.: Tfmap: Optimizing map for top-n context-aware recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2012), pp. 155–164 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walley, P.: Inferences from Multinomial Data: Learning about a Bag of Marbles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 58(1), 3–57 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Y., Singh, M.P.: Evidence-based trust: A mathematical model geared for multiagent systems. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS) 5(4), 14 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jøsang, A., Guo, G., Pini, M.S., Santini, F., Xu, Y. (2013). Combining Recommender and Reputation Systems to Produce Better Online Advice. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y., Navarro-Arribas, G., Megías, D. (eds) Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. MDAI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8234. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41550-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41550-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41549-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41550-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics