Skip to main content

Ontology Driven Contextual Best Fit in Embodied Construction Grammar

  • Conference paper
Constraint Solving and Language Processing (CSLP 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8114))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Constraint satisfaction has been central to the ICSI/UC Berkeley Neural Theory of Language (NTL) project, but this aspect has not previously been emphasized. The ECG Analysis program combines constraints from several aspects of the formalism: deep semantic schemas, embodied constructions and ontological knowledge. In this chapter we focus on some applications of deep semantic constraints that extend the Embodied Construction Grammar formalism (ECG) and Analyzer. The first example is a shallow reference resolution method that is based on the combination of the recency principle with syntactic and semantic compatibility between the anaphor and the referent. The method has been implemented and tested as part of a system capable of understanding Solitaire card-game instructions, with promising results. Similar deep ontology-driven constraint satisfaction techniques can be exploited to handle many cases of Noun-Noun compounds and metaphorical constructions. Implemented examples of these are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Prince, A., Smolensky, P.: Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Blackwell (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feldman, J.: From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. MIT Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kehler, A.: Coherence, reference and the theory of grammar. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bryant, J.: Best-Fit constructional analysis. Ph.D. thesis. UC Berkeley. Berkeley, CA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hobbs, J.: Pronoun resolution. Technical Report. CUNY (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hobbs, J.: Resolving pronoun references. Lingua 44, 311–338 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Asher, N., Lascarides, A.: Logics of conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lappin, S., Leass, H.: An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics 4, 535–561 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mitkov, R.: Robust pronoun resolution with limited knowledge. In: Proc. COLIN/ACL 1998, pp. 869–875 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Soon, W., Ng, H., Lim, D.: A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics 4, 521–544 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ponzetto, S., Strube, M.: Exploiting semantic role labeling, wordnet and wikipedia for coreference resolution. In: Proceedings of the HLT 2006, New York City, pp. 192–199 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ng, V., Cardie, C.: Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 104–111 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ng, V.: Semantic class induction and coreference resolution. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bryant, J., Gilardi, L.: A cognitive model of sentence interpretation. In: Boas, H.C. (ed.) Computational Approaches to Embodied Construction Grammar, John Benjamins, San Diego (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feldman, J., Dodge, E., Bryant, J.: Embodied construction grammar. In: Heine, B., Heiko, N. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, pp. 111–138. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Narayanan, S.: KARMA: Knowledge-based action representations for metaphor and aspect. Ph.D. thesis. UC Berkeley. Berkeley, CA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chang, N., Mok, E.: A structured context model for grammar learning. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Vancouver, BC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mok, E.: Contextual bootstrapping for grammar learning. Ph.D. thesis. UC Berkeley. Berkeley, CA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Poon, H., Domingos, P.: Joint unsupervised coreference resolution with markov logic. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 650–659 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oliva, J., Feldman, J., Gilardi, L., Dodge, E. (2013). Ontology Driven Contextual Best Fit in Embodied Construction Grammar. In: Duchier, D., Parmentier, Y. (eds) Constraint Solving and Language Processing. CSLP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8114. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41578-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41578-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41577-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41578-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics