Abstract
This paper presents a knowledge base (and foundational issues of its operation) for a support system designed for divorcing parents and intending to decide on issues of exercise of parental authority and contacts with children. The legal and functional context of this system is also presented. However, the main focus is on ideas concerning representation of a very complex legal concept, i.e. well-being of the child.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lynch, C., Ashley, K.D., Pinkwart, N., Aleven, V.: Concepts, structures and goals: Redefining ill-definedness. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 19, 253–266 (2009)
Grabmair, M., Ashley, K.D.: Argumentation with value judgments – An example of hypothetical reasoning. In: Winkels, R. (ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems JURIX 2010: The 23rd Annual Conference, pp. 67–76. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2010)
Grabmair, M., Ashley, K.D.: Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts. In: Ashley, K., van Engers, T. (eds.) Proceedings of ICAIL 2011, pp. 161–170. ACM Press, New York (2011)
Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Modeling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6, 231–287 (1998)
Ehrgott, M.: Multicriteria optimization. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Sartor, G.: Doing justice to rights and values: Teleological reasoning and proportionality. Artificial Intelligence and Law 18, 175–215 (2010)
Ashley, K.D.: Modeling legal argument: Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)
Aleven, V.: Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh Graduate Program in Intelligent Systems (1997)
Hage, J.C.: Studies in legal logic. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Prakken, H.: A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation. In: Winkels, R. (ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems JURIX 2010: The 23rd Annual Conference, pp. 27–36. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2010)
Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Prakken, H., Visser, W.: Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. In: Ashley, K., van Engers, T. (eds.) Proceedings of ICAIL 2011, pp. 21–30. ACM Press, New York (2011)
Lodder, A., Zeleznikow, J.: Developing an online dispute resolution environment: Dialogue tools and negotiation support systems in a three-step model. Harvard Negotiation Law Review 10, 287–337 (2005)
Zeleznikow, J., Stranieri, A., Gawler, M.: Project report: Split-Up: A legal expert system which determines property division after divorce. Artificial Intelligence and Law 3, 267–275 (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Araszkiewicz, M., Łopatkiewicz, A., Zienkiewicz, A. (2013). Parent Plan Support System – Context, Functions and Knowledge Base. In: Abramowicz, W. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 160. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41687-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41687-3_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41686-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41687-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)