Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TCCI,volume 8065))

Abstract

A novel formalization of beliefs in multiagent systems has recently been proposed by Dunin-Kęplicz and Szałas. The aim has been to bridge the gap between idealized logical approaches to modeling beliefs and their actual implementations. Therefore the stages of belief acquisition, intermediate reasoning and final belief formation have been isolated and analyzed. In conclusion, a novel semantics reflecting those stages has been provided. This semantics is based on the new concept of epistemic profile, reflecting agent’s reasoning capabilities in a dynamic and unpredictable environment. The presented approach appears suitable for building complex belief structures in the context of incomplete and/or inconsistent information. One of original ideas is that of epistemic profiles serving as a tool for transforming preliminary beliefs into final ones. As epistemic profile can be devised both on an  individual and a  group level in analogical manner, a uniform treatment of single agent and group beliefs has been achieved.

In the current paper these concepts are further elaborated. Importantly, we indicate an implementation framework ensuring tractability of reasoning about beliefs, propose the underlying methodology and illustrate it on an example.

Supported by the Polish National Science Centre grants 2011/01/B/ST6/02769 and 6505/B/T02/2011/40.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ågotnes, T., Alechina, N.: Full and relative awareness: A decidable logic for reasoning about knowledge of unawareness. In: Proc. of TARK, pp. 6–14. ACM Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alferes, J.J., Pereira, L.M.: Reasoning with Logic Programming. LNCS, vol. 1111. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Belnap, N.D.: A useful four-valued logic. In: Epstein, G., Dunn, J.M. (eds.) Modern Uses of Many Valued Logic, pp. 8–37. Reidel (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Béziau, J.-Y., Carnielli, W., Gabbay, D.M. (eds.): Handbook of Paraconsistency. College Publications (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brewka, G.: Non-Monotonic Reasoning: Logical Foundations of Commonsense. Cambridge University Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Amo, S., Pais, M.S.: A paraconsistent logic approach for querying inconsistent databases. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 46, 366–386 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois, D.: On ignorance and contradiction considered as truth-values. Logic Journal of the IGPL 16(2), 195–216 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Nguyen, L.A., Szałas, A.: Tractable approximate knowledge fusion using the Horn fragment of serial propositional dynamic logic. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 51(3), 346–362 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Szałas, A.: Epistemic Profiles and Belief Structures. In: Jezic, G., Kusek, M., Nguyen, N.-T., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES-AMSTA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7327, pp. 360–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Szałas, A.: Paraconsistent Distributed Belief Fusion. In: Proc. IDC 2012, 6th International Symposium on Intelligent Distributed Computing. SCI, vol. 446, pp. 59–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: Teamwork in Multi-Agent Systems. A Formal Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: Awareness as a vital ingredient of teamwork. In: Stone, P., Weiss, G. (eds.) Proc. of AAMAS 2006, pp. 1017–1024 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fages, F.: Consistency of Clark’s completion and existence of stable models. Methods of Logic in Computer Science 1, 51–60 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.: Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 34(1), 39–76 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning About Knowledge. The MIT Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gottlob, G.: Complexity results for nonmonotonic logics. Journal of Logic and Computation 2(3), 397–425 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hintikka, J.: Knowledge and Belief. Cornell University Press (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kraus, S., Lehmann, D.: Knowledge, belief and time. Theoretical Computer Science 58, 155–174 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Laux, A., Wansing, H. (eds.): Knowledge and Belief in Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence. Akademie Verlag, Berlin (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Łukaszewicz, W.: Non-Monotonic Reasoning - Formalization of Commonsense Reasoning. Ellis Horwood (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Małuszyński, J., Szałas, A.: Living with inconsistency and taming nonmonotonicity. In: de Moor, O., Gottlob, G., Furche, T., Sellers, A. (eds.) Datalog 2010. LNCS, vol. 6702, pp. 384–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Małuszyński, J., Szałas, A.: Logical foundations and complexity of 4QL, a query language with unrestricted negation. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 21(2), 211–232 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Małuszyński, J., Szałas, A.: Partiality and Inconsistency in Agents Belief Bases. In: Agents and Multi-agent Systems – Technologies and Applications. IOS Press (to appear, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marek, V.W., Truszczyński, M.: Nonmonotonic Logic. Springer (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mares, E.D.: A paraconsistent theory of belief revision. Erkenntnis 56, 229–246 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Mascardi, V., Demergasso, D., Ancona, D.: Languages for programming BDI-style agents: an overview. In: Corradini, F., De Paoli, F., Merelli, E., Omicini, A. (eds.) WOA 2005 - Workshop From Objects to Agents, pp. 9–15 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nguyen, L.A.: Foundations of modal deductive databases. Fundamenta Informaticae 79(1-2), 85–135 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Nguyen, L.A.: Constructing finite least Kripke models for positive logic programs in serial regular grammar logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL 16(2), 175–193 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Priest, G.: Paraconsistent belief revision. Theoria 67(3), 214–228 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Rantala, V.: Impossible worlds semantics and logical omniscience. Acta Philosophica Fennica 35, 106–115 (1982)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Sobczyk, Ł.: 4QL Runner developer description (2012), http://4ql.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/4qlRunner.pdf

  33. Spanily, P.: The Inter4QL interpreter (2012), http://4ql.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/inter4ql.pdf

  34. Stalnaker, R.: On logics of knowledge and belief. Philosophical Studies 128, 169–199 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Szałas, A.: How an agent might think. Logic Journal of the IGPL 21(3), 515–535 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. van Ditmarsch, H.P., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.P.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vitória, A., Małuszyński, J., Szałas, A.: Modeling and reasoning with paraconsistent rough sets. Fundamenta Informaticae 97(4), 405–438 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Wansing, H.: A general possible worlds framework for reasoning about knowledge and belief. Studia Logica 49, 523–539 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Szałas, A. (2013). Taming Complex Beliefs. In: Nguyen, N.T. (eds) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8065. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41776-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41776-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41775-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41776-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics