Skip to main content

Understanding Team Dynamics with Agent-Based Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transforming Field and Service Operations

Abstract

Agent-based simulation is increasingly used in industry to model systems of interest allowing the evaluation of alternative scenarios. By this means, business managers can estimate the consequences of policy changes at low cost before implementing them in the business. However, in order to apply such models with confidence, it is necessary to validate them continuously against changing business patterns. Typically, models contain key parameters which significantly affect the overall behaviour of the system. The process of selecting such parameters is an inverse problem known as ‘tuning’ In this chapter, we describe the application of computational intelligence to tune the parameters of a workforce dynamics simulator. We show that the best algorithm achieves reduced tuning times as well as more accurate field workforce simulations. Since implementation, this algorithm has facilitated the use of simulation to assess the effect of changes in different business scenarios and transformation initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This time was measured on an Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 520 @ 2.40 GHZ, 1.86 GB of RAM.

References

  • Baluja S (1994) Population-based incremental learning: a method for integrating genetic search based function optimization and competitive learning. DTIC, Fort Belvoir

    Google Scholar 

  • Baluja S (1995) An empirical comparison of seven iterative and evolutionary function optimization heuristics. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein Y, Shah N, Tsang EPK, Dorne R, Alsheddy A, Voudouris C (2010) On the partitioning of dynamic workforce scheduling problems. J Schedul 13:411–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis T (1996) The handbook of genetic algorithms. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez C, Lozano JA, Larrañaga P (2002) Mathematical modelling of UMDAc algorithm with tournament selection. Behaviour on linear and quadratic functions. Int J Approx Reason 31:313–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larrañaga P, Lozano JA (eds) (2002) Estimation of distribution algorithms: a new tool for evolutionary computation. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Liret A, Dorne R (2009) Work allocation and scheduling. In: Voudouris C, Owusu G, Dorne R, Lesaint D (eds) Service chain management: technology innovation for the service business. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Liret A, Shepherdson J, Borenstein Y, Voudouris C, Tsang E (2009) Workforce dynamics simulator in service operations scheduling systems. In: Conference on enterprise information systems

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S, Hibon M (2000) The m3-competition: results, conclusions and implications. Int J Forecast 16(4):451–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M (1997) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenbein H, Paaß G (1996) From recombination of genes to the estimation of distributions I. Binary parameters. In: Parallel problem solving from nature PPSN IV. pp 178–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Otten RHJM, van Ginneken LPPP (1989) The annealing algorithm. Kluwer, Boston, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovski A, Shakya S, McCall J (2006) Optimising cancer chemotherapy using an estimation of distribution algorithm and genetic algorithms. In: Genetic and evolutionary computation conference GECCO. pp 413–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers JL, Nicewander WA (1988) Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. Am Statistic 42(1):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah N, Tsang EPK, Borenstein Y, Dorne R, Liret A, Voudouris C (2009) Intelligent agent based workforce empowerment. In: KES-AMSTA’09. pp 163–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakya S (2006) DEUM: a framework for an estimation of distribution algorithm based on Markov random fields. The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakya S, McCall J (2007) Optimization by estimation of distribution with DEUM framework based on Markov random fields. Int J Automat Comput 4:262–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakya S, Brownlee A, McCall J, Fournier F, Owusu G (2010) DEUM: a fully multivariate EDA based on Markov networks. In: Chen Y (ed) Exploitation of linkage learning in evolutionary algorithms. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B, Gallagher M (2009) Convergence analysis of UMDAC with finite populations: a case study on flat landscapes. In: Genetic and evolutionary computation conference GECCO. pp 477–482

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John McCall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mamer, T., McCall, J., Shakya, S., Owusu, G., Regnier-Coudert, O. (2013). Understanding Team Dynamics with Agent-Based Simulation. In: Owusu, G., O’Brien, P., McCall, J., Doherty, N. (eds) Transforming Field and Service Operations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44970-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics