Skip to main content

Computing Plurality Points and Condorcet Points in Euclidean Space

  • Conference paper
Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8283))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This work concerns two kinds of spatial equilibria. Given a multiset of n points in Euclidean space equipped with the ℓ2-norm, we call a location a plurality point if it is closer to at least as many given points as any other location. A location is called a Condorcet point if there exists no other location which is closer to an absolute majority of the given points. In d-dimensional Euclidean space ℝd, we show that the plurality points and the Condorcet points are equivalent. When the given points are not collinear, the Condorcet point (which is also the plurality point) is unique in ℝd if such a point exists. To the best of our knowledge, no efficient algorithm has been proposed for finding the point if the dimension is higher than one. In this paper, we present an O(n d − 1 logn)-time algorithm for any fixed dimension d ≥ 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Afshani, P.: On approximate range counting and depth. Discrete and Computational Geometry 42(1), 3–21 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandelt, H.-J.: Networks with Condorcet solutions. European Journal of Operational Research 20(3), 314–326 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan, T.M.: An optimal randomized algorithm for maximum Tukey depth. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 430–436 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chepoi, V., Dragan, F.: Condorcet and median points of simple rectilinear polygons. Location Science 4(1-2), 21–35 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., Rivest, R.L., Stein, C.: Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd edn. MIT Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, O.A., Hinich, M.J., Ordeshook, P.C.: An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process. The American Political Science Review 64(2), 426–448 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Durier, R.: Continuous location theory under majority rule. Mathematics of Operations Research 14(2), 258–274 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen, P., Labbé, M.: Algorithms for voting and competitive location on a network. Transportation Science 22(4), 278–288 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen, P., Thisse, J.-F.: Outcomes of voting and planning: Condorcet, Weber and Rawls locations. Journal of Public Economics 16(1), 1–15 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen, P., Thisse, J.-F., Wendell, R.E.: Equivalence of solutions to network location problems. Mathematics of Operations Research 11(4), 672–678 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuhn, H.W.: On a pair of dual nonlinear programs. In: Abadie, J. (ed.) Nonlinear Programming, pp. 37–54. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Labbé, M.: Outcomes of voting and planning in single facility location problems. European Journal of Operational Research 20(3), 299–313 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. McKelvey, R.D., Wendell, R.E.: Voting equilibria in multidimensional choice spaces. Mathematics of Operations Research 1(2), 144–158 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Megiddo, N.: Linear programming in linear time when the dimension is fixed. Journal of the ACM 31(1), 114–127 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Rousseeuw, P.J., Struyf, A.: Computing location depth and regression depth in higher dimensions. Statistics and Computing 8(3), 193–203 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tukey, J.: Mathematics and the picturing of data. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, vol. 2, pp. 523–531 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vohra, R.V.: Distance weighted voting and a single facility location problem. European Journal of Operational Research 41(3), 314–320 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Wendell, R.E., McKelvey, R.D.: New perspectives in competitive location theory. European Journal of Operational Research 6(2), 174–182 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wendell, R.E., Thorson, S.J.: Some generalizations of social decisions under majority rule. Econometrica 42(5), 893–912 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, YW., Lin, WY., Wang, HL., Chao, KM. (2013). Computing Plurality Points and Condorcet Points in Euclidean Space. In: Cai, L., Cheng, SW., Lam, TW. (eds) Algorithms and Computation. ISAAC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8283. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45030-3_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45030-3_64

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45029-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45030-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics