Skip to main content

On Labelling Intent Types for Evaluating Search Result Diversification

  • Conference paper
Information Retrieval Technology (AIRS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8281))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Search result diversification is important for accommodating different user needs by means of covering popular and diverse query intents within a single result page. To evaluate diversity, we believe that it is important to consider the distinction between informational and navigational intents, as users would not want redundant information especially for navigational intents. In this study, we conduct intent type-sensitive diversity evaluation based on both top-down labelling, which labels each intent as either navigational or informational a priori, and bottom-up labelling, which labels each intent based on whether a “navigational relevant” document has actually been identified in the document collection. Our results suggest that reliable type-sensitive diversity evaluation can be conducted using the top-down approach with a clear intent labelling guideline, while ensuring that the desired URLs for navigational intents make their way into relevance assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Sreenivas, G., Halverson, A., Leong, S.: Diversifying search results. In: Proceedings of ACM WSDM 2009, pp. 5–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broder, A.: A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum 36(2) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chapelle, O., Ji, S., Liao, C., Velipasaoglu, E., Lai, L., Wu, S.-L.: Intent-based diversification of web search results: Metrics and algorithms. Information Retrieval 14(6), 572–592 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, F., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., Ma, S., Chen, L.: A subtopic taxonomy-aware framework for diversity evaluation. In: Proceedings of EVIA 2013, pp. 9–16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, C.L., Craswell, N., Soboroff, I.: Overview of the TREC 2009 web track. In: Proceedings of TREC 2009 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke, C.L., Craswell, N., Soboroff, I., Ashkan, A.: A comparative analysis of cascade measures for novelty and diversity. In: Proceedings of ACM WSDM 2011, pp. 75–84 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, C.L., Craswell, N., Soboroff, I., Cormack, G.V.: Overview of the TREC 2010 web track. In: Proceedings of TREC 2010 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke, C.L., Craswell, N., Soboroff, I., Voorhees, E.: Overview of the TREC 2011 web track. In: Proceedings of TREC 2011 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jansen, B.J., Booth, D.L., Spink, A.: Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of web queries. Information Processing and Management 44, 1251–1266 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rafiei, D., Bharat, K., Shukla, A.: Diversifying web search results. In: Proceedings of WWW 2010, pp. 781–790 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rose, D.E., Levinson, D.: Understanding user goals in web search. In: Proceedings of WWW 2004, pp. 13–19 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sakai, T.: Evaluating evaluation metrics based on the bootstrap. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2006, pp. 525–532 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sakai, T.: Evaluation with informational and navigational intents. In: Proceedings of WWW 2012, pp. 499–508 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sakai, T., Dou, Z., Yamamoto, T., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., Song, R., Kato, M.P., Iwata, M.: Overview of the NTCIR-10 INTENT-2 task. In: Proceedings of NTCIR-10, pp. 94–123. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sakai, T., Song, R.: Evaluating diversified search results using per-intent graded relevance. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2011, pp. 1043–1052 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sakai, T., Song, R.: Diversified search evaluation: Lessons from the NTCIR-9 INTENT task. Information Retrieval 16(4), 504–529 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Song, R., Zhang, M., Sakai, T., Kato, M.P., Liu, Y., Sugimoto, M., Wang, Q., Orii, N.: Overview of the NTCIR-9 INTENT task. In: Proceedings of NTCIR-9, pp. 82–105 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yilmaz, E., Aslam, J., Robertson, S.: A new rank correlation coefficient for information retrieval. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2008, pp. 587–594 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sakai, T., Song, YI. (2013). On Labelling Intent Types for Evaluating Search Result Diversification. In: Banchs, R.E., Silvestri, F., Liu, TY., Zhang, M., Gao, S., Lang, J. (eds) Information Retrieval Technology. AIRS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8281. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45068-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45068-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45067-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45068-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics