Skip to main content

Auctions with Rational Adversary

  • Conference paper
Information Systems Security (ICISS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 8303))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Security of various types of online auctions has received a considerable attention from researchers. However, very few works have analyzed the problem of security in online sealed-bid auctions from the point of view of rational participants. The paper deals with an online auction scenario where two types of participants co-exist: 1) a party corrupted by a rational adversary that have positive utilities from information gained and that has no valuation for the items on auction enabling them to bid arbitrarily and 2) rational parties that are privacy conscious, positively value information gain and have a valuation for items on auction. The secure auction protocol proposed here addresses 1) privacy concerns of the rational players from themselves as well as the rational adversary; 2) prevention of ‘throwing away’ of contracts by rational adversaries and 3) prevention of sellers from obtaining their copy of the contract while winners do not receive theirs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bogetoft, P., Damgård, I.B., Jakobsen, T., Nielsen, K., Pagter, J.I., Toft, T.: A practical implementation of secure auctions based on multiparty integer computation. In: Di Crescenzo, G., Rubin, A. (eds.) FC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4107, pp. 142–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bradford, P.G., Park, S., Rothkopf, M.H., Park, H.: Protocol completion incen-tive problems in cryptographic Vickrey auctions. Electronic Commerce Research 8(1-2), 57–77 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Franklin, M.K., Reiter, M.K.: The design and implementation of a secure auction service. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 22(5), 302–312 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fuchsbauer, G., Katz, J., Naccache, D.: Efficient rational secret sharing in standard communication networks. In: Micciancio, D. (ed.) TCC 2010. LNCS, vol. 5978, pp. 419–436. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon, S.D., Katz, J.: Rational Secret Sharing, Revisited. In: De Prisco, R., Yung, M. (eds.) SCN 2006. LNCS, vol. 4116, pp. 229–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Groce, A., Katz, J., Thiruvengadam, A., Zikas, V.: Byzantine agreement with a rational adversary. In: Czumaj, A., Mehlhorn, K., Pitts, A., Wattenhofer, R. (eds.) ICALP 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7392, pp. 561–572. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Halpern, J., Teague, V.: Rational secret sharing and multiparty computation: extended abstract. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2004, pp. 623–632. ACM, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Juels, A., Szydlo, M.: A two-server, sealed-bid auction protocol. In: Blaze, M. (ed.) FC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2357, pp. 72–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kol, G., Naor, M.: Games for exchanging information. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2008, pp. 423–432. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miltersen, P.B., Nielsen, J.B., Triandopoulos, N.: Privacy-enhancing auctions using rational cryptography. In: Halevi, S. (ed.) CRYPTO 2009. LNCS, vol. 5677, pp. 541–558. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Naor, M., Pinkas, B., Sumner, R.: Privacy preserving auctions and mechanism design. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 129–139. ACM (November 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Parkes, D.C., Rabin, M.O., Thorpe, C.: Cryptographic combinatorial clock-proxy auctions. In: Dingledine, R., Golle, P. (eds.) FC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5628, pp. 305–324. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki, K., Yokoo, M.: Secure generalized Vickrey auction using homomorphic encryption. In: Wright, R.N. (ed.) FC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2742, pp. 239–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

De, S.J., Pal, A.K. (2013). Auctions with Rational Adversary. In: Bagchi, A., Ray, I. (eds) Information Systems Security. ICISS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8303. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45204-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45204-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45203-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45204-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics