Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8001))

  • 601 Accesses

Abstract

Product discussion boards are a rich source of information about consumer sentiment about products, which is being increasingly exploited. Most sentiment analysis has looked at single products in isolation, but users often compare different products, stating which they like better and why. We present a set of techniques for analyzing how consumers view product markets. Specifically, we extracted relative sentiment analysis and comparisons between products, to understand what attributes users compare products on, and which products they prefer on each dimension. We illustrate these methods in an extended case study analyzing the sedan car markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Popescu, A.-M., Etzioni, O.: Extracting Product Features and Opinions from Reviews. In: Proceedings of HLT-EMNLP, pp. 339–346 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dave, K., Lawrence, S., Pennock, D.M.: Mining the Peanut Gallery: Opinion Extraction and Semantic Classification of Product Reviews. In: Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference WWW 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, S.-M., Hovy, E.: Identifying and Analyzing Judgment Opinions. In: Proceedings of HLT/NAACL-2006, New York City, NY, pp. 200–2007 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Turney, P.D.: Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews. In: Proceedings of ACL 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 168–177 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S.: Thumbs up? Sentiment Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques. In: Proceedings of EMNLP-02, 7th Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, US, pp. 79–86 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miller, D., Schwartz, R., Weischedel, R., Stone, R.: Named Entity Extraction from Broadcast News. In: Proceedings of DARPA Broadcast News Workshop, Herndon, VA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feldman, R., Rosenfeld, B., Fresko, M.: TEG – A Hybrid Approach to Information Extraction. Knowledge and Information Systems 9(1), 1–18 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McCallum, A., Li, W.: Early Results for Named Entity Recognition with Conditional Random Fields, Feature Induction and Web-Enhanced Lexicons. In: Proceedings of CoNLL-2003, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 188–191 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman, R., Kloesgen, W., Zilberstein, A.: Visualization Techniques to Explore Data Mining Results for Document Collections. In: Proceedings of KDD 1997 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman, R., Fresko, M., Goldenberg, J., Netzer, O., Ungar, L.: Extracting Product Comparisons from Discussion Boards. In: Proceedings of ICDM 2007, Omaha, NE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yeh, A., Hirschman, L., Morgan, A., Colosimo, M.: BioCreative task 1a: Gene Mention Finding evaluation. In: BMC Bioinformatics, p. 6 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sang, E.F.T.K., Buchholz, S.: Introduction to the CoNLL-2000 Shared Task: Chunking. In: Proceedings of 4th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 127–132 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Etzioni, O., Cafarella, M., Downey, D., Popescu, A.-M., Shaked, T., Soderland, S., Weld, D.S., Yates, A.: Unsupervised Named-Entity Extraction from the Web: An Experimental Study. Artificial Intelligence 165(1), 91–134 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenfeld, B., Feldman, R.: Using Corpus Statistics on Entities to Improve Semi-supervised Relation Extraction from the Web. In: Proceeding of ACL 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: Determining the Semantic Orientation of Terms through Gloss Classification. In: Proceedings of CIKM 2005, Bremen, DE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chklovski, T.: Deriving Quantitative Overviews of Free Text Assessments on the Web. In: Proceedings of 2006 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2006), Sydney, Australia (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gregory, M., Chinchor, N., Whitney, P., Carter, R., Turner, A., Hetzler, E.: User-Directed Sentiment Analysis: Visualizing the Affective Content of Documents. In: Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text Workshop at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics ACL 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Mining comparative sentences and relations. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lattin, J.M., Green, P.E., Carroll, J.D.: Analyzing Multivariate Data. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Identifying Comparative Sentences in Text Documents. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 244–251 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Information Extraction: Distilling Structured Data from Unstructured Text. Andrew McCallum. ACM Queue 3(9) (November 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schwartz, B.: The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feldman, R., Fresko, M., Goldenberg, J., Netzer, O., Ungar, L. (2014). Analyzing Product Comparisons on Discussion Boards. In: Dershowitz, N., Nissan, E. (eds) Language, Culture, Computation. Computing - Theory and Technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8001. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45321-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45321-2_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45320-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45321-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics