Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8002))

  • 1203 Accesses

Abstract

Technological developments tend to move at a very different speed from their cultural assimilation. Hence it is not surprising that impressive technical wizardry should be used in culturally unimpressive ways. The real problem is one of imaginative maturity. Here I argue that Choueka’s old question, “The tools are here; where are the results?”, similarly directs humanist scholars to pay attention first to development of theory rather than to the features of software. For those who know where to look, the results we do have are hardly unimpressive, but to argue their importance requires a new understanding of both theory and practice. The problem scholars face is twofold: first to develop a computational discourse adequate to the best artefactual theories we have; second to reconceive their computational practices as a matter of tooling rather than tool-use. For computer science the biggest challenge is to understand and implement dynamical scholarly practices as they metamorphose from one temporary state to the next.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. de Sola Pool, I. (ed.): The Social Impact of the Telephone. MIT Bicentennial Series. MIT Press, Cambridge (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Briggs, A.: The Pleasure Telephone: A Chapter in the Prehistory of the Media. In: [1: 40-65]

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becher, T., Trowler, P.: Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, 2nd edn. Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press, Buckingham (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burke, P.: A Social History of Knowledge from Gutenberg to Diderot. Vonhoff Lectures, University of Groningen. Polity Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baird, D.: Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. University of California Press, Berkeley (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hacking, I.: Our Neo-Cartesian Bodies in Parts. Critical Inquiry 34, 78–105 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Norton, B.: Building Demand Models to Improve Environmental Policy Process. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCarty, W.: Humanities Computing. Palsgrave, Basingstoke (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hacking, I.: Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Bush, V.: As We May Think. Atlantic Monthly 126.1 (1945): 641-9. Rpt. In: [12: 85-110]

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bush, V.: Memex Revisited. In: Science is Not Enough. In: [12: 197-216]. William Morrow, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nyce, J., Kahn, P. (eds.): From Memex to Hypertext: Vannevar Bush and the Mind’s Machine. Academic Press, Boston (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Geertz, C.: Religion as a Cultural System. In: Interpretation of Cultures, pp. 87–125. Fontana, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daston, L.: Are you having fun today? Rev. of: Merton, R., Barber, E. The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science. London Review of Books 26(18) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhn, T.: The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science. In: The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, pp. 178–224. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boden, M.: The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, 2nd edn. Routledge, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gooding, D.: Experiment. In: A Companion to the Philosophy of Science. In: Newton-Smith, W.H. (ed.) Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Blackwell, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McCarty, W.: Being reborn: the humanities, computing and styles of scientific reasoning. In: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies (2008) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  19. McCarty, W.: An Analytical Onomasticon to the Metamorphoses of Ovid (2004) (December 9, 2007), http://www.mccarty.org.uk/analyticalonomasticon/

  20. Creager, A., Lunbeck, E., Wise, M. (eds.): Science without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives. Duke University Press, Durham NC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hockey, S.: Electronic Texts in the Humanities. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Renear, A., McGann, J.: What is text? A debate on the philosophical and epistemological nature of text in the light of humanities computing research. In: Association for Computers and the Humanities, Charlottesville VA (1994) (26 December 2007), www.iath.virginia.edu/ach-allc.99/proceedings/hockey-renear2.html (October 31, 2013)

  23. Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., Unsworth, J. (eds.): A Companion to Digital Humanities. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. McGann, J.: Marking Texts of Many Dimensions. In: [23: 198-217]

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sinclair, J.: Corpus, concordance, collocation. Describing English Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sinclair, S.: Computer-Assisted Reading. Literary and Linguistic Computing 18(2), 175–184 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Flanders, J.: Digital Texts, and the Problem of Pedantry. Text Technology 14(2) (2005) (December 26, 2007) texttechnology.mcmaster.ca/pdf/vol14_2/flanders14-2.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bradley, J.: Thinking Differently about Thinking: Pliny and Scholarship in the Humanities. Paper Delivered at Digital Humanities 2007, Urbana-Champaign IL, June 6 (December 9, 2007), www.digitalhumanities.org/dh2007/abstracts/xhtml.xq?id=124

  29. Burrows, J.: Textual Analysis. In: [23: 323-47]

    Google Scholar 

  30. Burrows, J.: All the Way Through: Testing for Authorship in Different Frequency Strata. Literary and Linguistic Computing 22(1), 27–47 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Burrows, J.: Never Say Always Again: Reflections on the Numbers Game. In: McCarty, W. (ed.) Text and Genre in Reconstruction: Effects of Digitalization on Ideas, Behaviours, Products and Institutions, p. 13-35. Open Book Publishers, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  32. Masterman, M.: The Intellect’s New Eye. Times Literary Supplement 284 (April 27, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ellis, A., Favat, F.: From Computer to Criticism: An Application of Automatic Content Analysis to the Study of Literature. In: Stone, P., Dunphy, D., Smith, M., Ogilvie, D. (eds.) The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge (1966); Ellis, A., Favat, F.: From Computer to Criticism: An Application of Automatic Content Analysis to the Study of Literature. In: Jennings, E. (ed.) Science and Literature: New Lenses for Criticism, pp. 125–137. Anchor Books, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Simon, H., Newell, A.: Heuristic Problem Solving: The Next Advance in Operations Research. Operations Research 6(1), 1–10 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bellman, R.: On “Heuristic Problem Solving” by Simon and Newell. Operations Research 6(3), 448–449 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Simon, H., Newell, A.: Reply: Heuristic Problem Solving. Operations Research 6(3), 449–450 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dreyfus, H.: Alchemy and Artificial Intelligence. Rand Corporation Papers, P-3244. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dreyfus, H.: From Micro-Worlds to Knowledge Representation: AI at an Impasse. In: Brachman, R., Levesque, H. (eds.) Readings in Knowledge Representation. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Los Angeles (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Newell, A.: Metaphors for Mind, Theories of Mind: Should the Humanities Mind? In: Sheehan, J., Sosna, M. (eds.) The Boundaries of Humanity: Humans, Animals, Machines, pp. 158–197. University of California Press, Berkeley (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Winograd, T.: Thinking Machines: Can There Be? Are We? In: Sheehan, J., Sosna, M. (eds.) The Boundaries of Humanity: Humans, Animals, Machines, pp. 198–223. University of California Press, Berkeley (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wittig, S.: The Computer and the Concept of Text. Computers and the Humanities 11, 211–215 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sperberg-McQueen, C.M.: Text Analysis Software Planning Meeting, Princeton, 17-19, Trip Report (2/12/07) (May 1996), http://cmsmcq.com/1996/ceth9605.html

  43. Frischer, Bernie, et al.: Report on Summit Accomplishments. In: Summit on Digital Tools for the Humanities. Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, Charlottesville (2006), www.iath.virginia.edu/dtsummit/

  44. Hoover, D.: End of the Irrelevant Text: Electronic Texts, Linguistics, and Literary Theory. Digital Humanities Quarterly 1(2) (December 7, 2007), www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/001/2/000012.html

  45. Forster, L.: Literary Studies as Flight from Literature? Modern Language Review 73, xxi-xxiv (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rosen, R.: Essays on Life Itself. Complexity in Ecological Systems Series. Columbia University Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  47. McCarty, W.: Beyond the word: Modelling literary context. Unpublished essay of 2007, http://bit.ly/19UyrN4 (October 31, 2013)

  48. McGann, J.: Texts in N-Dimensions and Interpetation in a New Key [Discourse and Interpretation in N-Dimensions]. Text Technology 2, 1–18 (2003), texttechnology.mcmaster.ca/pdf/vol12_2_02.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  49. Computing and the Humanities: Summary of a Roundtable Meeting. 1998. Occasional Paper No. 41. American Council of Learned Societies, New York (1998) (December 9, 2007), http://www.acls.org/op41-toc.htm

  50. Unsworth, J.: Scholarly Primitives: what methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this? Humanities Computing: Formal Methods, Experimental Practice, King’s College London (May 13, 2000) (December 9, 2007), www3.isrl.uiuc.edu/~unsworth/Kings.5-00/primitives.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCarty, W. (2014). Special Effects; or, The Tooling Is Here. Where Are the Results?. In: Dershowitz, N., Nissan, E. (eds) Language, Culture, Computation. Computing of the Humanities, Law, and Narratives. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8002. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45324-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45324-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45323-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45324-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics