Skip to main content

Deciding between Conflicting Influences

  • Conference paper
Engineering Multi-Agent Systems (EMAS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8245))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper investigates an approach of decision making internally in an agent where a decision is based on preference and expectation. The approach uses a logic for qualitative decision theory proposed by Boutilier to express such notions. To make readily use of this we describe a simple method for generating preference and expectation models that respect certain rules provided by the agents, and we briefly discuss how to integrate the approach into an existing agent programming language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alechina, N., Dastani, M., Logan, B.: Programming Norm-Aware Agents. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2012, vol. 2, pp. 1057–1064. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alechina, N., Jago, M., Logan, B.: Resource-bounded belief revision and contraction. In: Baldoni, M., Endriss, U., Omicini, A., Torroni, P. (eds.) DALT 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3904, pp. 141–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Boutilier, C.: Toward a Logic for Qualitative Decision Theory. In: Proceedings of the KR 1994, pp. 75–86. Morgan Kaufmann (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., Huang, Z., Torre, L.v.d.: The BOID Architecture – Conflicts Between Beliefs, Obligations, Intentions and Desires. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 9–16. ACM Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dastani, M., Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: Role-assignment in open agent societies. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2003, pp. 489–496. ACM, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dignum, F., Morley, D., Sonenberg, E.A., Cavedon, L.: Towards Socially Sophisticated BDI Agents. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS 2000), pp. 111–118. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dignum, F., Kinny, D., Sonenberg, L.: From Desires, Obligations and Norms to Goals. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hindriks, K.V.: Programming Rational Agents in GOAL. Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Tools and Applications 2, 119–157 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Torre, L., Tan, Y.H.: Contrary-to-duty reasoning with preference-based dyadic obligations. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 27(1-4), 49–78 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jensen, A.S. (2013). Deciding between Conflicting Influences. In: Cossentino, M., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Winikoff, M. (eds) Engineering Multi-Agent Systems. EMAS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8245. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45343-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45343-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45342-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45343-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics