Abstract
We consider the distributed construction of a deterministic local broadcasting schedule in the SINR model of interference. During the execution of such a schedule each node should be able to transmit one message to its neighbors. Our construction requires only \(\mathcal {O}(\varDelta \log n)\) time slots, where \(\varDelta \) is the maximum node degree in the network and \(n\) the number of nodes. We prove that the length of the constructed schedule is asymptotically optimal, i.e. of length \(\mathcal {O}(\varDelta )\). Considering the simulation of \(\mathcal {CONGEST}\) algorithms in the SINR model, our deterministic schedule achieves a runtime of \(\mathcal {O}(\tau \varDelta ^2 + \varDelta \log n)\) time slots, where \(\tau \) is the original runtime in the \(\mathcal {CONGEST}\) model. We show that there is a lower bound of \(\varOmega (\varDelta ^2)\) for the simulation of each one of the \(\tau \) rounds, hence our simulation is optimal apart from the logarithmic factor. If we restrict the knowledge of the nodes and let the maximum node degree \(\varDelta \) be unknown, we can prove that at least \(\varOmega (\mathrm{D }+ \tau \varDelta ^2)\) time slots are required to simulate synchronized \(\mathcal {CONGEST}\) algorithms in the SINR model of interference, where \(\mathrm{D }\) is the diameter of the network. For our algorithms we assume location information to be given. Regarding the case without location information we argue that a deterministic algorithm to compute local broadcasting schedules by Derbel and Talbi [ICDCS’10], which requires transmission power adaption, needs messages of size \(\mathcal {O}(\log n)\) to simulate \(\mathcal {CONGEST}\) algorithms. This is a logarithmic factor less than stated by the authors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As only one transmission can be received in a time slot, \(\varDelta \) nodes in a transmission region require \(\varOmega (\varDelta )\) time slots to transmit to one (shared) neighbor.
- 2.
The higher \(\alpha \) is, the faster the signal fades. Usual values are \(\alpha \in [2,6]\).
References
Peleg, D.: Distributed Computing: A Locality-Sensitive Approach. Society for Industrial Mathematics, Philadelphia (2000)
Goussevskaia, O., Moscibroda, T., Wattenhofer, R.: Local broadcasting in the physical interference model. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Joint Workshop on Foundations of Mobile Computing (DialM-POMC’08), pp. 35–44. ACM (2008)
Derbel, B., Talbi, E.G.: Distributed node coloring in the SINR model. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’10), pp. 708–717. IEEE Computer Society (2010)
Jurdzinski, T., Kowalski, D.R.: Distributed backbone structure for algorithms in the SINR model of wireless networks. In: Aguilera, M.K. (ed.) DISC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7611, pp. 106–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Moscibroda, T., Wattenhofer, R.: The complexity of connectivity in wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM’06), pp. 1–13. IEEE Computer Society Press, April 2006
Avin, C., Lotker, Z., Pasquale, F., Pignolet, Y.-A.: A note on uniform power connectivity in the SINR model. In: Dolev, S. (ed.) ALGOSENSORS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5804, pp. 116–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Moscibroda, T., Wattenhofer, R., Zollinger, A.: Topology control meets SINR: the scheduling complexity of arbitrary topologies. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MOBIHOC’06), pp. 310–321. ACM (2006)
Yu, D., Wang, Y., Hua, Q.-S., Lau, F.C.M.: Distributed (\(\Delta \) + 1)-coloring in the physical model. In: Erlebach, T., Nikoletseas, S., Orponen, P. (eds.) ALGOSENSORS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7111, pp. 145–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Scheideler, C., Richa, A.W., Santi, P.: An O(log n) dominating set protocol for wireless ad-hoc networks under the physical interference model. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MOBIHOC’08), pp. 91–100 (2008)
Holzer, S., Wattenhofer, R.: Optimal distributed all pairs shortest paths and applications. In: Proceedings of the 31th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC’12), pp. 355–364. ACM (2012)
Derbel, B., Mosbah, M., Zemmari, A.: Fast distributed graph partition and application (extended abstract). In: 20th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2006), April 2006
Alon, N., Bar-Noy, A., Linial, N., Peleg, D.: On the complexity of radio communication. In: Proceedings of the 21th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC’89), pp. 274–285. ACM (1989)
Kuhn, F., Lynch, N., Newport, C.: The abstract MAC layer. Distrib. Comput. 24(3–4), 187–206 (2011)
Yu, D., Wang, Y., Hua, Q.S., Lau, F.C.M.: Distributed local broadcasting algorithms in the physical interference model. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS’11), pp. 1–8. IEEE Computer Society (2011)
Yu, D., Hua, Q.S., Wang, Y., Lau, F.C.M.: An O(log n) distributed approximation algorithm for local broadcasting in unstructured wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS’12), pp. 132–139. IEEE Computer Society (2012)
Halldórsson, M.M., Mitra, P.: Towards tight bounds for local broadcasting. In: The Eighth ACM International Workshop on Foundations of Mobile Computing (FOMC’12). ACM, July 2012
Moscibroda, T., Wattenhofer, M.: Coloring unstructured radio networks. Distrib. Comput. 21(4), 271–284 (2008)
Frischknecht, S., Holzer, S., Wattenhofer, R.: Networks cannot compute their diameter in sublinear time. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA’12, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 1150–1162. SIAM (2012). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2095116.2095207
Knuth, D.E.: Fundamental Algorithms. The Art of Computer Programming, vol. 1. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2011)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Research Training Group GRK 1194 “Self-organizing Sensor-Actuator Networks".
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fuchs, F., Wagner, D. (2014). On Local Broadcasting Schedules and CONGEST Algorithms in the SINR Model. In: Flocchini, P., Gao, J., Kranakis, E., Meyer auf der Heide, F. (eds) Algorithms for Sensor Systems. ALGOSENSORS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8243. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45346-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45346-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45345-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45346-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)