Skip to main content

Integrated use of causal and algebraic physiological models to support anaesthetists in decision making

  • Conference paper
AIME 91

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics ((LNMED,volume 44))

  • 82 Accesses

Abstract

This article presents an architecture to support anaesthetists in decision making. During an operation, it is the task of the anaesthetist to create and maintain such physiological conditions that surgery can take place. To this end, physiological variables of the patient are measured. The anaesthetist interprets the measurements in combination with other observations about the patient (e.g. skin colour) to draw conclusions about the patients physiological condition. If necessary, action is taken to change the physiological condition. Physiological knowledge plays an important role in both the interpretation of observations and the choice of actions taken by the anaesthetist. A computer system that supports these tasks should therefore have physiological knowledge at its disposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aa, J.J. van der, (1990), “Intelligent alarms in anesthesia”, thesis, University of Eindhoven: The Netherlands, ISBN 90–9003303–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akyürek, A., (1988), “Computing with MEDES data model in LORE: a collection of basic functions and medical queries”, internal report UHG/MIDS/K88–044, University Hospital Groningen: The Netherlands, pp. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ballast, A., (1987), “A computerized warning system for monitoring in anesthesia”, Int. J. Clin. Monitoring and Computing 4, pp. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borning, A., Duisberg, R., Freeman-Benson, B.,Cramer, A., and Woolf, M., (1987), “Constraint hierarchies”, proceedings of OOPSLA’87 (Object Oriented Programming Systems and LAnguages), pp. 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van Denneheuvel, S., and Van Emde Boas, P., (1988), “Constraint solving for databases”, proceedings of NAIC (The Dutch AI conference), pp. 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van Denneheuvel, S., and Van Emde Boas, P., (1990), “The rule language RL/1”, in: Tjoa, A. M., and Wagner, R. (eds.), Database and Expert System Applications, Proc. of the International Conference, Vienna, Austria, Springer Verlag Wien, pp. 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Denneheuvel, S., Van Emde Boas, P., Geus, F. de, and Rotterdam, E., (1990), “RL, a Language for Constraint Solving, Logic Programming and Database Processing”, proceedings of CSN90 (Computing Science in the Netherlands), pp: 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hentenryk, P. van, (1989), “Constraint satisfaction in logic programming”, The MIT-press, London, pp. 224.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leler, W, (1988), “Constraint programming languages; their specification and generation”, Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vries Robbé, P.F. de, (1978), “Medische besluitvorming; een aanzet tot formele geneeskunde” thesis, University of Groningen: The Netherlands (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vries Robbé, P.F. de, Zanstra, Hartkamp, S.F., and P.E., Beckers, W.P.A., (1989), “Medes as a tool for different reasoning strategies”, in: Hunter, J., Cookson, J., and Wyatt, J. (eds.), proceedings of AIME89, Springer Verlag Berlin, pp. 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rotterdam E.P., (1990), “Constraint solving”, Dept. of Medical Information Science, internal report R90021, Groningen: The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mackworth, A.K., (1987), “Constraint Satisfaction”, in: “Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence”, Shapiro, S.C., ed., John Wiley abd sons, pp. 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meseguer, P., (1989), “Constraint satisfaction problems: an overview”, AI communications, volume 2, number 1, pp. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weiss, S.M., Kulikowski, C.A., and Amard, S., (1978), “A model-based method for computer aided medical decision making”, Artificial Intelligence 11, pp. 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Woerlee, M.B., (1988), “Common perioperative problems and the anaesthetist”, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rotterdam, E.P., de Vries Robbé, P.F., Zock, J.P. (1991). Integrated use of causal and algebraic physiological models to support anaesthetists in decision making. In: Stefanelli, M., Hasman, A., Fieschi, M., Talmon, J. (eds) AIME 91. Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics, vol 44. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48650-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48650-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54144-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-48650-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics