Skip to main content

PECS: A Reference Model for the Simulation of Multi-Agent Systems

  • Conference paper
Tools and Techniques for Social Science Simulation

Abstract

There is currently a multitude of design approaches all concerned with building simulation models for multi-agent systems. The majority of the designs, however, focus on the requirements of specific application domains. We suggest that it would be desirable to develop a modelling methodology which can act as a generic platform from which to construct simulation models for multi-agent systems. In order to promote standardisation of modelling methodology, this paper presents a first-cut reference model whose feasibility will subsequently be demonstrated by a number of applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agah, A. & Bekey, G. A. (1996): Robot Colony Simulator: A Research Tool For Studying Colonies of Intelligent Robots. In: Simulation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agre, P. E. & Chapman, D. (1987): Pengi: An Implementation of a Theory of Activity. In: Proceedings of AAAI-87. Morgan-Kaufmann, 268–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossel, H. (1992): Modellbildung und Simulation. Vieweg, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldas, J. C. & Coelho, H. (1994): Strategic Interactions in Oligopolistic Markets — Experimenting with Real and Artificial Agents. In: Castelfranchi, C. & Werner, E. (eds.): Artificial Social Systems: Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (830). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, J., et al. (1994): The EOS Project: Modelling Upper Palaeolithic Social Change. In: Gilbert, N. & Doran, J. (eds.): Simulating Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drogoul, A. & Ferber, J. (1994): Multi-Agent Simulation as a Tool For Modeling Societies: Application to Social Differentiation in Ant Colonies. In: Castelfranchi, C. & Werner, E. (eds.): Artificial Social Systems: Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (830), Springer; Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flache, A. & Hegselmann R. (1997): Rational vs. Adaptive Egoism In Support Networks: How Different Micro Foundations Shape Different Macro Hypothesis. In: Leinfellner, W. & Köhler, E. (eds.): Game Theory, Experience, Rationality. Foundations of Social Sciences, Economics and Ethics. Yearbook of the Institute Vienna Circle 5/97, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebeier, D. (1994): The Swarm Simulation System and Individual-based Modeling. In: Proceedings of Decision Support 2001: Advanced Technology for Natural Resource Management, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhns, M. N. (1994): Foreword. In: Singh, M. P. (ed.): Multiagent Systems. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 799. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P. (1991): The agent network architecture (ANA). SIGART Bulletin 2(4), 115–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P. (1995): Artificial Life Meets Entertainment: Life Like Autonomous Agents. In: Communications of the ACM 38, 11, 108–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffat, D. & Frijda, N. H. (1994): Where there’s a Will there’s an Agent. In: Intelligent Agents. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. (1995): SIMPLEX II — Ein integriertes Simulationssystem — Benutzerhandbuch. SCS, Erlangen, Ghent, Istanbul, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. (1996): Referenzmodelle. In: SiP — Simulation in Passau, Heft 2, 5-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, A. (1996): What sort of architecture is required for a human-like agent? Invited talk at Cognitive Modeling Workshop. AAAI96, Portland Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundermeyer, K. (1993): Modellierung von Agentensystemen. In: Müller, J. (Hrsg.): Verteilte künstliche Intelligenz. BI Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. & Toussaint, A. (1996): Referenzmodell SSA für Strategien. In: SiP — Simulation in Passau, Heft 3,8-15

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. P. (1997): Emotional Agents. A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Science of the University of Birmingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunsch, G. (1986): Handbuch der Systemtheorie. Oldenbourg Verlag, München, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G. (1988): Psychologie. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Urban, C. (2000). PECS: A Reference Model for the Simulation of Multi-Agent Systems. In: Suleiman, R., Troitzsch, K.G., Gilbert, N. (eds) Tools and Techniques for Social Science Simulation. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51744-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51744-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1265-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51744-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics