Skip to main content

Automatic Scoring of English Writing Based on Joint of Lexical and Phrasal Features

  • Conference paper
Information Computing and Applications (ICICA 2013)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 391))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In order to determine the effect of phrasal features in automated essay scoring (AES) of English writing by Chinese college students, a multiple linear regression model is adopted involving lexical features and phrasal features. A corpus of college English writing containing 660 compositions was used as training and testing texts. The experimental results show that with phrasal features, all indexes including precision, recall, total accuracy and total wrong ratio of the AES model are improved. Especially obvious is the total accuracy, which improves from 38.64% to 43.18%. Though the regression model cannot be applied into practical use yet, it lays a solid foundation for further research in AES field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sinclair, J.: Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Partington, A.: Patterns and meanings: Using corpora for English language research and teaching. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Nattinger, J., DeCarrico, J.: Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Corder, S.P.: Introducing Applied Linguistics. Penguin, London (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, L., Zhang, Y.: A Corpus-based Study on Chunks in English Argumentative Writing of Chinese EFL Learners. Computer-Assisted Foreign Language Education (4), 36–41 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Diao, L.: A Survey of Chinese English Majors’ Chunk Competence. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages (4), 35–38 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ding, Y., Qi, Y.: Use of Formulaic Language as a Predictor of L2 Oral and Written Performance. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages (3), 49–53 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, F., Ying, Y.: The Comparison of Phrases in High and Low Proficiency Level Students’ English Writing. Journal of Shaoxing University 27, 107–109 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leacock, C., Chodorow, M., Gamon, M., Tetreault, J.: Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hasan, T.M., Wu, X.: An Adaptive Algorithm for Improving the Fractal Image Compression (FIC). Journal of Multimedia 6, 477–485 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, Q., Wang, P., Yang, H.: Applications of Text Clustering Based on Semantic Body for Chinese Spam Filtering. Journal of Computers 7, 2612–2616 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guan, X., Chen, J.: College English Writing. Jilin University Press, Jilin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Toutanova, K.: The Stanford NLP Group Part-of-Speech Tagger (2009), http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tagger.shtml

  14. de Haan, P.: Tagging non-native English with the TOSCA-ICLE tagger. In: Mair, C., Hundt, M. (eds.) Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Freiburg im Breisgau, pp. 69–79 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liang, M.: The Research and Development of Automated Essay Scoring System for Large Scale English Test. Higher Education Press, Beijing (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Laufer, B., Nation, P.: Vocabulary Size and Use: Lexical Richness in L2 Written Production. Applied Linguistics 3, 307–322 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Y., Ge, S.: The Validity of Word List in Automated Essay Scoring for College Students. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching (10), 48–52 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Enright, M.K., Quinlan, T.: Complementing human judgment of essays written by English langauge learners with e-rater® scoring. Language Testing 27, 317–334 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beliakov, G., Yearwood, J., Kelarev, A.: Application of Rank Correlation, Clustering and Classification in Information Security. Journal of Networks 7, 935–945 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, H., Zhao, K., Liu, H., Yu, F.: Improved MFCC Feature Extraction Combining Symmetric ICA Algorithm for Robust Speech Recognition. Journal of Multimedia 7, 74–81 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ge, S. (2013). Automatic Scoring of English Writing Based on Joint of Lexical and Phrasal Features. In: Yang, Y., Ma, M., Liu, B. (eds) Information Computing and Applications. ICICA 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 391. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53932-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53932-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53931-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53932-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics