Skip to main content

Group Decision Making Versus Expert Opinion in the Multi-Objective Analysis of Ecosystem Management

  • Conference paper
Operations Research Proceedings 2002

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings 2002 ((ORP,volume 2002))

  • 431 Accesses

Abstract

Ecological issues with demands for preserving the nature and multipurpose use of land have, along with existing economic criteria, become a key part of the modem concept of ecosystem management. Therefore, on one hand, the land owners and experts are faced with the land use decisions which maximize the profit and refer to ecological objectives, while on the other hand, the public, who benefits from the amenity value of the ecosystem, specifically derives its own scenario of decisions. As such, an ecosystem management problem is a satisfactory attainment of multiple, but conflicting, objectives (Zadnik 200 I, 2002).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiher R, (1994) Multivariate Analysemethoden. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ballestero E, Romero C (1998) Multiple criteria decision making and its applications to economicproblems. Kluwer, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Golden B, Wasil E, Harkey P (1989) Analytichierarchyprocess. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. MacMillan Pub. Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Lin MJ (1987) Group decisionmakingunder multiple criteria. Springer,Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norusis MJ (1997) SPSSfor Windows: AdvancedStatistics,Ver. 10. SPSS Inc., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS (1991) Measures of personality and social psychologicalattitudes. AcademicPress, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer RE (1986) Multiplecriteria optimization. John Wiley,New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taha HA(1997) Operationsresearch. Prentice Hall,New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Tecle A, Duckstein L, Korhonen P (1994) Interactive, multiobjective programming. Applied mathematicsand computation 63: 75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston WL(1994) Operations research. DuxburyPress, Bellmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadnik Stirn L (2001) Compromiseprogramming for solving economic and environmental problems. In: Oblak L (eds) Ways for improving woodworking industry for transitional economies. Biotechnical Faculty, Ljubljana, pp 157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadnik Stirn L (2002) Evaluation of projects regarding the preferences of several decision makers (in Slovene). In: Grad J (eds) Proceedings DSI-SOR, Ljubljana, pp 366–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny M(1982) Multicriteriadecisionmaking. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stirn, L.Z. (2003). Group Decision Making Versus Expert Opinion in the Multi-Objective Analysis of Ecosystem Management. In: Leopold-Wildburger, U., Rendl, F., Wäscher, G. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2002. Operations Research Proceedings 2002, vol 2002. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55537-4_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55537-4_50

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00387-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55537-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics