Skip to main content

Project Risk Management by a Probabilistic Expert System

  • Conference paper
Operations Research Proceedings 2002

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings 2002 ((ORP,volume 2002))

Abstract

Efficient applications of expert systems to project risk management problems are seldom, if not unusual. In this paper we overcome this lack by using the probabilistic expert system shell SPIRIT. The rule-based shell ’s power in conditioning, inference and reasoning under incomplete information will work well on risk estimation and classification. A key characteristic of SPIRIT is the possibility to integrate project objectives into the risk management model. So known dependencies between risk variables can be modelled by the user if known beforehand, whereas hidden dependencies might be detected by the proper system. Because of the novelty of projects they suffer from incomplete information and it is this incompleteness which SPIRIT handles at high information fidelity. Furthermore undirected inference is possible, due to the undirected graphical structure in which knowledge is acquired and processed. So, in an early-state risk management situation - where the final model in terms of certain variables and/or their respective dependencies is not yet available - preliminary risk analyses and even recommendations for adequate risk treatment measures are possible, too. A middle size product developement example, including 12 binary variables and 34 rules, shows the inferential power of SPIRIT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breese, J.S., Hcckennann, D. (1996): Decision-theoretic Troubleshooting: A Framework for Repair and Experiment, in: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 12, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco, California, p. 124–132.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kulmann, F. (2002): Wissen und Information in konditionalen Modellen, Deutscher Universitats-Verlag, Wiesbaden, p. 56–58.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Madauss, B.-J. (1984): Projektmanagement, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer, C.-H. (1998): Korrektes Schliellen bei unvollstandiger Information, Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lauritzen, S.L., Thiesson, B., Spiegelhalter, DJ. (1994): Diagnostic systems by model selection: a case study, Lecture Notes in Statistics, 89, Springer, p. 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Raftery, J. (1994): Risk analysis in project management, E.&F.N. Spon, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Reucher, E., Radder, W.(2001): Modellierung von Entscheidungsproblemen unter Verwendung von probabilistischen Konditionalen, in Fleischmann, B. et AI.: Operations Research Proceedings 2000, Springer, p. 254–259.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Radder, W. (2000): Conditional Logic and the Principle of Entropy, Artificial Intelligence, 117, p. 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Radder, W. (2001): Knowledge Processing under Information Fidelity, Proc. UCAI 2001 - Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, Washington, p. 749–754.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Radder W., Ahuja, A. (forthcoming): Projektmanagement: Konzept, Aufgaben Techniken, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schon, D., Diederichs, M., Busch, V. (2001): Chancen-und Risikomanagement im Projektgeschaft, in: Controlling (2001) 7, p. 379–387.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schnorrenberg, U., Goebels G. (1997): Risikomanagement in Projekten, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Internet: http://www.xspirit.de

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ahuja, A., Rödder, W. (2003). Project Risk Management by a Probabilistic Expert System. In: Leopold-Wildburger, U., Rendl, F., Wäscher, G. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2002. Operations Research Proceedings 2002, vol 2002. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55537-4_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55537-4_53

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00387-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55537-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics