Skip to main content

Blind Signal Separation from Optical Imaging Data

  • Conference paper
Mustererkennung 2000

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

  • 279 Accesses

Abstract

Optical imaging is the video recording of two-dimensional patterns of changes in light reflectance from cortical tissue evoked by Stimulation. We derived a method, called extended spatial decorrelation (ESD), that uses second order statistics in space for separating the intrinsic signals into the stimulus related components and the nonspecific variations. The Performance of ESD on model data is compared to independent component analysis (ICA) algorithms using statistics of 4th and higher order. Robustness against sensor noise is scored. When applied to optical images, ESD separates the stimulus specific signal well from biological noise and artifacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ts’o, D.Y., Frostig, R.D., Lieke, E.E. &Grinvald, A. Science 249, 417–420 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blasdel, G.G. & Salama, G. Notare 321, 579–585 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stetter, M. et al. Soc. Neuroscl Abstr. 23, 455 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Oja, E. Neurocomputing 17, 25–45 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell, A.J. & Sejnowski, T. J. Neural Comput. 7, 1129–1159 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amari, S. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, (Mozer, M.C., Jordan, M.I. & Petsche, T., eds), volume 9, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hyvärinen, A. & Oja, E. Neural Comput. 9, 1483–1492 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Molgedey, LA. & Schuster, H.G.Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3634–3637 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schießl, I. et al. in Proceedings ofthe 1. ICA99 Workshop, Aussois, (Cardoso, J.-F., Jutten, C. & Loubaton, P., eds), volume 1, 179-184, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koehler, B.-U. & Orglmeister, R. in Proceedings ofthe ICA99 Workshop, (Cardoso, J.-F., Jutten, C. & Loubaton, P., eds), volume 1, 359-363, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stetter, M. & Obermayer, K. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, in press (1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schießl, I., Stetter, M., Mayhew, J.E.W., McLoughlin, N., Lund, J.S., Obermayer, K. (2000). Blind Signal Separation from Optical Imaging Data. In: Sommer, G., Krüger, N., Perwass, C. (eds) Mustererkennung 2000. Informatik aktuell. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59802-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59802-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67886-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59802-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics