Abstract
It is hoped that the average citizen, being the subject of a re-organization in a socio-technical system, will never have to absorb the Markovian and mathematically sound aspects of the paper. One of the more obvious reasons for this is that the paper describes a technical system which is the nice and tight shoe fitting perfectly on the supposed social system, i.e. the foot. And, when something does fit why bother with alterations. For instance, the author did not concern himself with the hardware needed to implement his soft system. How for instance, does the speed of data transmission effect the total data flow? Is Baud Rate or multiplexing important? How about incompatible source and absorbing hardware?, More important, can a social system deal with the loss of data? If so, how can this lost data be recuperated? These questions are undoubtedly already answered in the referenced works (1,2 and 4.) Unfortunately, that which the Navy knows, we do not know.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Uyttenhove, H.J.J. (1983). Comments on C. Bernard Barfoot. In: Wedde, H. (eds) Adequate Modeling of Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69208-6_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69208-6_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-12567-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69208-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive