Skip to main content

Connectionism, Knowledge Representation, and Effective Reasoning

  • Conference paper
Wissensbasierte Systeme

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((INFORMATIK,volume 227))

Abstract

Human cognitive agents are capable of representing highly structured knowledge and drawing a variety of inferences based on such knowledge with remarkable efficiency — almost as if by reflex. These inferences are by no means trivial and support a broad range of cognitive activity such as classifying and recognizing objects, understanding spoken and written language, and performing commonsense reasoning. Any serious attempt at understanding intelligence must provide a detailed computational account of how such knowledge may be represented and such inferences drawn with requisite efficiency. In this talk we will discuss some work within the connectionist framework that attempts to offer such an account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Derthick, M., Mundane reasoning by parallel constraint satisfaction, Ph.D. thesis, CMXJ-CS-88-182, Carnegie Mellon University, Sept. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fodor J.A. and Pylyshyn Z.W. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. In Connections and Symbols Steven Pinker and Jacques Mehler (eds.) The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frisch, A.M. and J.F. Allen, Knowledge retrieval as limited inference in D.W. Loveland (Ed.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: 6th Conference on Automated Deduction, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lakemeyer G. Tractable meta-reasoning in propositional logics of belief. In Proc. IJCAI-87 Milano, Italy, 1987. pp. 402–408.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Levesque, H. Logic and Complexity of Reasoning. KRR-TR-89-2, Computer Science Department, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schubert 89] Schubert, L.K. An Episodic Knowledge Representation for Narrative Texts. To appear in Proc. KR-89, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shastri, L. Semantic Networks: An evidential formalization and its connectionist realization. London: Pitman/Los Altos: Morgan Kaufman. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shastri, L. and V. Ajjanagadde. “A connectionist system for logical inference with multi-place predicates and variable bindings”. Technical Report MS-CS-89-06. Computer and Information Science Department, University of Pennsylvania, Jan. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shastri, L. (1989). Connectionism, Knowledge Representation, and Effective Reasoning. In: Brauer, W., Freksa, C. (eds) Wissensbasierte Systeme. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 227. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75182-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75182-0_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51838-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75182-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics