Abstract
Connectionist natural language processing research has been in the literature for less than a decade and yet it is already claimed that it has established a whole new way of looking at representation. This article presents a survey of the main representational techniques employed in connectionist research on natural language processing and assesses claims as to their novelty value i.e. whether or not they add anything new to Classical representation schemes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chalmers, D.J. (in press) Syntactic Transformations on Distributed Representations. Connection Science, 2.1.
Cottrell, G.W. (1985) A Connectionist Approach to Word Sense Disambiguation. PhD Thesis, TR154, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, NY.
Cottrell, G.W., Munro, P. & Zipser, D. (1989) Image Compression by Back Propagation: An Example of Extensional Programming. In N.E. Sharkey (Ed) Models of Cognition: A Review of Cognitive Science. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
Dolan, C.P. & Smolensky, P. (1989) Tensor Production System: a Modular Architecture and Representation. Connection Science 1(1), 53–68.
Elman, J.L (1988) Finding the structure in time. TR 880, CRL, University of California, San Diego.
Elman, J.L. (1989) Representation and structure in connectionist models. IR 8903, CRL, University of California, San Diego.
Feldman, J.A. (1989) Neural Representation of Conceptual Knowledge. In N.E. Sharkey (Ed) Models of Cognition: A Review of Cognitive Science. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
Fillmore, C.J. (1968) The Case for Case. In E. Bach and R. Harris (Eds) Universalsin Linguistic Theory. Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
Fodor, J.A. & McLaughlin, B. (1990) Connectionism and the Problems of Systemacity I:Why Smolensky’s Solution Doesn’t Work. Cognition, 35, 183–204.
Fodor, J.A, & Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1988). Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis. Cognition, 28, 2–71.
Hinton, G.E. (1981) Implementing Semantic Networks in Parallel Hardware. In G.E. Hinton & J.A. Anderson (Eds) Parallel Models of Associative Memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hinton, G.E. (1986) Learning Distributed Representations of Concepts. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Hinton, G.E. (1989) Connectionist Learning Procedures. Artificial Intelligence, 40, 184–235.
Hinton, G.E., McClelland, J.L. & Rumelhart, D.E. (1986) Distributed Representations. In D.E. Rumelhart & J.L. McClelland (Eds) Parallel Distributed Processing, Volume 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Hopfield, J.J. (1982) Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent Collective Computational Abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 79, 2554–2558.
Hornik, K. Stinchcombe, M. & White, H. (1989) Multilayer Feedfoewrad Network are Univesal Approximators. Discussion paper 88–45R. Department of Economics, UCSD.
Jordan, M.I. (1986) Attractor Dynamics and parallelism in a Connectionist Sequential Machine. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amherst, MA. 531–545.
Kohonen, T. (1982) Clustering, Taxonomy, and Topological Maps of Patterns. In M. Lang (Ed) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Silver Spring, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Kolen, J.F. & Pollack, J.B. (1990) Back Propagation is Sensitive to Initial Conditions. Technical Report 90-JK-BPSIC. Ohio Satat University.
McClelland, J.L. & Kawamoto A.H. (1986) Mechanisms of Sentence Processing:Assigning Roles to Constituents. In J.L. McClelland & D.E. Rumelhart (Eds) Parallel Distributed Processing Volume 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
McClelland, J.L. & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981) An Interactive Activation Model of Effects in Letter Perception: Part I. An Account of Basic Findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
Miikkulainen, R. & Dyer, M. G. (1987) Building Distributed Representations without Microfeatures. Technical Report UCLA-AI-87–17, AI Laboratory, Computer Science Department, University of California at Los Angeles, CA.
Minsky, M. (1975) A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In P.H. Winston (Ed) The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Minsky, M. (1975) A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In P.H. Winston (Ed) The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Robbins, A. (1989) The Distributed Representation of Type and Category. Connection Science1. 4.
Schank, R.C. (1972) Conceptual dependency: a theory of natural language understanding. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 552–631.
Sejnowski, T.J. & Rosenberg, C.R. (1986) A Parallel Network that Learns to Read Out Loud. Technical Report JHU/SECS-86/01. John Hopkins University.
Servan-Schreiber, D., Cleermans, A., & McClelland, J.L. (1988) Encoding sequential structure in simple recurrent nets. TR CMU-CS-88–183. Computer Science department, Carnegie-Mellon University.
Sharkey, N.E. (1989a) The Lexical Distance Model and Word Priming. Proceedings of the Eleventh Cognitive Science Society.
Sharkey, N.E. (1989b) Lexical Representations for Prepositional Attachment. Report to British Telecom CONNEX Project.
Sharkey, N.E. (1989c) A PDP Learning Approach to Natural Language Understanding. In I. Aleksander (Ed) Neural Computing Architectures. London: North Oxford Academic.
Sharkey, N.E. (1989c) A PDP Learning Approach to Natural Language Understanding. In I. Aleksander (Ed) Neural Computing Architectures. London: North Oxford Academic.
Shastri L. & Feldman J.A. (1986) Neural Nets, Routines and Semantic Networks. In N.E. Sharkey (Ed) Advances in Cognitive Science. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
Shastri L. & Feldman J.A. (1986) Neural Nets, Routines and Semantic Networks. In N.E. Sharkey (Ed) Advances in Cognitive Science. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
Smolensky, P. (1988) On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism. Behavioraland Brain Sciences, 11, 1–74.
Smolensky, P. (1988) On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism. Behavioraland Brain Sciences, 11, 1–74.
Smolensky, P. (1988) On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism. Behavioraland Brain Sciences, 11, 1–74.
Touretzky, D.S. & Geva, S. (1987) A Distributed Connectionist Representation for Concept Structures. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 155–164.
Touretzky, D.S. & Hinton, G.E. (1988) A Distributed Connectionist Production System. Cognitive Science 12(3), 423 - 466.
Van Gelder, T. (1990) Compositionality: a Connectionist Variation on a Classical Theme. Cognitive Science, 14.
Wickelgren, W.W.A.(1969) Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior. Psychological Review, 76, 1–15.
Willshaw, D.J. & von der Malsburg, C. (1979) A Marker Induction Mechanism for the Establishment of Ordered Neural Mapping: Its Application to the Retino-tectal Connections. In Philos, Trans, Roy, Soc. Lond. B 287, 203 - 243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sharkey, N.E. (1990). Connectionist Representations for Natural Language: Old and New. In: Dorffner, G. (eds) Konnektionismus in Artificial Intelligence und Kognitionsforschung. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 252. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76070-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76070-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53131-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-76070-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive