Abstract
A simulation is presented here that demonstrates how a standard BP net, taking whole sentences as input, may be trained to perform a structural disambiguation task and to generalise to novel examples. It is argued that, during learning, the net implements raw attachment preferences in the relationship between the upper and lower weights. An analysis is provided of how these preferences are implemented, and it is shown how each individual word may be assigned a raw preference value (RPV) which may be used as an indicator of its structural bias. Moreover, it is shown how the activation function makes use of the raw preferences by modulating their strength of their biases in a manner that is contextually sensitive to the structural biases of all the other words in a sentence.
This project was funded by an award from the British Telecom Research Laboratories at Martlesham Heath (under the CONNEX iniative). I would like to thank Richard Sutcliffe (RA on the project) for running the simulation and Paul Day for conducting the normative study. I would also like to acknowledge Don Mitchell, Ajit Narayanan. and Peter Wyard for their support and suggestions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ford, M., Bresnan, J.W. & Kaplan, R.M. (1982) A Competence Based Theory of Syntactic Closure. In J.W. Bresnan The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Frazier, L. & Fodor, J.D. (1978) The Sausage Machine. A New Two-stage Parsing Model. Cognition 6.
Hanson, S.J. & Burr, D.J. (in press) What Connectionist Models Learn: Learning and Representation in Connectionist Networks. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, New York:CUP.
Hinton, G.E. (1981) Implementing Semantic Networks in Parallel Hardware. In G.E. Hinton & J.A. Anderson (Eds) Parallel Models of Associative Memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kimball, J. (1973) Seven Principles of Surface Structure Parsing in Natural Language. Cognition 2.
McMillan, C. & Smolensky, P. (1988) Analyzing a Connectionist Model as a System of Soft Rules. Technical Report CU-CS-393–88, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Mozer, M.C. & Smolensky, P. (1989) Using Relevance to Reduce Network Size Automatically. Connection Science 1. 1.
Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E. & Williams, R.J. (1986) Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation. In D.E. Rumelhart & J.L. McClelland (Eds) Parallel Distributed Processing Volume 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Wilks, Y. Huang, X. & Fass, D. (1985) Syntax, Preference and Right Attachment. Proceedings of IJCAI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sharkey, N.E. (1990). Implementing Soft Preferences for Structural Disambiguation. In: Dorffner, G. (eds) Konnektionismus in Artificial Intelligence und Kognitionsforschung. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 252. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76070-9_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76070-9_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53131-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-76070-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive