Skip to main content

Connectionist Cognition

  • Conference paper
  • 66 Accesses

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((INFORMATIK,volume 252))

Abstract

In an influential and provocative paper, Fodor and Pylyshyn (1988) have argued that the architecture of mind cannot be connectionist ”at the cognitive level”. Very briefly, they maintain that explanation of cognitive capacities requires a domain of complex mental representations with combinatorial syntactic and semantic structure to account for features of cognition like systematicity, compositionality and inferential coherence. Since connectionist models lack these complex representations (while still being committed, as Fodor and Pylyshyn claim, to the concept of representation as such), these models are inadequate for the explanation of cognitive skills. But (so they generously concede) connectionist models might still turn out to be — or be interpreted as — implementations of ”classical” symbol-processing accounts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bogdan, R.J. (1989): Does semantics run the psyche? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49: 687–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1988): Critical notice: Psychosemantics: the problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind (JA. Fodor). Mind 97: 605–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1989): Microcognition: philosophy, cognitive science, and parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. (1989): Meaning and mental representation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1987): Evolution, error, and intentionality. In: Dennett, D.: The intentional stance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press: 287–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. (1988): Explaining behavior. Reasons in a world of causes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A. (1987): Psychosemantics: the problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A., Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1988): Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis. Cognition 28: 3–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goschke, Th., Koppelberg, D. (1990a): Connectionism and the semantic content of internal representation. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 172: 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goschke, Th., Koppelberg, D. (1990a): Connectionism and the semantic content of internal representation. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 172: 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, G. (1989): Klassische vs. konnektionistische Modelle in der Kognitiven Psychologie. In: Becker, B. (Hrsg.): Zur Terminologie in der Kognitionsforschung. St. Augustin: GMD: 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F., Pettit, P. (1988): Functionalism and broad content. Mind 97: 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurthen, M. (1990): Das Problem des Bewußtseins in der Kognitionswissenschaft. Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lischka, C. (1987): Ober die Blindheit des Wissensingenieurs, die Geworfenheit kognitiver Systeme und anderes. KI 4: 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C. (1989): Mental content. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G. (1984): Language, thought, and other biological categories. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G. (1989): Biosemantics. Journal of Philosophy 86: 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. (1989): Discussion of Jackson and Pettit, ‘Functionalism and broad content’. Mind 98: 269–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1956): Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In: Feigl, H., Scriven, M. (eds.): Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. 1. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 253–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1979): Naturalism and ontology. Reseda, Cal.: Ridgeview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P. (1987): The constituent structure of connectionist mental states: a reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 26: 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S. (1983): From folk psychology to cognitive science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding computers and cognition. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kurthen, M., Linke, D.B., Hamilton, P. (1990). Connectionist Cognition. In: Dorffner, G. (eds) Konnektionismus in Artificial Intelligence und Kognitionsforschung. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 252. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76070-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76070-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53131-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-76070-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics