Skip to main content

A New and Simple Method for Explicit Computation of a Circumscription

  • Conference paper
GWAI-90 14th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((INFORMATIK,volume 251))

Abstract

We present a new and simple method for explicit computation of a circumscription CIRC(T, P, Q) by constructing a set of clauses T0 such that CIRC(T, P, Q) = Th(T⋃T0). The advantage of an explicit form of CIRC(T, P, Q) is that one can apply an ordinary inferencing method to T ⋃ T0 to answer a query. The particular features of our algorithm are: (1) We show that the search for the clauses T0 can be restricted to the subset of clauses which consist of at least one negative literal in the predicates P and zero or more literals in the predicates Q. This is an improvement over the related results in [3]. (2) We do not use the equality predicate as is done in [7, 18], and (3) We compute the clauses T0 by using predicate completion [4] based on a small subset of the clauses in Th(T) which consist of at least one positive literal in P and zero or more literals in Q. We assume in this paper that the theory T is given by a set of ground clauses without function symbols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Przymusinsky, T„ An algorithm to compute circumscription, Artificial Intelligence 38(1989), pp. 49–73.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ginsberg, M. L., A circumscriptive theorem prover, Artificial Intelligence 39 (1989), pp. 209–230.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Gelfond, M., Przymusinska, H. and Przymusinsky, T., On the relationship between circumscription and negation as failure, Artificial Intelligence 38 (1989), pp. 75–94.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, K.L., Negation as failure, in H. Gallaire and J. Minker (Eds.), Logic and Databases, Plenum Press, New York, (1978), pp. 293–322.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McCarthy, J., Circumscription — a form of non-monotonic reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 13 (1980), pp. 27–39.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. McCarthy, J., Applications of circumscription to formalizing common-sense knowledge, Artificial Intelligence 28 (1986), pp. 89–116.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lifschitz, V., Computing circumscription, Proceedings IJCAL-85, Los Angeles, CA (1985), pp. 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lifschitz, V., Pointwise circumscription, Proceedings AAAI-86, Philadelphia, PA (1986), pp. 406–410.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Apt, K., Blair, H. and Walker, A., Towards a theory of declarative knowledge, in J. Minker (Ed.), Foundations of Deductive databases and Logic Programming Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA (1988), pp. 89–148.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reiter, R., Circumscription implies predicate completion (sometimes), Proceedings AAAI-82, Pittsburgh, PA (1982), pp. 418–420.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gelfond, M., Przymusinska, H. and Przymusinsky, T., The extended closed world assumption and its relationship to parallel circumscription, Proceedings of Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, Cambridge, MA (1986), pp. 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shepherdson, J., Negation as failure: a comparison of Clark’s completed databases and Reiter’s closed world assumption, Journal of Logic programming, 1 (1984), pp. 51–79.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lifschitz, V., Close-world databases and circumscription, Artificial Intelligence 27 (1985), pp. 229–235.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Bossu, G and Siegel, P., Saturation, non-monotonic reasoning and the closed world assumption, Artificial Intelligence 25 (1985), pp. 13–63.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Etherington, D., Mercer, R. and Reiter, R., On the adequacy of predicate circumscription for closed-world reasoning, Computational Intelligence, 1(1985), pp. 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gelfond, M. and Przymusinska, H., On the relationship between autoepistemic logic and parallel circumscription, Proceedings of Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, Cambridge, MA (1986), pp. 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Imielinski, T., Results on translating defaults to circumscription, Artificial Intelligence 32 (1987), pp. 131–146.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rabinov, A., A generalization of collapsible cases of circumscription, artificial Intelligence, 38(1989), pp. 111–117

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kundu, S., Chen, J. (1990). A New and Simple Method for Explicit Computation of a Circumscription. In: Marburger, H. (eds) GWAI-90 14th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 251. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76071-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76071-6_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53132-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-76071-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics