Skip to main content

Problems of Autonomy and Discontexturality in the Theory of Living Systems

  • Conference paper
Analyse dynamischer Systeme in Medizin, Biologie und Ökologie

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((INFORMATIK,volume 275))

Abstract

In the theory of living systems any description of self-organizing processes is confronted by a very central problem concerning the role of the system’s boundary, i.e., there is the necessity of a simultaneous formal representation of the inside and the outside of a system.

On the other hand, in a theory of self-organization restricted to changes of states within a system, which may be defined by some physical state variables, the question of the boundary has been eliminated and the distinction between a system and its environment (its inside and outside) generally is interpreted as an information process between both, the system and the environment.

In the theory of autopoietic systems (TAS), on the other hand, it is the autonomy of a system which plays a fundamental role and therefore the TAS represents a theory of self-organization in relation to a system and its environment and not primarily a theory of self-organization of states within a system. This, however, results in the logical problem of circularity as an immediate consequence of the postulated closure of any living system.

As a result of the closure principle, the distinction between a system and its environment (the boundary of a system) interpreted as an information transfer in the theory of self-organizalion cannot be established any longer as a primarily relevant process in the theory of autopoietic systems.

For an adequate description of closed systems it is the discontexturality between autonomous and non-autonomous systems which takes the place of the ‘system-environment-relation’. On the basis of the theory of poly-contextural logic discontexturality between a system and its environment results as an explication and conceptual precision of the ‘structural coupling concept’ as introduced in the theory of autopoietic systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • FOERSTER, VON H. (1980): ‘Kybernetik einer Erkenntnistheorie’, in: Sicht und Einsicht, Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • GÜNTHER, G. (1968): ‘Many-Valued Designations and a Hierarchy of First Order Ontologies’ Akten des X. lnterantionalen Kongresses für Philosophie, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • GÜNTHER, G. (1980): Beiträge zur Grundlegung einer operationsfähigen Dialektik, Vol. HIJ, Felix Meiner-Verlag, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • KAEHR, R. (1981) in: Idee und Grundriss einer nicht-Aristotelischen Logik (G. Günther, ed.), Felix Meiner-Verlag, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAEHR, R. & VON GOLDAMMER, E. (1988): ‘Again Computers and the Brain’, in: Journal of Molecular Electronics, Vol.4, p.31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAEHR, R. & VON GOLDAMMER, E. (1989): ‘Poly-contextural modelling of heterarchies in brain functions’, in: Models of Brain Function (R.M.J. Cotterill, ed.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 463–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAES, P. (1988): ‘Computational Reflection’, in: The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 3, p. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • MATURANA, H.R. & VARELA, J.F. (1980): ‘Autopoiesis: The Organization of the Living’, in: Autopoiesis and Cognition, Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science (R.S. Cohen, M.W. Wartofsky, eds.) Vol. 42, D. Reidel Publ., Dodrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • MATURANA, H.R. (1985): Erkennen: Die Organisation und Verkörperung von Wirklichkeit, Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • VARELA, J.F. (1979): ‘Principles of Biological Autonomy’, in: General Systems Research (G. Klir, ed.) Vol. 2, North Holland Publ., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • WIENER, N. & ROSENBLUTH, A. (1943) in: Philosophy of Science, Vol. 10, p.18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

von Goldammer, E., Kaehr, R. (1991). Problems of Autonomy and Discontexturality in the Theory of Living Systems. In: Möller, D.P.F., Richter, O. (eds) Analyse dynamischer Systeme in Medizin, Biologie und Ökologie. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 275. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77020-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77020-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54669-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77020-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics