Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Erklärung Als Argumentativer Gruppendiskurs

  • Conference paper
Erklärung im Gespräch — Erklärung im Mensch-Maschine-Dialog

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((2252,volume 310))

  • 46 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das Tracing-Konzept ist die in Expertensystemen bislang verbreitetste Form für die Organisation von Erklärungsprozessen—ein Protokoll der Ableitungsgeschichle einer systemseilig generierten Problemlösung wird zugleich als Erklärung benutzt. Dies ist schon für Ein-Benutzer-Szenarien problematisch, für Gruppen-Problemlösungsprozesse, in deren Verlauf mehrere unterschiedlich spezialisierte menschliche Akteure und technische Entschcidungsunterslützungswerkzeuge bei der Lösung komplexer Problemstellungen kooperieren, jedoch vollends unakzepiabel. Dazu muß das bislang gebräuchliche zu cinfache Erklärungskonzept um subtilere Mechanismen (wie die Ansteuerung unterschiedlicher Abstraktionsebenen und Granularitäten von Erklärungen bzw. eingegrenzten Erklärungsteilen, (Re-)Konstruktion von Erklärungen in argumentativen Erklärungsdebatten, Analyse und Auflösung von Erklärungsfehlern durch Kritisierung von Erklärungen) eines gruppenhandlungsorientierten Argumentationsmodells erweitert werden. Seine grundlegenden Elemente werden in diesem Beitrag skizziert und am Beispiel eines Interaktionsfragments im Konlext des Gruppen-Informalionssyslems CoNeX vorgestellt.

Die hier beschriebenen Forschungsarbeitcn werden im Rahmen des DFG-Schwerpunktbcrcichs “Objektbanken für Experten“ von der Deulschen Forschungsgemeinschafi (DFG) unter der Fürdernummer Ja 445/1-1 gefördert und wurden im wesentlichen an der Universität Passau ausgeführt.

Ich möchte mich für die Implementation des Konferenzsystcms bei Rainer Gallersdörfer besonders herzlich bedanken. Matthias Jarke hat mir das Themengcbict crschlossen und durch seine Kommentare zur Entwicklung des Modells beigetragen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Bonfiglio, A./G. Malatesta/ F. Tisato [1991]: Conference Toolkit—A Framework for Real-Time Conferencing. J.M. Bowers & S.D. Benford (eds), Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Theory, Practice and Design. Amsterdam etc.: North-Holland, pp.63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgida, A./T. Imielinski [1984]: Decision Making in Committees—A Framework for Dealing with Inconsistency and Non-Monotonicity. Proc. of the Non-Monotonic Reasoning Workshop. Oct. 17–19,1984, New Paltz, NY, pp.21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.C./B. Chandrasekaran [1985]: Expert Systems for a Class of Mechanical Design Activity. J.S. Gero (ed), Knowledge Engineering in Computer-Aided Design. Budapest, Hungary, Sept. 1984. Amsterdam etc.: North-Holland, pp.259–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. [1986]: Participant Systems. Future Computing Systems, Vol.1, No.3, pp.253–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, W.J. [1984]: Extensions to Rules for Explanation and Tutoring. B.G. Buchanan/ E.H. Shortliffe (eds), Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Reading/MA etc.: Addison-Wesley, pp.531–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, H. [1982]: A Formalism for the Structural Analysis of Dialogues. COLING 82: Proc. of the 9th Intl. Conf. on Computational Linguistics. Prague, July 5–10, 1982, pp.61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J./M.L. Begeman [1988]: gIBIS—A Hypertext Tool for Exploratory Policy Discussion. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol.6, No.4, pp.303–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R./R.G. Smith [1983]: Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. Artificial Intelligence, Vol.20, No. 1, pp.63–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T.E. [1980]: Textwissenschaft—eine interdisziplinäre Einfuhrung. Mlinchen: dtv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. [1979]: A Truth Maintenance System. Artificial Intelligence, Vol.12, pp.231–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. [1985]: Reasoned Assumptions and Pareto Optimally. IJCAI-85: Proc. of the 9th Intl. JointConf. on Artificial Intelligence. Vol.1. 18-23 Aug. 1985, Los Angeles, Cal., pp.87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eherer, S./M. Jarke/ U. Hahn [1990]: Eine Software-Umgebung für die Erstellung von Hy-permedia-Dokumenten durch Autorengruppen. P. Gloor & N. Streitz (eds), Hypertext und Hypermedia: von theoretischen Konzepten zur praktischen Anwendung. Berlin: Springer, pp.79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eherer, S./M. Jarke/ M. Jeusfeld/ A. Miethsam/ T. Rose [1989]: A Global KBMS for Database Software Evolution—ConceptBase 2.0 User Manual. Passau: Universität Passau, Fakul-tät für Mathematik und Informatik (MIP-8936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, A./A.-L. Johansson [1985]: Neat Explanation of Proof Trees. IJCAI-85: Proc. of the 9th Intl. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 1, 18–23 August 1985, Los Angeles, Cal., pp.379–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, A. [1989]: Modifying the Model Set during Diagnosis. GWAI-89: Proc. I3th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence. Eringerfeld, Sept. 18–22, 1989. Berlin: Springer, pp.388–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, M./R. Mcguire/ L. Birnbaum [1982]: Adversary Arguments and the Logic of Personal Attacks. W.G. Lehnert & M.H. Ringle (eds), Strategies for Natural Language Processing. Hillsdale/NJ, London: L. Erlbaum, pp.275–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, BJ. [1989]: Collaborative Planning for Discourse (Abstract). IJCAI-89: Proc. of the 11th Intl. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 2. Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A., 20–25 Aug. 1989. San Mateo/CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp.774–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, U. [1989]: Dialogstrukturen in Gruppendiskussionen—Ein Modell für argumentative Verhand-lungen mehrerer Agenten. GWAI-89: Proc. 13th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence. Eringerfeld,-Sept. 18–22, 1989. Berlin etc.: Springer, pp.409–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, U./M. Jarke/ S. Eherer/ K. Kreplin [1991]: CoAUTHOR—A Hypermedia Group Authoring Environment. J.M. Bowers & S.D. Benford (eds), Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Theory, Practice andDesign. Amsterdam etc.: North-Holland, pp.79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, U./M. Jarke/ T. Rose [1990]: Group Work in Software Projects—Integrated Conceptual Models and Collaboration Tools. S. Gibbs & A.A. Verrijn-Stuart (eds), Multi-User Interfaces and Applications. Proc. of the IFIP WG8.4 Conf. on Multi-User Interfaces and Applications. Herak-lion, Crete, Greece, Sept. 24–26,1990. Amsterdam etc.: North-Holland, pp.83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidrich, C.H. [1982]: Montague-Grammers [sic!] for Argumentative Dialogues. E.M. Barth & J.L. Martens (eds), Argumentation. Approaches to Theory Formulation.Contnbutions to the Groningen Conf. on the Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, pp.191–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel. C.G. [1965]: Aspects of Scientific Explanation. C.G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Pr., pp.331–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G./P. Oppenheim [1965]: Studies in the Logic of Explanation. C.G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Pr., pp.245–290. (Nachdruck aus Philosophy of Science, Vol.15, 1948, pp.135-175).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhns, M.N./L.M. Stephens/ R.D. Bonnell [1983]: Control and Cooperation in Distributed Expert Systems. Proc. of the IEEE Southeastcon. April 1983, pp.241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarke, M./U. Hahn [1987]: Verhandlungskonzepte für die rechnergestützte Teamarbeit. Proc. GI-17. Jahrestagung. Munchen, 20.-23. Okt. 1987. Berlin: Springer, pp.654–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandt, K. [1987]: A Tool to Support Competitive Argumentation. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.3, No.4, pp.54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleer, J. de [1986]: An Assumption-Based TMS. Artificial Intelligence, Vol.28, pp. 127–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, W. [1980]: Argumentation and Argument. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, Vol.10, Nos.38/39, pp.9–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornfeld, W.A./Ce. Hewitt [1981]: The Scientific Community Metaphor. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-11, No. 1 (Jan), pp.24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, D. [1985]: Cooperative Structuring of Information—The Representation of Reasoning and Debate. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol.23, pp.97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, K.R./M. Wish/ K. Matthews [1985]: Tailoring Explanations for the User. IJCAI-85: Proc. of the 9th Intl. Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 2, 18-23 August 1985, Los Angeles, Cal., pp.794–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos, J./A. Borgida/ M. Jarke/ M. Koubarakis [1990]: Telos—A Language for Representing Knowledge about Information Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 8, No.4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neches, R./W.R. S Wartout/ J.D. Moore [1985]: Enhanced Maintenance and Explanation of Expert Systems through Explicit Models of their Development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-11, No. 11 (Nov), pp. 1337–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. [1976]: Logik der Forschung. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 19766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rychener, M.D./R. Banares-Alcantara/ E. Subrahmanian [1984]: A Rule-Based Blackboard Kernel System: Some Principles in Design. Proc. of the IEEE Workshop on Principles of Knowledge-Based Systems. Denver, Colorado, Dec. 3-4, 1984, pp.59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G. [1991]: Erklärungsmodelle in der Wissenschaftstheorie und in der Künstlichen Intelli-genz. (in diesem Band).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A.C./Wj. Clancey/ R. Davis/ E.H. Shortliffe [1984]: Methods for Generating Explanations. B.G. Buchanan & E.H. Shortliffe (eds), Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Reading/MA etc.: Addison-Wesley, pp.338–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.L./W.H. Graves/ L.H. Blaine/ V.G. Marinov [1975]: Computer-Assisted Axiomatic Mathematics—Informal Rigor. O. Lacarme & R. Lewis (eds), Computers in Education. Part 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp.803–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • SÖkeland, W. [1981]: Erklärungen und Argumentationen in wissenschaftlicher Kommunikation. T. Bungarten (ed), Wissenschaftssprache: Beiträge zur Methodologie, theoretischen Fundierung und Deskription. München: W. Fink, pp.261–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stansfeeld, J.L./B.P. Carr/ I.P. Goldstein [1976]: WUMPUS Advisor I—A First Implementation of a Program that Tutors Logical and Probabilistic Reasoning Skills. Cambridge/MA: AI Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Memo 381).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefik, M. et al.[1987]: Beyond the Chalkboard—Computer Support for Collaboration and Problem Solving in Meetings. Communications of the ACM, Vol.30, No. 1, pp.32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. [1980]: Question Ordering in Mixed Initiative Program Specification Dialogue. AAAI 1980 Conference. Proc. of the 1st Annual National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Stanford Univ., Aug. 18-21, 1980, pp.61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoyan, H. [1991]: Erklarungen und Beweise. (in diesem Band).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartout, W.R. [1977]: A Digitalis Therapy Advisor with Explanations. IJCAI-77: Proc. of the 5th Intl. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A., Aug. 22-25, 1977, pp.819–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sycara, K.P. [1989]: Argumentation—Planning Other Agents’ Plans. IJCAI-89: Proc. of the IIth Intl. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 1. Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A., 20-25 Aug. 1989. San Mateo/CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp.517–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. [1958]: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S./R. Reeke/ A. Janik [1979]: An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigg, R.H. [1988]: Guided Tours and Tabletops—Tools for Communicating in a Hypertext Environment. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems,Vol.6, No.4, pp.398–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, J.W./ E.H. Shortliffe [1984]: Customized Explanations Using Causal Knowledge. B.G. Buchanan & E.H. Shortliffe (eds), Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Reading/MA etc.: Addison-Wesley, pp.371–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J.L. [1980]: BLAH—A System which Explains its Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, Vol.15, pp. 19–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. [1987]: A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work. Human-Computer Interaction, Vol.3, 1987-1988, No. 1, pp.3–30.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W.-K.C. [1986]: A Theory of Argument Coherence. Austin/DC: Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Univ. of Texas at Austin (AI TR 86-29).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Linguistische Informatik/Computerlinguistik Werthmannplatz, D-7800, Freiburg, Germany

    Udo Hahn

Authors
  1. Udo Hahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Informatik VIII, IMMD, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Am Weichselgarten 9, W-8520, Erlangen-Tennenlohe, Germany

    Herbert Stoyan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hahn, U. (1992). Erklärung Als Argumentativer Gruppendiskurs. In: Stoyan, H. (eds) Erklärung im Gespräch — Erklärung im Mensch-Maschine-Dialog. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 310. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77448-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77448-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55388-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77448-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation