Skip to main content

An Analysis of Uncertainty in British General Practice: Implications of a Preliminary Survey

  • Conference paper
AIME 89

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics ((LNMED,volume 38))

Abstract

Relatively little is known about the extent or nature of doctors’ uncertainty in clinical practice. While clinical decision making has been studied extensively by workers such as Elstein [Elstein et al 1978], Gale and Marsden [1985] and Johnson [Johnson 1982; Johnson et al. 1983], none of these studies shed much light on the question of when, or how frequently, doctors themselves feel uncertain about diagnosis or management. This is surprising considering the number of efforts under way to develop clinical decision aids. Since a major factor in determining the readiness (or reluctance) of users to take up a new technology is the extent to which the technology meets users’ felt needs, determining detailed requirements is important. As the emphasis in designing systems shifts towards the user interface and integration systems [Shneiderman 1987; Shortliffe, 1987], the lack of information about how, when and where doctors experience uncertainty is a significant limitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barrett, M and Roberts, H (1978) Doctors and their patients: the social control of women in general practice. in C Smart and B Smart (eds). Women, Sexuality and Social Control. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. pp 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentsen BG (1970) Illness and General Practice. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke JB, Rector AL and Sheldon MG (1983). A review of studies of decision making in general practice. Medical Informatics 9:45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooke JB and Sheldon MG (1985). Clinical decision = patient with problem + doctor with problem. In MG Sheldon, JB Brooke and AL Rector (eds). Decision Making in General Practice. MacMillaPress Ltd, London. pp 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, A and Anderson, R (1981) General Practice Revisited: A Second Study of Patients and their Doctors. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstein AS, Shulman LS & Sprafka SA (1978). Medical Problem Solving. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Glowinski A, O’Neil M (1987). The Oxford System of Medicine: a prototype information system for primary care. in J Fox, M Fieschi and R Engelbrecht (eds) Proceedings of AIME-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale J and Marsden P (1985). Diagnosis: process not product. in MG Sheldon JB Brooke and AL Rector (eds) Decision Making in General Practice. MacMillan Press Ltd, London pp 59–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howie JGR (1972). Diagnosis — the achilles heel? Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 22:33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PE (1983). What kind of expert should a system be?. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8:77–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PE, Duran AS, Moller J, Pietula M, Feltovich PJ and Swanson DB (1983). Expertise and error in diagnostic reasoning. Cognitive Science 3:235–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rector AL (1985). The knowledge based medical record — IMMEDIATE-I — a basis for clinical decision support in general practice in Stefanelli M (ed) Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, AIME-85. North Holland Press, pp 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rector AL (1986). Medical records, clinical information and knowledge based systems — the IMMEDIATE project. in J Bryant, J Roberts, and P Windsor (eds). Current Perspectives in Health Computing. BISL London pp 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rector AL, Newton PD and Marsden PH (1985) What kind of system does an expert need? In Proceedings of HCI-85, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, H (1985) The Patient Patients. Pandora, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of General Practitioners (1984). New classification of diseases and problems. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 34:125–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B (1987) Designing the User Interface. Addison Wessley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortliffe EH (1987). Computer programs to support clinical decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association 258:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder G, Mackie, D and Cooper J (1985) Gender and computers: two surveys of computer-related attitudes. Sex Roles 13:: 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young G (1981) A woman in medicine: Reflections from the inside. in H Roberts (ed) Women, Health and Reproduction. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 144–162.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rector, A.L., Brooke, J.B., Sheldon, M.G., Newton, P.D. (1989). An Analysis of Uncertainty in British General Practice: Implications of a Preliminary Survey. In: Hunter, J., Cookson, J., Wyatt, J. (eds) AIME 89. Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics, vol 38. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93437-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93437-7_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51543-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-93437-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics