Skip to main content

Fear and Happiness in “Re-Mission”: Teasing Out Emotional Gaming Events Responsible for Cancer Risk Perception

  • Conference paper
Games for Health

Abstract

Improving cancer risk perception among adolescents and young adults is a crucial public health goal that allows the prevention of cancer-initiating behaviors. Digital games can be implemented in health interventions to drive cancer risk perceptions.

This research experimentally examines how a video game called "Re-MissionTM" (HopeLab, Redwood City, CA) may create an environment in which perceived threat from virtual cancer cells can lead to emotional involvement and ultimately induce perceived cancer risk among healthy young adults. In "Re-Mission," players control a nano-robot that fights cancer cells inside cancer patients’ bodies. After baseline survey completion, participants (n = 118) played "Re-Mission" at low or high conflict (i.e., low, or high level of game challenges). Then, participants completed a postexperience survey.

Results from path analyses show that fear when being attacked by virtual cancer cells and happiness when killing cancer cells mediate pathways between conflict manipulation and change in cancer risk perception. These findings suggest that the study of emotions may aid researchers and designers in the identification of in-game events responsible for health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baranowski T., Cullen K.W., Basen-Engquist K., Wetter D.W., Cummings S., Martineau D.S., Prokhorov A.V., Chorley J., Beech B., Hergenroeder A.C.: Transitions out of high school: time of increased cancer risk? Prev. Med. 26:694 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elders M.J.: Preventing tobacco use among young people: a report of the Surgeon General: DIANE Publishing. (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Katz R.C., Meyers K., Walls J.: Cancer awareness and self-examination practices in young men and women. J. Behav. Med. 18(4):377–384 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rimal R.N.: Perceived risk and self‐efficacy as motivators: Understanding individuals’ long‐term use of health information. J. Commun. 51(4):633–654 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Champion V.L.: Instrument development for health belief model constructs. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 6(3):73–85 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Champion V.L.: Instrument refinement for breast cancer screening behaviors. Nurs. Res. 42(3):139–143 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Champion V.L.: Revisited susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening. Res. Nurs. Health 22(4):341–348 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rimal R.N., Real K.: Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change. Hum. Commun. Res. 29(3):370–399 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beale I.L., Kato P.M., Marin-Bowling V.M., Guthrie N., Cole S.W.: Improvement in cancer-related knowledge following use of a psychoeducational video game for adolescents and young adults with cancer. J. Adolescent Health 41(3):263–270 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kato P.M., Cole S.W., Bradlyn A.S., Pollock B.H.: A video game improves behavioral outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer: A randomized trial. Pediatrics 122(2):e305-e317 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khalil G.E.: When Losing Means Winning: The Impact of Conflict in a Digital Game on Young Adults’ Intentions to Get Protected from Cancer. Games Health Res. Dev. Clin. 1(4):279–286 (2012).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang H., Singhal A.: Entertainment-education through digital games. Serious games: Mechanisms and effects New York and London: Routledge 271–292 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bedwell W.L., Pavlas D., Heyne K., Lazzara E.H., Salas E.: Toward a taxonomy linking game attributes to learning: An empirical study. Simulat. Gaming (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crawford C.: The art of computer game design. Berkeley, CA: Osborne/McGraw-Hill; (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lindley C.A., Nacke L., Sennersten C.C.: Dissecting play-investigating the cognitive and emotional motivations and affects of computer gameplay. CGAMES08 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wong W.L., Shen C., Nocera L., Carriazo E., Tang F., Bugga S., Narayanan H., Wang H., Ritterfeld U.: Serious video game effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology ACM; 49–55 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klimmt C.: Dimensions and determinants of the enjoyment of playing digital games: A three-level model. In: Level up: Digital games research conference: 2003: Utrecht: Faculty of Arts, Utrecht University; 257 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ravaja N., Salminen M., Holopainen J., Saari T., Laarni J., Järvinen A.: Emotional response patterns and sense of presence during video games: potential criterion variables for game design. In: Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Humancomputer interaction: ACM; 339–347 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Slovic P., Finucane M.L., Peters E., MacGregor D.G.: Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal. 24(2):311–322 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Peters E.M., Burraston B., Mertz C.: An Emotion‐Based Model of Risk Perception and Stigma Susceptibility: Cognitive Appraisals of Emotion, Affective Reactivity, Worldviews, and Risk Perceptions in the Generation of Technological Stigma. Risk Anal. 24(5):1349–1367 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baumeister R.F., Vohs K.D., DeWall C.N., Zhang L.: How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 11(2):167–203 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ekman P.: Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York: Owl Books (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pantic M., Rothkrantz L.J.M.: Expert system for automatic analysis of facial expressions. Image Vision Comput. 18(11):881–905 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ekman P., Freisen W.V., Ancoli S.: Facial signs of emotional experience. J Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39(6):1125 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lipkus I.M., Iden D., Terrenoire J., Feaganes J.R.: Relationships among breast cancer concern, risk perceptions, and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility among African-American women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 8(6):533–539 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Consedine N.S., Magai C., Krivoshekova Y.S., Ryzewicz L., Neugut A.I.: Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review. Cancer Epidem. Biomar. 13(4):501–510 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  27. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., Sugawara H.M.: Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol. Methods 1(2):130–149 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khalil, G. (2013). Fear and Happiness in “Re-Mission”: Teasing Out Emotional Gaming Events Responsible for Cancer Risk Perception. In: Schouten, B., Fedtke, S., Bekker, T., Schijven, M., Gekker, A. (eds) Games for Health. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02897-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02897-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02896-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02897-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics