Abstract
X-ray phase-contrast imaging enhances soft-tissue contrast. The measured differential phase signal strength in a Talbot-Lau interferometer is dependent on the object's position within the setup. For large objects, this affects the tomographic reconstruction and leads to artifacts and perturbed phase values. In this paper, we propose a pipeline to learn a filter and additional weights to invert the weighted forward projection. We train and validate the method with a synthetic dataset. We tested our pipeline on the Shepp-Logan phantom, and found that our method suppresses the artifacts and the reconstructed image slices are close to the actual phase values quantitatively and qualitatively. In an ablation study we showed the superiority of our fully optimized pipeline.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Maier A, Steidl S, Christlein V, et al. Medical imaging systems: An introductory guide. vol. 11111. Springer; 2018.
Pfeiffer F, Weitkamp T, Bunk O, et al. Phase retrieval and differential phasecontrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources. Nat Phys. 2006;2(4):258–261.
Engelhardt M, Baumann J, Schuster M, et al. High-resolution differential phase
contrast imaging using a magnifying projection geometry with a microfocus X-ray source. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;90(22):224101.
Donath T, Chabior M, Pfeiffer F, et al. Inverse geometry for grating-based X-ray phase-contrast imaging. J Appl Phys. 2009;106(5):054703.
Chabior M, Schuster M, Schroer C, et al. Grating-based phase-contrast computed tomography of thick samples. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2012;693:138–142.
Felsner L, Würfl T, Syben C, et al. Reconstruction of voxels with position- and angle-dependent weightings. In: The 6th Int. Conf. on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography; 2020. p. 502–505.
Maier AK, Syben C, Stimpel B, et al. Learning with known operators reduces maximum error bounds. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1(8):373–380.
Würfl T, Hoffmann M, Christlein V, et al. Deep learning computed tomography: learning projection-domain weights from image domain in limited angle problems. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;37(6):1454–1463.
Syben C, Stimpel B, Roser P, et al. Known operator learning enables constrained projection geometry conversion: Parallel to cone-beam for hybrid MR/X-ray imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020;.
Van der Walt S, Schönberger JL, Nunez-Iglesias J, et al. Scikit-image: image processing in python. PeerJ. 2014;2:e453.
Shepp LA, Logan BF. The Fourier reconstruction of a head section. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1974;21(3):21–43.
Ramachandran GN, Lakshminarayanan AV. Three-dimensional reconstruction from radiographs and electron micrographs: Application of convolutions instead of Fourier transforms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1971;68(9):2236–2240.
Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: Bengio Y, LeCun Y, editors. 3rd Int. Conf. on Learning Representations; 2015. p. 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Roser, P., Felsner, L., Maier, A., Riess, C. (2021). Learning the Inverse Weighted Radon Transform. In: Palm, C., Deserno, T.M., Handels, H., Maier, A., Maier-Hein, K., Tolxdorff, T. (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2021. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33198-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33198-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-33197-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-33198-6
eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)