Skip to main content

Precision ICU Resource Planning

A Multimodal Model for Brain Surgery Outcomes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2025 (BVM 2025)

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 186 Accesses

Abstract

Although advances in brain surgery techniques have led to fewer postoperative complications requiring intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring, the routine transfer of patients to the ICU remains the clinical standard, despite its high cost. Predictive Gradient Boosted Trees based on clinical data have attempted to optimize ICU admission by identifying key risk factors pre-operatively; however, these approaches overlook valuable imaging data that could enhance prediction accuracy. In this work, we show that multimodal approaches that combine clinical data with imaging data outperform the current clinical data only baseline from 0.29 [F1] to 0.30 [F1], when only pre-operative clinical data is used and from 0.37 [F1] to 0.41 [F1], for pre- and post-operative data. This study demonstrates that effective ICU admission prediction benefits from multimodal data fusion, especially in contexts of severe class imbalance.

M. Fischer, F. M. Hauptmann and R. Peretzke—These authors contributed equally the most to this work.

J-O. Neumann and K. Maier-Hein—These authors contributed equally the least to this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schär RT, Tashi S, Branca M et al. How safe are elective craniotomies in elderly patients in neurosurgery today? A prospective cohort study of 1452 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg. 2021;134(4):1113–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Costa DK, Moss M. The cost of caring: emotion, burnout, and psychological distress in critical care clinicians. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(7):787–90.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beauregard CL, FriedmanWA.Routine use of postoperative ICU care for elective craniotomy: a cost-benefit analysis. Surg Neurol. 2003;60(6):483–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neumann JO, Schmidt S,NohmanAet al.Routine ICU surveillance after brain tumor surgery: patient selection using machine learning. J Clin Med. 2024;13(19).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pölsterl S, Wolf TN, Wachinger C. Combining 3D image and tabular data via the dynamic affine feature map transform. Proc MICCAI. 2021:688–98.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Naser PV, Maurer MC, Fischer M et al. Deep learning aided preoperative diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma. iScience. 2024;27(2):109023.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wald T, Ulrich C, Lukyanenko S et al. Revisiting MAE pre-training for 3D medical image segmentation. arXiv: 2410.23132. 2024.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Isensee F, Jäger P, Wasserthal J et al. batchgenerators – a python framework for data augmentation. Zenodo. 2020;3632567.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Peretzke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fischer, M. et al. (2025). Precision ICU Resource Planning. In: Palm, C., et al. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2025. BVM 2025. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-47422-5_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics