Skip to main content

Two-stage Approach for Low-dose and Sparse-angle CT Reconstruction using Backprojection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2025 (BVM 2025)

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 206 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a novel two-stage approach for computed tomography (CT) reconstruction, focusing on sparse-angle and low-dose setups to minimize radiation exposure while maintaining high image quality. Two-stage approaches consist of an initial reconstruction followed by a neural network for image refinement. In the initial reconstruction, we apply the backprojection (BP) instead of the traditional filtered backprojection (FBP). This enhances computational speed and offers potential advantages for more complex geometries, such as fan-beam and cone-beam CT. Additionally, BP addresses noise and artifacts in sparse-angle CT by leveraging its inherent noise-smoothing effect, which reduces streaking artifacts common in FBP reconstructions. For the second stage, we fine-tune the DRUNet proposed by Zhang et al. to further improve reconstruction quality. We call our method BP-DRUNet and evaluate its performance on a synthetically generated ellipsoid dataset alongside thewell-established LoDoPaBCT dataset. Our results show that BP-DRUNet produces competetive results in terms of PSNR and SSIM metrics compared to the FBP-based counterpart, FBPDRUNet, and delivers visually competitive results across all tested angular setups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hu Z, Gao J, Zhang N et al. An improved statistical iterative algorithm for sparse-view and limited-angle CT image reconstruction. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Natterer F. The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xia D, Cho S, Pan X. Backprojection-filtration reconstruction without invoking a spatially varying weighting factor. Med Phys. 2010;37(3):1201–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Herman GT. Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography. Springer London, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zeng G, Gullberg G. Can the backprojection filtering algorithm be as accurate as the filtered backprojection algorithm? Proc IEEE NSS. 1994;3:1232–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Cai J, GuoWet al. BackprojectionWiener deconvolution for computed tomographic reconstruction. Plos One. 2018;13(12):e0207907.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2017;42:60–88.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mazandarani FN, Babyn P, Alirezaie J. UNeXt: a low-dose CT denoising UNet model with the modified ConvNeXt block. Proc IEEE ICASSP. 2023:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xiong L, Li N, QiuWet al.Re-UNet: a novel multi-scale reverse U-shape network architecture for low-dose CT image reconstruction. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024;62:701–12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu T, Chaman A, Belius D et al. Learning multiscale convolutional dictionaries for image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Comput Imaging. 2022;8:425–37.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang K, Li Y, ZuoWet al. Plug-and-play image restoration with deep denoiser prior. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2022;44(10):6360–76.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Selig T, März T, Storath M et al. Low-dose CT image reconstruction by fine-tuning a UNet pretrained for Gaussian denoising for the downstream task of image enhancement. arXiv: 2403.03551. 2024.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Borg L, Jørgensen JS, Frikel J et al. Analyzing reconstruction artifacts from arbitrary incomplete X-ray CT data. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2018;11(4):2786–814.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frikel J, Quinto ET. Characterization and reduction of artifacts in limited angle tomography. Inverse Probl. 2013;29:125007.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leuschner J, Schmidt M, Baguer DO et al. LoDoPaB-CT, a benchmark dataset for low-dose computed tomography reconstruction. Sci Data. 2021;8:109.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv: 1412.6980. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Z, Bovik A, Sheikh H et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Proc. 2004;13(4):600–12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Setiadi DRIM. PSNR vs SSIM: imperceptibility quality assessment for image steganography. Multimed Tools Appl. 2020;80(6):8423–44.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aarle W van, Palenstijn WJ, De Beenhouwer J et al. The ASTRA toolbox: a platform for advanced algorithm development in electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy. 2015;157:35– 47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Selig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Selig, T., Bauer, P., Frikel, J., März, T., Storath, M., Weinmann, A. (2025). Two-stage Approach for Low-dose and Sparse-angle CT Reconstruction using Backprojection. In: Palm, C., et al. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2025. BVM 2025. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-47422-5_67

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics