Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Microphone-Array Hearing Aids

  • Chapter
Microphone Arrays

Part of the book series: Digital Signal Processing ((DIGSIGNAL))

Abstract

Microphone-array hearing aids provide a promising solution to the problems encountered by hearing-impaired persons when listening to speech in the presence of background noise. This chapter first discusses implementation issues and performance metrics specific to the hearing-aid application. A review of previous work on microphone-array hearing aids includes systems with directional microphones, fixed beamformers, adaptive beamformers, physiologically-motivated processing, and binaural outputs. Recent simulation results of one promising adaptive beamforming system are presented. The performance of microphone-array hearing aids depends heavily on the acoustic environments in which they are used. Additional information about the level of reverberation, number of interferers, and relative levels of interferers encountered by hearing-aid users in everyday situations is required to quantify the benefit of microphone-array hearing aids and to select the optimal processing strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Kramarow, H. Lentzner, R. Rooks, J. Weeks, and S. Saydah, Health and Aging Chartbook, National Center for Health Statistics, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.C. Davis, “The prevalence of hearing impairments and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britian,” Int. J. Epidemiol., vol. 18, pp. 911–917, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D.H. Wilson, P.G. Walsh, L. Sanchez, A.C. Davis, A.W. Taylor, G. Tucker, and I. Meagher, “The epidemiology of hearing impairment in an Australian adult population,” Int. J. Epidemiol., vol. 28, pp. 247–252, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Karlsmose, T. Lauritzen, and A. Parvin, “Prevalence of hearing impairment and subjective hearing problems in a rural Danish population ages 31–50 years,” Br. J. Audiol., vol. 33, pp. 395–402, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Uimonen, K. Huttunen, K. Jounio-Ervasti, and M. Sorri, “Do we know the real need for hearing rehabilitation at the population level? Hearing impairments in the 5- to 75-year-old cross-sectional Finnish population,” Br. J. Audiol., vol. 33, pp. 53–59, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Kochkin, “ ‘Baby Boomers’ spur growth in potential market, but penetration rate declines,” Hearing J., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Kochkin, “MarkeTrak V: Consumer satisfaction revisited,” Hearing J., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 38–55, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Kochkin, “MarkeTrak V: `Why my hearing aids are in the drawer’: The consumers’ perspective,” Hearing J., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 34–42, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Plomp, “A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired,” J. Speech Hear. Res., vol. 29, pp. 146–154, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Hochberg, A. Boothroyd, M. Weiss, and S. Hellman, “Effects of noise and noise suppression on speech perception by cochlear implant users,” Ear Hear., vol. 13, pp. 263–270, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T.J. Schwander and H. Levitt, “Effect of two-microphone noise reduction on speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., vol. 24, pp. 87–92, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Cremer and H.A. Müller, Principles and Applications of Room Acoustics, (T.J. Schultz, translator ), Applied Science Publishers, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P.M. Peterson, Adaptive array processing for multiple microphone hearing aids, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA, USA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.E. Greenberg, P.M. Peterson, and P.M. Zurek, “Intelligibility-weighted measures of speech-to-interference ratio and speech system performance,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 94, pp. 3009–3010, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ANSI, American National Standard Methods for the Calculation of the Articulation Index, ANSI S3.5–1969,American National Standards Institute, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.B. Nielsen and C. Ludvigsen, “Effect of hearing aids with directional microphones in different acoustic environments,” Scand. Audiol., vol. 7, pp. 217–224, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D.B. Hawkins and W.S. Yacullo, “Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation,” J. Speech Hear. Disord., vol. 49, pp. 278–286, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Bächler and A. Vonlanthen, “Audio Zoom - Signal processing for improved communication in noise,” Phonak Focus, vol. 18, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. GN Resound: personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.W. Stadler and W.M. Rabinowitz, “On the potential of fixed arrays for hearing aids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 94, pp. 1332–1342, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Valente, D.A. Fabry, and L.G. Potts, “Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., vol. 6, pp. 203–210, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Valente, G. Schuchman, L G Potts, and L.B. Beck, “Performance of dual-microphone in-the-ear hearing aids,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., vol. 11, pp. 181–189, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A.R. Leeuw and W.A. Dreschler, “Advantages of directional hearing aid microphones related to room acoustics,” Audiol., vol. 30, pp. 330–344, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Liu and S. Sideman, “Simulations of fixed microphone arrays for directional hearing aids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 100, pp. 848–856, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J.M. Kates and M.R. Weiss, “A comparison of hearing-aid array-processing techniques,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 99, pp. 3138–3148, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Saunders and J. Kates, “Speech intelligibility enhancement using hearing-aid array processing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 102, pp. 1827–1837, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. W. Soede, A.J. Berkhout, and F.A. Bilsen, “Development of a directional hearing instrument based on array technology,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,vol. 94, pp. 785798, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. W. Soede, F.A. Bilsen, and A.J. Berkhout, “Assessment of a directional microphone array for hearing impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 94, pp. 799–808, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. B. Widrow and M.N. Brearley, “Directional hearing aid,” U.S. Patent no. 4, 751, 738, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  30. L.J. Griffiths and C.W. Jim, “An alternative approach to linearly constrained adaptive beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation, vol. 30, pp. 27–34, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M.W. Hoffman, T.D. Trine, K.M. Buckley, and D.J. Van Tasell, “Robust adaptive microphone array processing for hearing aids: Realistic speech enhancement,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 96, pp. 759–770, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J.E. Greenberg and P.M. Zurek, “Preventing reverberation-induced target cancellation in adaptive-array hearing aids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,vol. 95, pp. 29902991, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J.E. Greenberg, “Modified LMS algorithms for speech processing with an adaptive noise canceller,” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Proc., vol. 6, pp. 338–351, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J.E. Greenberg and P.M. Zurek, “Evaluation of an adaptive-beamforming method for hearing aids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 91, pp. 1662–1676, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. J.E. Greenberg, Improved design of microphone-array hearing aids, PhD Thesis, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge MA, USA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  36. P.M. Peterson, “Simulation of the impulse response between a single source and multiple, closely-spaced receivers in a reverberant room,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 80, pp. 1527–1529, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. M. Kompis and N. Dillier, “Noise reduction for hearing aids: Combining directional microphones with an adaptive beamformer,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 96, pp. 1910–1913, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Kompis, P. Feuz, G. Valentini, and M. Pelizzone, “A combined fixed/adaptive beamforming noise-reduction system for hearing aids,” in Proc. 20th Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., pp. 3136–3139, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  39. N. Dillier, T. Frölich, M. Kompis, H. Bögli, and W.K. Lai, “Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants,” J. Rehabil. Res. Bev., vol. 30, pp. 95–109, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. Kompis, N. Diller, J. Francois, J. Tinembart, and R. Häusler, “New targetsignal-detection schemes for multi-microphone noise-reduction systems for hearing aids,” in Proc. 19th Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., pp. 1990–1993, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. Vanden Berghe and J. Wouters, “An adaptive noise canceller for hearing aids using two nearby microphones,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 103, pp. 3621–3626, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. R.M. vanHoesel and G.M. Clark, “Evaluation of a portable two-microphone adaptive beamforming speech processor with cochlear implant patients,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 97, pp. 2498–2503, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. V. Hamacher, W.H. Döering, G. Mauer, H. Fleischmann, and J. Hennecke, “Evaluation of noise reduction systems for cochlear implant users in different acoustic environments,” Am. J. Otol., vol. 18, pp. S45 - S49, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  44. M.W. Hoffman and K.M. Buckley, “Robust time-domain processing of broadband microphone array data,” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Proc.,vol. 3, pp. 193203, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  45. H. Cox, R.M. Zeskind, and M.M. Owen, “Robust adaptive beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Proc., vol. 35, pp. 1365–1376, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. A. Wang, K. Yao, R.E. Hudson, D. Korompis, F. Lorenzellii, and S. Gao: “Microphone array for hearing aid and speech enhancement applications,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Application Specific Systems, Architectures and Processors, pp. 231–239, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  47. D. Korompis, A. Wang, and K. Yao, “Comparison of microphone array designs for hearing aid,” in IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing (ICASSP-95), Detroit MI, USA, pp. 2739–2742, May 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  48. J.G. Desloge, The location-estimating null-steering (LENS) algorithm for adaptive microphone-array processing, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA, USA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  49. P.W. Shields and D.R. Campbell, “Multi-microphone sub-band adaptive signal processing for improvement of hearing aid performance: preliminary results using normal hearing volunteers,” in IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing (ICASSP-97), Munich, Germany, pp. 415–418, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  50. P.W. Shields and D.R. Campbell, “Multi-microphone noise cancellation for improvement of hearing aid performance,” in IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing (ICASSP-98), Seattle WA, USA, pp. 3633–3636, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  51. E.D. McKinney and V.E. DeBrunner, “A two-microphone adaptive broadband array for hearing aids,” in IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing (ICASSP-96), Atlanta GA, USA, pp. 933–936, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  52. V.E. DeBrunner, E.D. McKinney, “A directional adaptive least-mean-square acoustic array for hearing aid enhancement,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 98, pp. 437–444, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. G.L. Gibian, W. Koroljow, A. LaRow, S. Shaw, P. Nelson, and L. Sherlock, “Clinical trials of a hybrid adaptive beamformer (HAB) for improved speech understanding in noise,” in Collected Papers, 137th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the 2nd Convention of the European Acoustics Association, Forum Acusticum, integrating the 25th German Acoustics DAGA Conference, Berlin, Germany, Mar. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  54. P.M. Zurek, “Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility,” in Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, (G.A. Studebaker and I. Hochberg, eds.), Allyn and Bacon, pp. 255–275, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  55. T. Wittkop, S. Albani, V. Hohmann, J. Peissig, W.S. Woods, and B. Kollmeier, “Speech processing for hearing aids: Noise reduction motivated by models of binaural interaction,” Acustica, vol. 83, pp. 684–699, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  56. B. Kollmeier and R. Koch, “Speech enhancement based on physiological and psychoacoustical models of modulation perception and binaural interaction,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 95, pp. 1593–1602, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. H. Schweitzer, A.M. Terry, and M.A. Grim, “Three experimental measures of a digital beamforming signal processing algorithm,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., vol. 7, pp. 230–239, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  58. E. Lindemann and J.L. Melanson, “Noise reduction system for binaural hearing aid,” U.S. Patent no. 5, 651, 071, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  59. B. Kollmeier, J. Pessig, and V. Hohmann, “Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., vol. 30, pp. 82–94, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  60. V. Margo, C. Schweitzer, and G. Feinman, “Comparisons of Spectra 22 performance in noise with and without an additional noise reduction preprocessor,” Seminars in Hearing, vol. 18, pp. 405–415, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. V. Hamacher, H. Fleischmann, G. Mauer, and W.H. Döring, “Evaluation of noise reduction systems for cochlear implant users in different acoustic environment,” presented at Third European Symposium on Paediatric Cochlear Implantation, Hannover, Germany, June 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  62. D. Byrne and W. Noble, “Optimizing sound localization with hearing aids,” Trends in Amplification, vol. 3, pp. 51–73, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. I.L.D.M. Merks, M.M. Boone, and A.J. Berkhout, “Design of a broadside array for a binaural hearing aid,” in Proc. IEEE ASSP Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, Mohonk NY, USA, Oct., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  64. J.G. Desloge, W.M. Rabinowitz, and P.M. Zurek, “Microphone-array hearing aids with binaural output. I. Fixed-processing systems,” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Proc., vol. 5, pp. 529–542, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. F.L. Wightman and D.J. Kistler, “The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 91, pp. 1648–1661, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. D.P. Welker, J.E. Greenberg, J.G. Desloge, and P.M. Zurek, `Microphone-array hearing aids with binaural output. II. A two-microphone adaptive system,” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Proc., vol. 5, pp. 543–551, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. P.M. Zurek and J.E. Greenberg, “Two-microphone adaptive array hearing aids with monaural and binaural outputs,” in Proc. Ninth IEEE DSP Workshop, Hunt TX, USA, Oct. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  68. T.Y.C. Ching, H. Dillon, and D. Byrne, “Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 103, pp. 1128–1140, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. C.A. Hogan and C.W. Turner, “High-frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 104, pp. 432–441, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Julie E. Greenberg

  2. Sensimetrics Corporation, Somerville, MA, USA

    Patrick M. Zurek

Authors
  1. Julie E. Greenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrick M. Zurek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Div. of Eng. and Applied Scciences, Harvard University, 33 Oxford Street, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Michael Brandstein

  2. Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Imperial College, Exhibition Road, SW7 2AZ, London, GB

    Darren Ward

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greenberg, J.E., Zurek, P.M. (2001). Microphone-Array Hearing Aids. In: Brandstein, M., Ward, D. (eds) Microphone Arrays. Digital Signal Processing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04619-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04619-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07547-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04619-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation